Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative neuroprotective effects of pentobarbital, vinpocetine, flunarizine and ifenprodil on ischemic neuronal damage in the gerbil hippocampus

  • Published:
Research in Experimental Medicine

Summary

We studied the protective effects of pentobarbital, vinpocetine, flunarizine, and ifenprodil on delayed neuronal death using Mongolian gerbils. The animals were allowed to survive for 7 days after 5 min of cerebral ischemia induced by bilateral occlusion of the common carotid arteries. Hippocampal cell loss was quantified histologically 7 days following ischemia. Intraperitoneal application of pentobarbital (40 mg/kg) 30 min and vinpocetine (50 and 100 mg/kg) 10 min before ischemia significantly reduced neuronal cell loss in the CA1 sector. However, the intraperitoneal administration of flunarizine (10 and 30 mg/kg) and ifenprodil (10 and 30 mg/kg) 15 min before ischemia was not protective. The results suggest that pentobarbital and vinpocetine prevent ischemic neuronal damage, but not flunarizine and ifenprodil. These findings are of interest in relation to the mechanism of delayed neuronal death.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abe K, Kogure K, Yamamoto H, Imazawa M, Miyamoto K (1987) Mechanism of arachidonic acid liberation during ischemia in gerbil cerebral cortex. J Neurochem 48: 503–509

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Alps BJ, Calder C, Hass WK, Wilson AD (1988) Comparative protective effects of nicardipine, flunarizine, lidoflazine and nimodipine against ischaemic injury in the hippocampus of the mongolian gerbil. Br J Pharmacol 93: 877–883

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Dragunow M, Faull RLM (1988) Neuroprotective effects of adenosine. Trends Pharmacol Sci 9: 193–194

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gill R, Foster AC, Woodruff GN (1988) MK-801 is neuroprotective in gerbils when administered during the post-ischemic period. Neuroscience 25: 847–855

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Izumiyama K, Kogure K (1988) Prevention of delayed neuronal death in gerbil hippocampus by ion channel blockers. Stroke 19: 1003–1007

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kárpáti E, Szporny L (1976) General and cerebral haemodynamic activity of ethyl apovincaminate. Arzneimittelforschung 26: 1908–1912

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Katsuragi T, Ohba M, Mori R, Kushiku K, Furukawa T (1984) Calcium antagonistic action involved in vasodilation by brovincamine. Gen Pharmacol 15: 43–45

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kirino T (1982) Delayed neuronal death in the gerbil hippocampus following ischemia. Brain Res 239: 57–69

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kirino T, Tamura A, Sano K (1986) A reversible type of neuronal injury following ischemia in the gerbil hippocampus. Stroke 17: 455–459

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. King GA (1987) Protective effects of vinpocetine and structurally related drugs on the lethal consequences of hypoxia in mice. Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther 286: 299–307

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Otomo E, Atarashi J, Araki G, Ito E, Omae T, Kuzuya F, Fukada T, Ebi O (1985) Comparison of vinpocetine with ifenprodil tartrate and dihydroergotoxine mesylate treatment and results of long-term treatment with vinpocetine. Curr Ther Res 37: 811–821

    Google Scholar 

  12. Pulsinelli WA (1985) Selective neuronal vulnerability: Morphological and molecular characteristics. In: Kogure K, Hossman K-A, Siesjö BK, Welsh FA (eds) Progress in brain research, vol 63, Elsevier, New York, pp 29–37

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sasaki T, Nakagomi T, Kirino T, Tamura A, Noguchi M, Saito I, Takakura K (1988) Indomethacin ameliorates ischemic neuronal damage in the gerbil hippocampal CA1 sector. Stroke 19: 1399–1403

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Sauer D, Rischke R, Beck T, Toßberg C, Mennel HD, Bielenberg GW, Krieglstein J (1988) Vinpocetine prevents ischemic cell damage in rat hippocampus. Life Sci 43: 1733–1739

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Staessen AJ (1977) Treatment of circulatory disturbances with flunarizine and cinnarizine. A multicentre, double-blind and placebo-controlled evaluation. Vasa 6: 59–71

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Sternau LL, Lust WD, Ricci AJ, Ratcheson R (1989) Role for δ-aminobutyric acid in selective vulnerability in gerbils. Stroke 20: 281–287

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Szobor A, Klein M (1976) Ethyl apovincaminate therapy in neurovascular diseases. Arzneimittelforschung 26: 1984–1989

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Westerberg E, Deshpande JK, Wieloch T (1987) Regional differences in arachidonic acid release in rat hippocampus CA1 and CA3 regions during cerebral ischemia. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 7: 189–192

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Araki, T., Kogure, K. & Nishioka, K. Comparative neuroprotective effects of pentobarbital, vinpocetine, flunarizine and ifenprodil on ischemic neuronal damage in the gerbil hippocampus. Res. Exp. Med. 190, 19–23 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00020002

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00020002

Key words

Navigation