Advertisement

Nexus Network Journal

, Volume 15, Issue 3, pp 549–564 | Cite as

Mathematics for the Design of Variation: The “Nagashima!” Lamp Prototype

  • Stefano Converso
Research
  • 278 Downloads

Abstract

This paper describes the process for design, development and fabrication of a lamp prototype that worked as an experiment in “digital bridges” between different software, using Mathematica as the main source for design geometry that is passed dynamically to platforms for documentation, lighting analysis and rendering, as well as CNC machining for final fabrication. The process will be used as key for discussing the dynamic relationship between variation, design option and analysis, in relation to the richness of our design culture.

Keywords

interoperability scripting design digital fabrication 

References

  1. Bonwetsch, Tobias, D. Kobel, Fabio Gramazio and Matthias Kohler. 2006. The informed Wall: applying additive digital fabrication techniques on architecture. Pp. 489-495 in Synthetic Landscapes. Proceedings of the 25th Annual Conference of the Association for Computer- Aided Design in Architecture.Google Scholar
  2. Bonwetsch, Tobias, Fabio Gramazio and Matthias Kohler. 2007. Digitally Fabricating Non- Standardised Brick Walls. Pp. 191-196 in ManuBuild. Proceedings of the First International Conference, 25-26 April 2007, Rotterdam. M. Sharp, ed. London: CIRIA.Google Scholar
  3. Cache, B. 2003. Towards a Non-Standard Mode of Production. In Architectures Non Standard, Fréderic Migayrou and Mennan Zeynep, eds. Paris: Editions du Centre Pompidou.Google Scholar
  4. Chaszar, André, ed. 2006. Blurring the lines. Chichester, UK and Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  5. Converso Stefano. (2008) SHoP Works, IT Revolution in Architecture. Edilstampa, RomeGoogle Scholar
  6. Converso, Stefano. 2010. The Form Beyond Software. In Digital Design for Construction. Milan: Maggioli Editore.Google Scholar
  7. Converso, Stefano. 2012. SHoP Works, IT Revolution in Architecture. Rome: Edistampa (Eng. ed. of [Converso 2008]).Google Scholar
  8. Frazer, John. 2006. The generation of virtual prototypes for performance optimization. Pp. 208- 212 in Game Set and Match 2. The Architecture Co-Laboratory, Lukas Feireiss and Kas Oosterhuis, eds. Rotterdam: Episode Publishers.Google Scholar
  9. Kilian, Axel, Helmut Pottmann, Andreas Asperl, Michael Hofer and Daril Bentley, eds. 2008. Architectural Geometry. Bentley Press Institute.Google Scholar
  10. Koyré A. (1957) From Closed World to Infinite Universe (Hideyo Noguchi Lecture). John Hopkins University Press, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  11. Lynn, Greg. 2003. Variations calculées. P. 91 in Architectures Non Standard, Fréderic Migayrou and Mennan Zeynep, eds. Paris: Editions du Centre Pompidou.Google Scholar
  12. Lynn, Greg. 2004. Constellations in practice. PRAXIS 6: 8-17.Google Scholar
  13. Nastasi, John. 2005. Retooling the Architecture Machine. Museum Quarterly Journal, Innovation of Digitally-Driven Architecture. XXIII (3)Google Scholar
  14. Paoletti, Ingrid. 2006. Costruire le forme complesse. Innovazione, industrializzazione e trasferimento per il progetto di architettura (Building Complex Shapes). “Tecnologia e progetto” Series. Milan: Editrice Clup.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kim Williams Books, Turin 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dipartimento di ArchitetturaUniversità degli Studi Roma TreRomeITALY

Personalised recommendations