Advertisement

Nexus Network Journal

, Volume 19, Issue 1, pp 73–83 | Cite as

Robotic Technologies for Non-Standard Design and Construction in Architecture

Research
  • 405 Downloads

Abstract

In November 2015, the Faculty of Architecture at the University of Porto and the Institute for Systems and Computer Engineering, Technology and Science concluded a 2-year research project on the use of robotic fabrication technologies in architecture and building construction. Funded by the national Foundation of Science and Technology, this was a unique and vibrant experience on a new research field for the two institutions. This paper provides a brief description of the research project and its results.

Keywords

Robotic technology Construction techniques Digital fabrication laboratories 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research project was funded by FEDER funds through the Operational Competitiveness Programme—COMPETE, and by national funds through the FCT—Foundation for the Science and Technology (Ref: PTDC/ATP-AQI/5124/2012), and was supported by industrial companies Amorim Isolamentos, Mota Engil, Valchromat and Cerâmica Vale da Gandara. I thank Profs. Dr. A. Paulo Moreira and Germano Veiga and their team at INESC TEC for their partnership in the research project, with a special emphasis on their leadership in the SPIDERobot work. I would also like to express my gratitude to the researchers Pedro Martins, Pedro Varela, Cristina Gasso-Palop and the rest of the team at DFL/CEAU/FAUP for their invaluable collaboration throughout the different tasks, and to Profs. Dr. Carlos Guimarães and João Pedro Xavier, Dean and Vice-Dean of FAUP, for their support for the emergence of this field of research in the school.

References

  1. Cache, Bernard. 1995. Earth Moves. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  2. Kolarevic, Branko, ed. 2003. Architecture in the Digital Age: Design and Manufacturing. New York: Spon Press.Google Scholar
  3. Kolarevic, Branko and Kevin Klinger, eds. 2008. Manufacturing Material Effects: Rethinking Design and Making in Architecture. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Gramazio, Fabio and Matthias Kohler. 2007. Digital Materiality in Architecture. Baden: Lars Müller.Google Scholar
  5. Migayrou, Frédéric, ed. 2005: Architectures Non-Standard. Paris: Center Georges Pompidou.Google Scholar
  6. Sousa, José Pedro, ed. 2015. Robotic Technologies for Non-Standard Design and Construction in Architecture. Porto: FAUP, University of Porto.Google Scholar
  7. (Sousa et al. 2016a) Sousa, José Pedro, Pedro Martins, Pedro de Azambuja Varela. 2016. The CorkCrete Arch project. In: Living Systems and Micro-Utopias: Towards Continuous Designing, Proceedings of the 21st CAADRIA – Computer Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia Conference, pp. 269-274. University of Melbourne.Google Scholar
  8. (Sousa et al. 2016b) Sousa, José Pedro, Cristina Gasso Polap, Eduardo Moreira, Andry Maykol Pinto, José Lima, Paulo Costa, Pedro Costa, Germano Veiga, A. Paulo Moreira. 2016. The SPIDERobot: A Cable-Robot System for On-Site Construction in Architecture. In: Robotic Fabrication in Architecture, Art and Design 2016, Dagmar Reinhardt, Rob Saunders and Jane Burry, eds., pp.230-239. Springer.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kim Williams Books, Turin 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculdade de Arquitectura da Universidade do PortoPortoPortugal

Personalised recommendations