Advertisement

Histochemistry

, Volume 80, Issue 6, pp 519–522 | Cite as

Assessment of resolution by half distance values for tritium and radioiodine in electron microscopic radioautographs using Ilford L4 emulsion developed by “Solution Physical” or D-19b methods

  • B. M. Kopriwa
  • G. M. Levine
  • N. J. Nadler
Article
  • 22 Downloads

Summary

Half distance values for electron microscopic (EM) radioautographs with the isotopes3H and125I were determined using Ilford L4 emulsion processed with either fine grain, solution physical development, or filamentous grain, chemical development with D-19b.3H- and125I-line sources, obtained by cutting perpendicular sections from sections of3H-labeled methacrylate or125I-labeled thyroid glands, were processed for EM radioautography. The distribution of silver grains around a line source was determined by measuring their distance from the source in photographs of EM radioautographs. The number of silver grains per unit distance from the line source was plotted on graphs and half distance values were calculated. With solution physical development, the half distance value was 76 nm for3H and 80 nm for125I; whereas with D-19 b development it was 187 nm for3H and 157 nm for125I. Since solution physical development produced a reduction of about 50% in the half distance values for both isotopes, it is concluded that the production of fine grain by this method provides better resolution for EM radioautography than filamentous grain development with D-19 b.

Keywords

Public Health Electron Microscopic Methacrylate Tritium Thyroid Gland 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Blackett NM, Parry DM (1973) A new method for analysing electron microscope autoradiographs using hypothetical grain distributions. J Cell Biol 57:9–16Google Scholar
  2. Blackett NM, Parry DM (1977) A simplified method of “hypothetical grain” analysis of electron microscope autoradiographs. J Histochem Cytochem 25:206–214Google Scholar
  3. Kopriwa BM (1973) A reliable, standardized method for ultrastructural electron microscopic radioautography. Histochemie 37:1–17Google Scholar
  4. Kopriwa BM (1975) A comparison of various procedures for fine grain development in electron microscopic radioautography. Histochemistry 44:201–224Google Scholar
  5. Levine GM (1977) An assessment of methods used for quantitative electron-microscope radioautography. Master of Science thesis, Department of Anatomy, McGill UniversityGoogle Scholar
  6. Nadler NJ (1971) Interpretation of grain counts in electron microscope radioautography. J Cell Biol 49:877–882Google Scholar
  7. Nadler NJ (1979) Quantitation and resolution in electron microscope radioautography. J Histochem Cytochem 27:1531–1533Google Scholar
  8. Nadler NJ, Chajut NR (1972) Site of binding of iodine by thyroglobulin in rat thyroid follicles using electron microscope radioautography. IV International Congress of Endocrinology, Washington, DC p 59Google Scholar
  9. Salpeter MM, Bachmann L, Salpeter EE (1969) Resolution in electron microscope radioautography. J Cell Biol 41:1–20Google Scholar
  10. Salpeter MM, Fertuck HC, Salpeter EE (1977) Resolution in electron microscope autoradiography. III.125Iodine, the effect of heavy metal staining, and a reassessment of critical parameters. J Cell Biol 72:161–173Google Scholar
  11. Salpeter MM, McHenry FA, Salpeter EE (1978) Resolution in electron microscope autoradiography. IV. Application to analysis of autoradiographs. J Cell Biol 76:127–145Google Scholar
  12. Williams MA (1969) The assessment of electron microscope radioautographs. Adv Opt Electron Microsc 3:219–272Google Scholar
  13. Yang GC, Shea SM (1975) The precise measurements of the thickness of ultrathin sections by a “re-sectioned section” technique. J Microsc 103:385–392Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. M. Kopriwa
    • 1
  • G. M. Levine
    • 1
  • N. J. Nadler
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of AnatomyMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations