Nexus Network Journal

, Volume 19, Issue 1, pp 45–72 | Cite as

The Spatial Logic of Mamluk Madrassas: Readings in the Geometric and Genotypical Compositions

Research
  • 170 Downloads

Abstract

This paper looks at the spatial development of Mamluks’ educational buildings (madrassas) throughout the Bahri and Burji periods (1260–1517 A.D.). The lines of inquiry aim at investigating diachronically the degree by which madrassas can demonstrate the idea of a single configurationally dominant genotype. Madrassas are scrutinized according to their geometric and spatial attributes; their spatial structure is described according to their patterns of permeability, and interpreted using geometric-syntactic and statistical analysis. Despite the variability of the madrassas’ footprints, this research highlights the conventions essential in stabilizing the madrassa as a building type and identifies the regional ‘court’ and the local ‘Jerusalem’ genotypes. While the results for the first identify an integrated central zone with segregated outer environments, those of the second identify a centrifugal-extroverted plan that tries to expand its circle of presence, and maximize its opportunities of encounter.

Keywords

Mamluk Madrassa Court genotype Jerusalem genotype Educational building Iwan Madrassas Space syntax 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The author would like to thank Petra University for funding this research. Grant Number: (01/05/2013).

References

  1. Abouseif, Doris. B. 1992. Islamic Architecture in Cairo: An Introduction. Netherlands: Brill.Google Scholar
  2. Al-Harithy, Howayda. 2001. The Concept of Space in Mamluk Architecture. Muqarnas 18: 73–93.Google Scholar
  3. Alsayyad, Naser. 2011. Cairo: Histories of a City. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bafna, Sonit. 2001. Geometrical Institutions of Genotype. Proceedings, 3rd International Space-syntax Symposium in Atlanta, Vol. 1, 20.1–20.15.Google Scholar
  5. Burgoyne, Michael. 1987. Mamluk Jerusalem: An Architectural Study. Northampton: Interlink Publishing.Google Scholar
  6. Eilouti, Buthayna and Amer Al-Jokhadar. 2007. A Generative System for Mamluk Madrasa Form-making. Nexus Network Journal 9 (1): 7–29.Google Scholar
  7. Grabar, Oleg. 1984. Reflections on Mamluk Art. Muqarnas 2: 1–12.Google Scholar
  8. Hillier, Bill and Adrian Leaman. 1974. How is Design Possible? Journal of Architectural Research 3 (1): 4–11.Google Scholar
  9. Hillier, Bill, Julienne Hanson, and Heather Graham. 1987. Ideas Are in Things: An Application of the Space-syntax Method to Discovering House Genotypes. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 14: 363–385.Google Scholar
  10. Mahamid, Hatim. 2011. Curricula and Educational Process in Mamluk Madrasas. Education Research Journal 1 (7): 141–151.Google Scholar
  11. Malhis, Shatha. 2016. Narratives in Mamluk Architecture: Spatial and Perceptual Analyses of the Madrassas and Their Mausoleums. Frontiers of Architectural Research 5 (1): 74–90.Google Scholar
  12. Newhall, Amy. W. 1987. The Patronage of the Mamluk Sultan Qa’it Bay, 872–901/1468–1496, Published Ph.D. thesis. Harvard: Harvard University.Google Scholar
  13. Organization of Islamic Capitals and Cities. 1992. Principles of Architectural Design and Urban Planning During Different Islamic Eras. Cairo: Organization of Islamic Capitals and Cities.Google Scholar
  14. Orhun, Deniz, Bill Hillier, and Julienne Hanson. 1995. Spatial Types in Traditional Turkish Houses. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 22: 475–498.Google Scholar
  15. Ostwald, Michael. J. 2011. A Justified Plan Graph Analysis of the Early Houses (1975–1982) of Glen Murcutt. Nexus Network Journal 13 (3): 737–762.Google Scholar
  16. Parker, Robin. 1985. Islamic Monuments in Cairo. Cairo: The American University in Cairo Press.Google Scholar
  17. Pinelo, Joao and Alasdair Turner. 2010. Depthmap 10 (Computer Program). London: UCL.Google Scholar
  18. Rabbat, Nasser. 2010. Mamluk History Through Architecture: Monuments, Culture and Politics in Medieval Egypt and Syria. London: I.B. Tauris.Google Scholar
  19. Varoudis, Tasos. 2014. Depthmap X (Computer Program). London: UCL.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kim Williams Books, Turin 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Architecture and DesignPetra UniversityAmmanJordan

Personalised recommendations