Skip to main content
Log in

Evolution of postmating isolation: comparison of three models based on possible genetic mechanisms

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
Population Ecology

Abstract

In this study, we simulated the process of the evolution of postmating isolation using three models in which postmating isolation is caused by (1) genetic divergence through collaborative coevolution, (2) genetic divergence through antagonistic coevolution resulting from sexual conflict, and (3) genetic divergence through combinational incompatibility. The collaborative coevolution model and the combinational incompatibility model showed a similar decreasing pattern of hybrid compatibility over generations depending on population size and mutation rates. The antagonistic coevolution model showed that reproductive isolation can evolve rapidly depending on the intensity of selection. In the combinational incompatibility model, the increasing number of loci that interact and result in incompatibility would have both promoting and inhibiting effects on the formation of hybrid incompatibility in the earlier stage of isolation. Mutation rates for genes causing incompatibility significantly affect the number of generations required for postmating isolation, which indicates that models assuming high mutation rates (e.g., μ = 10−4) might predict much faster evolution for reproductive isolation than those observed in real populations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received: January 29, 2001 / Accepted: July 4, 2001

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hayashi, T., Kawata, M. Evolution of postmating isolation: comparison of three models based on possible genetic mechanisms. Popul Ecol 43, 179–188 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00012028

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00012028

Navigation