Skip to main content
Log in

On the Generality of Assuming that a Family of Continuous Functions Separates Points

  • Published:
Mediterranean Journal of Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For an algebra \({\mathcal{A}}\) of complex-valued, continuous functions on a compact Hausdorff space (X, τ), it is standard practice to assume that \({\mathcal{A}}\) separates points in the sense that for each distinct pair \({x, y \in X}\) , there exists an \({f \in \mathcal{A}}\) such that \({f(x) \neq f(y)}\) . If \({\mathcal{A}}\) does not separate points, it is known that there exists an algebra \({\widehat{\mathcal{A}}}\) on a compact Hausdorff space \({(\widehat{X}, \widehat{\tau})}\) that does separate points such that the map \({\mathcal{A} \mapsto \widehat{\mathcal{A}}}\) is a uniform norm isometric algebra isomorphism. So it is, to a degree, without loss of generality that we assume \({\mathcal{A}}\) separates points. The construction of \({{\widehat{\mathcal{A}}}}\) and \({(\widehat{X}, \widehat{\tau})}\) does not require that \({\mathcal{A}}\) has any algebraic structure nor that \({(X, \tau)}\) has any properties, other than being a topological space. In this work we develop a framework for determining the degree to which separation of points may be assumed without loss of generality for any family \({\mathcal{A}}\) of bounded, complex-valued, continuous functions on any topological space \({(X, \tau)}\) . We also demonstrate that further structures may be preserved by the mapping \({\mathcal{A} \mapsto \widehat{\mathcal{A}}}\) , such as boundaries of weak peak points, the Lipschitz constant when the functions are Lipschitz on a compact metric space, and the involutive structure of real function algebras on compact Hausdorff spaces.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. B. Conway, A Course in Functional Analysis, Springer, 2000.

  2. L. Gillman and M. Jerison, Rings of Continuous Functions, Springer-Verlag, 1976.

  3. E. Kaniuth, A Course in Commutative Banach Algebras, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, Springer, 2009.

  4. S. H. Kulkarni and B. V. Limaye, Real Function Algebras, Marcel Dekker, Inc., 1992.

  5. Lambert S., Luttman A.: Generalized strong boundary points and boundaries of families of continuous functions. Mediterr. J. Math. 9, 1–20 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. G. M. Leibowitz, Lectures on Complex Function Algebras, Scott, Foresman and Co., 1970.

  7. J. G. Llanova and J. A. Jaramillo, Homomorphisms between algebras of continuous functions, Canad. J. Math. LXI (1) (1989), 132–162.

  8. C. E. Rickart, General Theory of Banach Algebras, Krieger Pub. Co., 1974.

  9. Stone M.H.: Application of the theory of boolean rings to general topology. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 41, 132–162 (1937)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. E. L. Stout, The Theory of Uniform Algebras, Bogden and Quigley, Inc., 1971.

  11. S. Willard, General Topology, Dover Publications, Inc., 2004.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Scott Lambert.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lambert, S., Lee, K. & Luttman, A. On the Generality of Assuming that a Family of Continuous Functions Separates Points. Mediterr. J. Math. 10, 1917–1935 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00009-013-0323-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00009-013-0323-8

Mathematics Subject Classification (2010)

Keywords

Navigation