Abstract
We used variation partitioning to evaluate significance of local environment, spatial structure and hydrological connectivity in the diatom community variation in phytoplankton and superficial sediments of six reservoirs of southeast Brazil. Common and rare diatom species were represented by different data sets, according to the species relative abundance and frequency of occurrence. To clarify the connectivity effect on the metacommunity organization, analyses were performed with and without a hydrological connectivity matrix as predictor. Results for rare and common species were similar, but explanation power depended on the habitat and the climatic season. The hydrological connectivity predictor proved to play an important role toward explaining the diatom metacommunity dynamics. Consequently, this landscape feature should not be neglected in ecological models of managed rivers.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alahuhta J, Johnson LB, Olker J, Heino J (2014) Species sorting determines variation in the community composition of common and rare macrophytes at various spatial extents. Ecol Complex 20:61–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecocom.2014.08.003
APHA—American Public Health Association (2005) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. American Public Health Association, Washington, DC
Arnan X, Cerdá X, Retana J (2015) Partitioning the impact of environment and spatial structure on alpha and beta components of taxonomic, functional, and phylogenetic diversity in European ants. Peer J 3:e1241. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1241
Arscott DB, Tockner K, Ward JV (2003) Spatio-temporal patterns of benthic invertebrates along the continuum of a braided Alpine river. Arch Hydrobiol 158(4):431–460
Arthington AH, Balcombe SR, Wilson GA, Thoms MC, Marshall J (2005) Spatial and temporal variation in fish-assemblage structure in isolated waterholes during the 2001 dry season of an arid-zone floodplain river, Cooper Creek, Australia. Mar Freshw Res 56(1):25–35. https://doi.org/10.1071/MF04111
Battarbee RW (1986) Diatom analysis. In: Berglund BE (ed) Handbook of holocene paleoecology and paleohydrology. Wiley, London, pp 527–570
Besemer K, Singer G, Quince C, Bertuzzo E, Sloan W, Battin TJ (2013) Headwaters are critical reservoirs of microbial diversity for fluvial networks. Proc R Soc B 280(1771):20131760. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2013.1760
Bicudo DC (1990) Considerações sobre metodologias de contagem de algas do perifíton. Acta Limnol Bras 3:459–475
Blanchet FG, Legendre P, Borcard D (2008a) Modelling directional spatial processes in ecological data. Ecol Modell 215(4):325–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2008.04.001
Blanchet FG, Legendre P, Bocard D (2008b) Forward selection of explanatory variables. Ecology 89(9):2623–2632. https://doi.org/10.1890/07-0986.1
Borcard D, Legendre P (2002) All-scale spatial analysis of ecological data by means of principal coordinates of neighbour matrices. Ecol Modell 153(1–2):51–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3800(01)00501-4
Borcard D, Legendre P, Drapeau P (1992) Partialling out the spatial component of ecological variation. Ecology 73(3):1045–1055
Bozelli RL, Thomaz SM, Padial AA, Lopes PM, Bini LM (2015) Floods decrease zooplankton beta diversity and environmental heterogeneity in an Amazonian floodplain system. Hydrobiologia 753(1):233–241
Cao Y, Larsen DP (2001) Rare species in multivariate analysis for bioassessment: some considerations. J N Am Benthol Soc 20:144–153
Capers RS, Selsky R, Bugbee GJ (2010) The relative importance of local conditions and regional processes in structuring aquatic plant communities. Freshw Biol 55(5):952–966. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02328.x
Chave J, Leigh EG (2002) A spatially explicit neutral model of beta-diversity in tropical forests. Theor Popul Biol 62:153–168. https://doi.org/10.1006/tpbi.2002.1597
Checon HH, Amaral ACZ (2016) Taxonomic sufficiency and the influence of rare species on variation partitioning analysis of a polychaete community. Mar Ecol 38(1):e12384. https://doi.org/10.1111/maec.12384
Cottenie K (2005) Integrating environmental and spatial processes in ecological community dynamics. Ecol Lett 8:1175–1182. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00820.x
Dray S (2007) Pack for: forward selection with permutation. R package version 0.99.467. http://pbil.univ-lyon1.fr/members/dray/software.php. Accessed 18 Apr 2017
Freimann R, Bürgmann H, Findlay SEG, Robinson CT (2015) Hydrologic linkages drive spatial structuring of bacterial assemblages and functioning in alpine floodplains. Front Microbiol 1221(6):1–15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.01221
Gandon S, Michalakis Y (2001) Multiple causes of the evolution of dispersal. Dispersal. Oxford University Press, New York
Gaston KJ (1994) Rarity. Chapman and Hall, London
Gilbert B, Lechowicz MJ (2004) Neutrality, niches, and dispersal in a temperate forest understory. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101(20):7651–7656. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0400814101
Gillet ND, Pan Y, Manoylov KM, Stancheva R, Weilhoefer CL (2011) The potential indicator value of rare taxa richness in diatom-based stream bioassessment. J Phycol 47(3):471–482. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-8817.2011.00993.x
Grime JP (2001) Plant strategies, vegetation processes, and ecosystem properties. Wiley, Chichester
Grinnell J (1917) The niche-relationships of the California Thrasher. Auk 34:427–433
Grönroos M, Heino J, Siqueira T, Landeiro VL, Kotanen J, Bini LM (2013) Metacommunity structuring in stream networks: roles of dispersal mode, distance type, and regional environmental context. Ecol Evol 3(13):4473–4487
Hassan GS, Espinosa MA, Isla FI (2008) Fidelity of dead diatom assemblages in estuarine sediments: how much environmental information is preserved? Palaios 23:112–120. https://doi.org/10.2110/palo.2006.p06-122r
Heino J, Melo AS, Siqueira T, Soininen J, Valanko S, Bini LM (2015) Metacommunity organisation, spatial extent and dispersal in aquatic systems: patterns, processes and prospects. Freshw Biol 60(5):845–869. https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.12533
Hubbell SP (2001) The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography. Princeton monographs in population biology. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
James FC, Johnston RF, Warner NO, Niemi G, Boecklen W (1984) The Grinnellian niche of the wood thrush. Am Nat 124:17–47
Jetz W, Rahbek C (2002) Geographic range size and determinants of Avian species richness. Science 297(5586):1548–1551. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1072779
Jocque M, Field R, Brendonck L, Meester L (2010) Climatic control of dispersal–ecological specialization trade-offs: a metacommunity process at the heart of the latitudinal diversity gradient? Global Ecol Biogeogr 19(2):244–252. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2009.00510.x
Kassen R (2002) The experimental evolution of specialists, generalists, and the maintenance of diversity. J Evol Biol 15(2):173–190. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1420-9101.2002.00377.x
Lamparelli MC (2004) Graus de trofia em corpos d’água do Estado de São Paulo: Avaliação dos métodos de monitoramento. Dissertation, Universidade de São Paulo
Lavoie I, Dillon PJ, Campeau S (2009) The effect of excluding diatom taxa and reducing taxonomic resolution on multivariate analyses and stream bioassessment. Ecol Indic 9(2):213–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2008.04.003
Leibold MA (1995) The Niche concept revisited: mechanistic models and community context. Ecology 76(5):1371–1382. https://doi.org/10.2307/1938141
Liu J, Soininen J, Han B, Declerck SAJ (2013) Effects of connectivity, dispersal directionality and functional traits on the metacommunity structure of river benthic diatoms. J Biogeogr 40(12):2238–2248
Mann DG, Vanormelingen P (2013) An Inordinate Fondness? The Number, Distributions, and Origins of Diatom Species. J Eukaryot Microbiol 60(4):414–420. https://doi.org/10.1111/jeu.12047
Marquardt GM, Bicudo CEM, Ludwig TAV, Ector L, Wetzel CE (in press) Diatom assemblages (Bacillariophyta) in six tropical reservoirs from southeast Brazil: species composition and spatial and temporal variation patterns
Marvier M, Kareiva P, Neubert MG (2004) Habitat destruction, fragmentation, and disturbance promote invasion by habitat generalists in a multispecies metapopulation. Risk Anal 24(4):869–878. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00485.x
Moritz C, Meynard CN, Devictor V, Guizien K, Labrune C, Guarini JM, Mouquet N (2013) Disentangling the role of connectivity, environmental filtering, and spatial structure on metacommunity dynamics. Oikos 122(10):1401–1410. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2013.00377.x
Mouquet N, Loreau M (2003) Community patterns in source-sink metacommunities. Am Nat 162(5):544–557
Nijboer RC, Schmidt-Kloiber A (2004) The effect of excluding taxa with low abundances or taxa with small distribution ranges on ecological assessment. Hydrobiologia 516(1–3):347–363
O’Hare MT, Gunn IDM, Chapman DS, Dudley BJ, Purse BV (2012) Impacts of space, local environment and habitat connectivity on macrophyte communities in conservation lakes. Divers Distrib 18(6):603–614. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2011.00860.x
Oksanen J, Blanchet GF, Kindt R, Legendre P, O’Hara RB, Gavin L, Simpson PS, Henry M, Stevens H, Wagner H (2016) Peter R. vegan: community ecology package. R package version 2.3-5. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan. Accessed 15 Aug 2016
Östergård H, Ehrlén J (2005) Among population variation in specialist and generalist seed predation—the importance of host plant distribution, alternative hosts and environmental variation. Oikos 111(1):39–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0030-1299.2005.13902.x
Padial AA, Ceschin F, Declerck SAJ, Meester L, Bonecker CC, Lansac-Tôha FA, Rodrigues L, Rodrigues LC, Train S, Velho LFM, Bini LM (2014) Dispersal ability determines the role of environmental, spatial and temporal drivers of metacommunity structure. PLoS One 9(10):e111227. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111227
Pappas JL, Stoermer EF (1996) Quantitative method for determining a representative algal sample count. J Phycol 32(4):693–696. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-3646.1996.00693.x
Penha J, Landeiro VL, Ortega JCG, Mateus L (2017) Interchange between flooding and drying, and spatial connectivity control the fish metacommunity structure in lakes of the Pantanal wetland. Hydrobiologia 797(1):115–126
Potapova MG, Charles DF (2002) Benthic diatoms in USA rivers: distributions along spatial and environmental gradients. J Biogeogr 29(2):167–187. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2699.2002.00668.x
Potapova M, Charles DF (2004) Potential use of rare diatoms as environmental indicators in USA rivers. Proceedings of the 17th international diatom symposium. Biopress Ltd., Bristol
R Core Team (2014) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R foundation for statistical computing, Vienna. http://www.R-project.org/
Rabinowitz D (1981) Seven forms of rarity. The biological aspects of rare plant conservation. Wiley, Chichester
Reche I, Pulido-Villena E, Morales-Baquesro R, Csamayor EO (2005) Does ecosystem size determine aquatic bacterial richness? Ecology 86(7):1715–1722. https://doi.org/10.1890/04-1587
Reynolds CS (1980) Phytoplankton assemblages and their periodicity in stratifying lake systems. Holarct Ecol 3:141–159
Reynolds CS (1998) What factors influence the species composition of phytoplankton in lakes of different trophic status? Hydrobiologia 369:11–26
Rodil IF, Lucena-Moya P, Jokinen H, Ollus V, Wennhage H, Villnäs A, Norkko A (2017) The role of dispersal mode and habitat specialization for metacommunity structure of shallow beach invertebrates. PLoS One 12(2):e0172160. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172160Root1988
Root T (1988) Energy constraints on avian distributions and abundances. Ecology 69:330–339
Royo AA, Ristau TE (2012) Stochastic and deterministic processes regulate spatio-temporal variation in seed bank diversity. J Veg Sci 24(4):724–734. https://doi.org/10.1111/jvs.12011
Sartory DP, Grobbelaar JU (1984) Extraction of chlorophyll a from freshwater phytoplankton for spectrophotometric analysis. Hydrobiologia 114(3):177–187. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00031869
Siqueira T, Bini LM, Roque FB, Couceiro SRM, Trivinho-Strixino S, Cottenie K (2012) Common and rare species respond to similar niche processes in macroinvertebrate metacommunities. Ecography 35(2):183–192
Soberón J (2007) Grinnellian and Eltonian niches and geographic distributions of species. Ecol Lett 10:1115–1123. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01107.x
Soininen J (2007) Environmental and spatial control of freshwater diatoms—a review. Diatom Res 22(2):473–490
Soininen J, McDonald R, Hillebrand H (2007) The distance decay of similarity in ecological communities. Ecography 30(1):3–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0906-7590.2007.04817.x
Spitale D (2012) A comparative study of common and rare species in spring habitats. Ecoscience 19(1):80–88. https://doi.org/10.2980/19-1-3435
Székely AJ, Langenheder S (2014) The importance of species sorting differs between habitat generalists and specialists in bacterial communities. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 87(1):102–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/1574-6941.12195
Tilman D (2004) Niche tradeoffs, neutrality, and community structure: a stochastic theory of resource competition, invasion, and community assembly. PNAS 101(30):10854–10861. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0403458101
van der Gucht K, Cottenie K, Muylaert K, Vloemans N, Cousin S, Declerck S, Jeppesen E, Conde-Porcuna JM, Schwenk K, Zwart G, Degans H, Vyverman W, Meester L (2007) The power of species sorting: Local factors drive bacterial community composition over a wide range of spatial scales. PNAS 104(51):20404–20409. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0707200104
Vanormelingen P, Verleyen E, Vyverman W (2008) The diversity and distribution of diatoms: from cosmopolitanism to narrow endemism. Biodivers Conserv 17:393–405. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10531-007-9257-4
Vilmi A, Karjalainen SM, Hellsten S, Heino J (2016) Bioassessment in a metacommunity context: are diatom communities structured solely by species sorting? Ecol Indic 62:86–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.11.043
Vyverman W, Verleyen E, Wilmotte A, Hodgson DA, Willems A, Peeters K, Van de Vijver B, De Wever A, Leliaert F, Sabbe K (2010) Evidence for widespread endemism among Antarctic micro-organisms. Polar Sci 4(2):103–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polar.2010.03.006
Wetzel CE, Bicudo DC, Ector L, Lobo EA, Soininen J, Landeiro VL, Bini LM (2012) Distance decay of similarity in neotropical diatom communities. PLoS One 7(9):e45071. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0045071
Winegardner AK, Beisner E, Legendre P, Gregory-Eaves I (2015) Are the landscape-level drivers of water column and surface sediment diatoms different? Freshw Biol 60(2):267–281. https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.12478
Wojciechowski J, Heino J, Bini LM, Padial AA (2017) Temporal variation in phytoplankton beta diversity patterns and metacommunity structures across subtropical reservoirs. Freshw Biol 62(4):751–766. https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.12899
Zorzal-Almeida S, Bini LM, Bicudo DB (2017) Beta diversity of diatoms is driven by environmental heterogeneity, spatial extent and productivity. Hydrobiologia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-017-3117-3
Acknowledgements
This study was carried out within the framework of the AcquaSed Project supported by funds from FAPESP (Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo, Grant No. 2009/53898-9), and was undertaken as part of GCM thesis at the Instituto de Botânica, São Paulo, Brazil (FAPESP Fellowship No. 2013/10314-2). CEMB thanks CNPq (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico) for Research Fellowship (No. 305031/2016-3). We deeply appreciate the valuable assistance of the personnel from Votorantim Energia for their logistical support during the fieldwork. We are also grateful to Prof. William de Queiróz (Universidade de Guarulhos, Geoprocessing Laboratory) for the study area illustration.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Marquardt, G.C., Padial, A.A. & Bicudo, C.E.M. Variance partitioning of deconstructed tropical diatom communities in reservoirs cascade. Aquat Sci 80, 17 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-018-0571-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-018-0571-6