Nexus Network Journal

, Volume 14, Issue 1, pp 25–34 | Cite as

After the Paradigm of Contemporary Physics in Architecture: Spatial Possibilities and Variations



Architecture in the information age becomes a mixture of spatial and temporal processes that are directly linked to changes in science, technology and culture. In the digital era, when information becomes a matter of philosophy, methods of informational transitions provide multiple possibilities for conceptualizing space, and thus opening new horizons to architecture. This research explores algorithms of analogy between string theory, M-theory and architecture. The mathematical spacetime concepts of movement, dimension and topology in physics are studied as tools for achieving informational transitions in the design elements and their structures. As a result this methodology opens numerous possibilities for interpretation and creation of new design morphologies.


information string theory M-theory spacetime morphologies 


  1. Cage John. (1969) A Year from Monday: New Lectures and Writing. Wesleyan University Press, Middletown, CNGoogle Scholar
  2. Emmer Michele. (2004) From Flatland to Hypersurfaces. Birkhäuser, BaselGoogle Scholar
  3. Greene Brian. (2004) The Fabric of the Cosmos. Alfred A. Knopf, New YorkMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. Leyton Michael. (2006) The Structure of Paintings. Springer-Verlag/Wien, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  5. Novak, Marcos. 1998. Transarchitecture and Hypersurfaces: Operations of Transmodernity. Architectural Design 68, 5–6: 84–93.Google Scholar
  6. Oosterhuis Kas. (2002) Hyperbodies: Towards an E-motive Architecture. Birkhäuser, BaselGoogle Scholar
  7. Oosterhuis Kas. (2002) Architecture Goes Wild. Rotterdam, 010 PublishersGoogle Scholar
  8. Powell, Kenneth. 1993. Unfolding Folding. In: Architectural Design Profile 102: Folding in Architecture. Architectural Design 63, 3–4: 6–7.Google Scholar
  9. Prigogine, Ilya and Isabelle STENGERS. 1984. Order Out of Chaos: Man’s New Dialogue with Nature. Boulder: New Science Library.Google Scholar
  10. Robbin, Tony. 1997. Quasicrystal Architecture: The Space of Experience. Pp. 434–435 in Beyond the Cube. The Architecture of Space Frames and Polyhedra, J. Francois Gabriel, ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  11. Terzidis Kostas. (2003) Expressive Form. A Conceptual Approach to Computational Design. Spon Press, London and New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Young John Wesley. (1930) Projective Geometry. Open Court Pub, ChicagoMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kim Williams Books, Turin 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CincinnatiUSA

Personalised recommendations