Research in Experimental Medicine

, Volume 190, Issue 1, pp 19–23 | Cite as

Comparative neuroprotective effects of pentobarbital, vinpocetine, flunarizine and ifenprodil on ischemic neuronal damage in the gerbil hippocampus

  • T. Araki
  • K. Kogure
  • K. Nishioka


We studied the protective effects of pentobarbital, vinpocetine, flunarizine, and ifenprodil on delayed neuronal death using Mongolian gerbils. The animals were allowed to survive for 7 days after 5 min of cerebral ischemia induced by bilateral occlusion of the common carotid arteries. Hippocampal cell loss was quantified histologically 7 days following ischemia. Intraperitoneal application of pentobarbital (40 mg/kg) 30 min and vinpocetine (50 and 100 mg/kg) 10 min before ischemia significantly reduced neuronal cell loss in the CA1 sector. However, the intraperitoneal administration of flunarizine (10 and 30 mg/kg) and ifenprodil (10 and 30 mg/kg) 15 min before ischemia was not protective. The results suggest that pentobarbital and vinpocetine prevent ischemic neuronal damage, but not flunarizine and ifenprodil. These findings are of interest in relation to the mechanism of delayed neuronal death.

Key words

Cerebral ischemia Delayed neuronal death Therapeutic prevention 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Abe K, Kogure K, Yamamoto H, Imazawa M, Miyamoto K (1987) Mechanism of arachidonic acid liberation during ischemia in gerbil cerebral cortex. J Neurochem 48: 503–509PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alps BJ, Calder C, Hass WK, Wilson AD (1988) Comparative protective effects of nicardipine, flunarizine, lidoflazine and nimodipine against ischaemic injury in the hippocampus of the mongolian gerbil. Br J Pharmacol 93: 877–883PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dragunow M, Faull RLM (1988) Neuroprotective effects of adenosine. Trends Pharmacol Sci 9: 193–194PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gill R, Foster AC, Woodruff GN (1988) MK-801 is neuroprotective in gerbils when administered during the post-ischemic period. Neuroscience 25: 847–855PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Izumiyama K, Kogure K (1988) Prevention of delayed neuronal death in gerbil hippocampus by ion channel blockers. Stroke 19: 1003–1007PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kárpáti E, Szporny L (1976) General and cerebral haemodynamic activity of ethyl apovincaminate. Arzneimittelforschung 26: 1908–1912PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Katsuragi T, Ohba M, Mori R, Kushiku K, Furukawa T (1984) Calcium antagonistic action involved in vasodilation by brovincamine. Gen Pharmacol 15: 43–45PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kirino T (1982) Delayed neuronal death in the gerbil hippocampus following ischemia. Brain Res 239: 57–69PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kirino T, Tamura A, Sano K (1986) A reversible type of neuronal injury following ischemia in the gerbil hippocampus. Stroke 17: 455–459PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    King GA (1987) Protective effects of vinpocetine and structurally related drugs on the lethal consequences of hypoxia in mice. Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther 286: 299–307PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Otomo E, Atarashi J, Araki G, Ito E, Omae T, Kuzuya F, Fukada T, Ebi O (1985) Comparison of vinpocetine with ifenprodil tartrate and dihydroergotoxine mesylate treatment and results of long-term treatment with vinpocetine. Curr Ther Res 37: 811–821Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pulsinelli WA (1985) Selective neuronal vulnerability: Morphological and molecular characteristics. In: Kogure K, Hossman K-A, Siesjö BK, Welsh FA (eds) Progress in brain research, vol 63, Elsevier, New York, pp 29–37Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sasaki T, Nakagomi T, Kirino T, Tamura A, Noguchi M, Saito I, Takakura K (1988) Indomethacin ameliorates ischemic neuronal damage in the gerbil hippocampal CA1 sector. Stroke 19: 1399–1403PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sauer D, Rischke R, Beck T, Toßberg C, Mennel HD, Bielenberg GW, Krieglstein J (1988) Vinpocetine prevents ischemic cell damage in rat hippocampus. Life Sci 43: 1733–1739PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Staessen AJ (1977) Treatment of circulatory disturbances with flunarizine and cinnarizine. A multicentre, double-blind and placebo-controlled evaluation. Vasa 6: 59–71PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sternau LL, Lust WD, Ricci AJ, Ratcheson R (1989) Role for δ-aminobutyric acid in selective vulnerability in gerbils. Stroke 20: 281–287PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Szobor A, Klein M (1976) Ethyl apovincaminate therapy in neurovascular diseases. Arzneimittelforschung 26: 1984–1989PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Westerberg E, Deshpande JK, Wieloch T (1987) Regional differences in arachidonic acid release in rat hippocampus CA1 and CA3 regions during cerebral ischemia. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 7: 189–192PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. Araki
    • 1
  • K. Kogure
    • 1
  • K. Nishioka
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Neurology, Institute of Brain DiseasesTohoku University School of MedicineMiyagiJapan

Personalised recommendations