Advertisement

Mediterranean Journal of Mathematics

, Volume 13, Issue 6, pp 4019–4037 | Cite as

Determination of the Correct Range of Physical Parameters in the Approximate Analytical Solutions of Nonlinear Equations Using the Adomian Decomposition Method

  • Mustafa Turkyilmazoglu
Article

Abstract

Physical parameters in dimensionless form in the governing equations of real-life phenomena naturally occur. How to control them by determining their range of validity is in general a big issue. In this paper, a mathematical approach is presented to identify the correct range of physical parameters adopting the recently popular analytic approximate Adomian decomposition method (ADM). Having found the approximate analytical Adomian series solution up to a specified truncation order, the squared residual error formula is employed to work out the threshold and the existence domain of certain physical parameters satisfying a preassigned tolerance. If the current procedure is not closely pursued, the presented results with the ADM may not be up to the desired level of accuracy (the worst is the divergent physically meaningless solutions), or much more ADM series terms need to be computed to satisfy certain accuracy. Examples reveal the necessity of the present approach to make sure that the results embark the correct range of physical parameters in the study of a physical problem containing several dominating parameters.

Keywords

Governing equation physical parameters Adomian decomposition method squared residual error 

Mathematics Subject Classification

34A45 41A35 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Adomian G., Rach R.: On the solution of algebraic equations by the decomposition method. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 105, 141–166 (1985)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Adomian G.: A review of the decomposition method in applied mathematics. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 135, 501–544 (1988)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sajid M., Awais M., Nadeem S., Hayat T.: The influence of slip condition on thin film flow of a fourth grade fluid by the homotopy analysis method. Comput. Math. Appl. 56, 2019–2026 (2008)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Duan J.S., Rach R.: A new modification of the Adomian decomposition method for solving boundary value problems for higher order nonlinear differential equations. Appl. Math. Comput. 218, 4090–4118 (2011)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Alam M.K., Rahim M.T., Haroon T., Islam S., Siddiqui A.M.: Solution of steady thin film flow of Johnson–Segalman fluid on a vertical moving belt for lifting and drainage problems using Adomian Decomposition Method. Appl. Math. Comput. 218, 10413–10428 (2012)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bhanja D., Kundu B., Mandal P.K.: Thermal analysis of porous pin fin used for electronic cooling. Procedia Eng. 64, 956–965 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dib A., Haiahem A., Said B.B.: An analytical solution of the MHD Jeffery–Hamel flow by the modified Adomian decomposition method. Comput. Fluids 102, 111–115 (2014)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dib A., Haiahem A., Said B.B.: Approximate analytical solution of squeezing unsteady nanofluid flow. Powder Technol. 269, 193–199 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Liao, S.J.: Advances in the Homotopy Analysis Method. World Scientific, Singapore (2014)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of MathematicsHacettepe UniversityBeytepeTurkey

Personalised recommendations