Skip to main content
Log in

Forecasting Methodology Based on Alternative Presentation of the Gutenberg–Richter Relation

  • Published:
Pure and Applied Geophysics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The main purpose of this study is to propose an innovative methodology to forecast the cumulative probability of future larger earthquakes for any given magnitude. It is based on applying an innovative approach to explicitly incorporate the logarithmic mean annual seismicity rate and its standard deviation, replacing the conventional Gutenberg–Richter (G–R) relation, which is only expressed by the arithmetic mean. The new representation of the G–R relation can provide the median annual seismicity rate and upper and lower bounds of recurrence time period for future larger earthquakes in different regions of Taiwan. Subsequently, the logarithmic mean is found to have a more well-behaved lognormal distribution. The selected crustal earthquake data for 3.0 ≤ Mw ≤ 5.0 are used to obtain alternative Gutenberg–Richter relations for different regions. The results are as follows: \(\log_{10} N = 5.74 - 1.07M_{\text{w}} \pm ( - 0.18 + 0.12M_{\text{w}} )\) in and Taiwan; \(\log_{10} N = 5.08 - 1.07M_{\text{w}} \pm (0.23 + 0.05M_{\text{w}} )\) for northeastern Taiwan offshore; \(\log_{10} N = 5.48 - 0.95M_{\text{w}} \pm ( - 0.32 + 0.14M{}_{\text{w}})\) for eastern Taiwan offshore; \(\log_{10} N = 4.57 - 0.84M_{\text{w}} \pm (0.07 + 0.07M_{\text{w}} )\) for southeastern Taiwan offshore. These results can be used for preventing and mitigating seismic hazards.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aki, K. (1965). Maximum likelihood estimate of b in the formula log N = a − bM and its confidence limits. Bulletin of Earthquake Research Institute, University of Tokyo, 43, 237–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayrak, Y., & Bayrak, E. (2012). Regional variations and correlations of Gutenberg–Richter parameters and fractal dimension for the different seismogenic zones in Western Anatolia. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 58, 98–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, W. Y., Chen, K. P., & Tsai, Y. B. (2016). An updated and refined catalog of earthquakes in Taiwan (1900–2014) with homogenized M w magnitudes. Earth, Planets and Space, 68(45), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-016-0414-4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, K. P., & Tsai, Y. B. (2008). A catalog of Taiwan earthquakes (1900–2006) with homogenized M w magnitudes. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 98, 483–489. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120070136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, S. N. & Yeh, Y. T. (1999) Photo Album of ten disastrous earthquakes in Taiwan. Report Central Weather Bureau and Inst. Earth Sci., Acad. Sin., ROC, 255 pp (in Chinese).

  • Gutenberg, B., & Richter, C. F. (1941). Seismicity of the earth. Geological Society of America, Special Papers, 34, 1–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutenberg, B., & Richter, C. F. (1944). Frequency of earthquakes in California. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 34, 185–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, M. T. (1971). Seismicity of Taiwan and some related problem. Bulletin of the International Institute of Seismology and Earthquake Engineering, 8, 41–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kijko, A. (1985). A modified form of the Gutenberg–Richter magnitude-frequency relation: Maximum likelihood estimation of its parameters. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 75, 319–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma, K. F., Lee, C. T., Tsai, Y. B., Shin, T. C., & Mori, J. (1999). The Chi-Chi, Taiwan earthquake: Large sueface displacements on an inland thrust fault. Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union, 80, 605–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogata, Y., & Zhuang, J. (2006). Space-time ETAS models and an improved extension. Tectonophysics, 413, 13–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shin, T. C., & Teng, T. L. (2001). An overview of the Chi–Chi, Taiwan earthquake. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 91, 895–913.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, Y. B. (1985). A study of disastrous earthquakes in Taiwan, 1683–1985. Bulletin of Institution of the Earth Science, 5, 1–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J. H., & Kuo, H. C. (1995). A catalogue of Ms > 7 Taiwan earthquakes (1900–1994). Journal of the Geological Society of China, 38, 95–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wessel, P., & Smith, W. H. F. (1998). New improved version of generic mapping tools released. Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union, 79, 579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wyss, M. (1973). Towards a physical understanding of the earthquake frequency distribution. Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society, 31, 341–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The paper is dedicated to my respected advisor Professor Yi-Ben Tsai. This study is supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST). We would like to thank Anthony Abram (http://www.uni-edit.net) for editing and proofreading this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kuei-Pao Chen.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, KP., Chang, WY. & Yen, HY. Forecasting Methodology Based on Alternative Presentation of the Gutenberg–Richter Relation. Pure Appl. Geophys. 176, 3411–3423 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-019-02146-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-019-02146-y

Navigation