Advertisement

Survey of dioxins, dioxin-like PCBs and marker PCBs in German feeds of plant origin

  • K.-H. Schwind
  • S. Dänicke
  • W. Jira
LEITTHEMA: KONTAMINANTEN

Abstract

Within a representative survey the levels of dioxins (PCDD/PCDF), dioxin-like PCBs and marker PCBs in 206 German feed samples were analysed in the years 2004/2005. The sampling plan included compound feed (N = 115) and roughage and succulent feed (N = 91) and reflected the representative feeding situation in Germany. The median content of WHO-PCB-TEQ in analysed feed samples was 0.017 ng/kg [88% dry matter (d.m.)] and consequently more than a factor of 10 below the action level of 0.35 ng/kg (88% d.m.). A differentiation between compound feed and roughage and succulent feed showed that compound feed [median 0.007 ng/kg (88% d.m.)] were significantly lower contaminated with dioxin-like PCBs than roughage and succulent feed [median 0.058 ng/kg (88% d.m.)]. The median sum contents of the six marker PCBs were 0.16 μg/kg (88% d.m.) for compound feed and 0.56 μg/kg (88% d.m.) for roughage and succulent feed. The median of the WHO-PCDD/F-TEQ was 0.03 ng/kg (88% d.m.), the maximum level of 0.75 ng/kg (88% d.m.) was not exceeded. The median of the WHO-PCDD/F-PCB-TEQ was 0.05 ng/kg (88% d.m.) and consequently a factor of 25 below the maximum level of 1.25 ng/kg. Additionally the samples of roughage and succulent feed were analysed according to their contents of ash insoluble in HCl, representing a degree of the proportion of earthy components in feed. A slight correlation was found between ash insoluble in HCl and WHO-PCDD/F-TEQ (R 2 = 0.59) whereas no correlation was found between ash insoluble in HCl and WHO-PCB-TEQ (R 2 = 0.06).

Keywords

PCDD/F PCBs Feedingstuff Compound feed Roughage Succulent feed 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Dr. Sabine Kruse (Federal Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Consumer Protection; BMELV) for financial support of this project, the German feed inspection authorities for sampling and Wolfram Meng (Federal Office of Consumer Protection and Food Safety; BVL) for valuable informations concerning the sampling of feedingstuffs.

References

  1. BMU (1993) 2. Bericht der Bund/Länder-Arbeitsgruppe Dioxine, Bundesministerium für Umwelt. Naturschutz und Reaktorsicherheit, BonnGoogle Scholar
  2. Buckley EH (1982) Accumulation of airborne polychlorinated biphenyls in foliage. Science 26:520–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Christen R (1984) Polychlorinated biphenyls: analytic, occurrence in silages and codliver oil. Mitt Gebiete Lebensm Hyg 75:93–100Google Scholar
  4. Costera A, Feidt C, Marchand P, Le Bizec B, Rychen G (2006) PCDD/F and PCB transfer to milk in goats exposed to a long-term intake of contaminated hay. Chemosphere 64:650–657CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. DG SANCO (2008) Working document—Non dioxin like PCBs. http://www.bmu.de/files/pdfs/allgemein/application/pdf/non_dioxin_like_pcbs_081008.pdf
  6. DVT (2003) Deutscher Verband Tiernahrung e.V. (DVT), Mischfutter-Tabellarium 2003Google Scholar
  7. EC (2006) Commission Directive 2006/13/EC of 3 February 2006 amending Annexes I and II to Directive 2002/32/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on undesirable substances in animal feed as regards dioxins and dioxin-like PCBs. Off J Eur Union L32:44–53Google Scholar
  8. Ferrario J, Byrne C, Cleverly DH (2000) 2,3,7,8-Dibenzo-p-dioxins in mined clay products from the US: evidence for possible natural origin. Environ Sci Technol 34:4524–4532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fürst P, Krause GH, Hein T, Delschen T, Wilmers K (1993) PCDDs/PCDFs in cow’s milk in relation to their levels in grass and soil. Chemosphere 27:1349–1357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Grove HH, Schmidt H, Knöppler HO (1990) Polychlorinated-Biphenyls (PCB) in milk—experiences of the veterinary public-health administration. Arch Lebensmittelhyg 41:115–119Google Scholar
  11. Hoogenboom LA, Kan CA, Bovee TF, van der Weg G, Onstenk C, Traag WA (2004) Residues of dioxins and PCBs in fat of growing pigs and broilers fed contaminated feed. Chemosphere 57:35–42CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Iwata Y, Westlake WE, Gunther FA (1973) Varying persistence of polychlorinated biphenyls in six California soils under laboratory conditions. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 9:204–211CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Kamphues J, Schulz AJ (2006) Dioxins: risk management by agriculture and feed industry—options and limits. Dtsch tierärztl Wschr 113:298–303Google Scholar
  14. Lorber M, Winters D, Ferrario J, Byrne C, Greene C (2007) Survey of dioxin-like compounds in dairy feeds in the United States. J Agric Food Chem 55:386–395CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Malisch R (2000a) PCDD/F in kaolinitic clays and its relevance for feedingstuffs, food and cosmetics. Organohal Comp 47:326–329Google Scholar
  16. Malisch R (2000b) Increase of the PCDD/F-contamination of milk and butter in countries of the European Union by use of contaminated citrus pulp. Chemosphere 40:1041–1053CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Malisch R, Fürst P (2000) Background contamination of feedstuff with dioxins. Organohal Comp 47:322–325Google Scholar
  18. McLachlan M, Richter W (1998) Uptake and transfer of PCDD/Fs by cattle fed naturally contaminated feedstuffs and feed contaminated as a result of sewage sludge application. 1. Lactating cows. J Agric Food Chem 46:1166–1172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Moza P, Weisgerber J, Klein W (1976) Fate of 2, 2’-di-chlorobiphenyls-14C in carrots, sugar beets and soil under outdoor conditions. Agric Food Chem 24:881–885CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Neuberger M, Grossgut R, Gyimothy J, Leibetseder J (2000) Dioxin contamination of feed and food. Lancet 355:1883–1883Google Scholar
  21. Rivera J, Llerena JJ, Abad E, Caixach J (2001) A new episode of PCDD/PCDFs feed contamination in Europe: the choline chloride. Organohal Comp 51:283–286Google Scholar
  22. Stephens RD, Petreas MX, Hayward DG (1995) Biotransfer and bioaccumulation of dioxins and furans from soil: chickens as a model for foraging animals. Sci Total Environ 175:253–273CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Suzuki M, Arzawa N, Okano G, Tetsuzo T (1977) Translocation of polychlorobiphenyls in soil into plants: a study by a method of culture of soybean sprouts. Arch Environ Contam 5:343–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Traag WA, Kan CA (2006) Residues of dioxins (PCDD/Fs) and PCBs in eggs, fat and livers of laying hens following consumption of contaminated feed. Chemosphere 65:1518–1525CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Van den Berg M, Birnbaum L, Bosveld ATC, Brunstrom B, Cook P, Feeley M, Giesy JP, Hanberg A, Hasegawa R, Kennedy SW, Kubiak T, Larsen JC, Van Leeuwen FXR, Liem AKD, Nolt C, Peterson RE, Poellinger L, Safe S, Schrenk D, Tillitt D, Tysklind M, Younes M, Warn F, Zacharewski T (1998) Toxic Equivalency Factors (TEFs) for PCBs, PCDDs, PCDFs for Humans and Wildlife. Environ Health Perspect 106:775–792CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Van den Berg M, Birnbaum LS, Denison M, De Vito M, Farland W, Feeley M, Fiedler H, Hakansson H, Hanberg A, Haws L, Rose M, Safe S, Schrenk D, Tohyama C, Tritscher A, Tuomisto J, Tysklind M, Walker N, Peterson RE (2006) The 2005 world health organisation reevaluation of human and mammalian toxic equivalency factors for dioxins and dioxin-like compounds. Toxicol Sci 93:223–241CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Van Larebeke N, Hens L, Schepens P, Covaci A, Baeyens J, Everaert K, Bernheim JL, Vlietinck R, De Poorter G (2001) The Belgian PCB and dioxin incident of January–June 1999: exposure data and potential impact on health. Environ Health Perspect 109:265–273CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Wolff J, Blüthgen A, Brüggemann J, Dänicke S, Hecht H, Jira W, Sender I, Rabe E, Schenkel H, Schwind KH, Ubben EH, Ueberschär KH, Valenta H (2003) Untersuchungen an Nebenprodukten der Müllerei auf unerwünschte Stoffe und deren futtermittelrechtliche Bewertung. Schriftenreihe des Bundesministeriums für Verbraucherschutz, Ernährung und Landwirtschaft 496:1–153Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel/Switzerland 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Analysis Division, Federal Research Institute of Nutrition and FoodMax Rubner-Institut (MRI)KulmbachGermany
  2. 2.Institute of Animal Nutrition, Federal Research Institute for Animal HealthFriedrich-Loeffler-Institut (FLI)BraunschweigGermany

Personalised recommendations