Abstract
Recent advances in animal biotechnology have opened up entirely new opportunities to address and make significant advances for mankind’s most pressing needs: sustainable and efficient food supply to feed a growing population; increasing demands for food safety and quality and new technologies to enhance human health. Much of this will need to be delivered via uptake of new biotechnologies such as precision genome engineering: the development of genetically modified (GM) animals. However, the acceptance, regulatory processes and application of GM technology has not kept up to speed with the technological and scientific advancements—from a developer’s perspective it’s like driving with the handbrake on. Much of this stems from sceptical public perceptions and concern and the regulatory policies that are currently in place. Both of these issues need to be addressed by the application of sound scientific research in combination with public education and communication that will allow appropriate risk assessments to be undertaken and provide the general public and policy makers with a high level of information and confidence.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bartsch D (2014) GMO regulatory challenges and science: a European perspective. J Verbrauch Lebensm (this issue). doi:10.1007/s00003-014-0885-9
FDA (2009) Guidance for industry—regulation of genetically engineered animals containing heritable recombinant DNA constructs http://www.fda.gov/downloads/AnimalVeterinary/GuidanceComplianceEnforcement/GuidanceforIndustry/UCM113903.pdf. Accessed 20 March 2014
FDA (2012) AquAdvantage Salmon—draft environmental assessment. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/AnimalVeterinary/DevelopmentApprovalProcess/GeneticEngineering/GeneticallyEngineeredAnimals/UCM333102.pdf. Accessed 20 March 2014
Forsberg CW, Phillips JP, Golovan SP, Fan MZ, Meidinger RG, Ajakaiye A, Hilborn D, Hacker RR (2003) The enviropig physiology, performance, and contribution to nutrient management, advances in a regulated environment: the leading edge of change in the pork industry. J Anim Sci 81(Suppl. 2):68–77
Hammer RE, Pursel VG, Rexroad CE, Wall RJ, Bolt DJ, Ebert KM, Palmiter RD, Brinster RL (1985) Production of transgenic rabbits, sheep, and pigs by microinjection. Nature 315:680–683
Keefer CL, Pommer J, Robl JM (2007) The role of transgenic livestock in the treatment of human disease. Counc Agric Sci Technol Issue Pap 35:1–11
Kues WA, Niemann H (2011) Advances in farm animal transgenesis. Prev Vet Med 102(2):146–156
Reggio BC, Green HL, Sansinena M, Chen LH, Behboodi E, Denniston RS, Echelard Y, Godke RA (2002) Production of cloned transgenic goats as a potential source for human pharmaceuticals. Theriogenol 57:445
Schmidt C (2006) Belated approval of first recombinant protein from animal. Nature Biotechnol 24:877
Smith J, Mitchell H (2014) Challenges researchers need to consider when dealing with regulators. J Verbrauch Lebensm (this issue). doi:10.1007/s00003-014-0895-7
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Conference Proceedings “Science into Policy, improving uptake and adoption of research conference” 11th to 13th November 2013 in Brisbane, Australia, a conference sponsored by the OECD Co-operative Research Programme on Biological Resource Management for Sustainable Agricultural Systems.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lowenthal, J.W. Confidence in genetically modified animal research and regulation. J. Verbr. Lebensm. 9 (Suppl 1), 47–50 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00003-014-0884-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00003-014-0884-x