Skip to main content
Log in

Conformal supergravity in three dimensions: off-shell actions

  • Published:
Journal of High Energy Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Using the off-shell formulation for \( \mathcal{N} \)-extended conformal supergravity in three dimensions that has recently been presented in arXiv:1305.3132, we construct superspace actions for conformal supergravity theories with \( \mathcal{N} \) < 6. For each of the cases considered, we work out the complete component action as well as the gauge transformation laws of the fields belonging to the Weyl supermultiplet. The \( \mathcal{N} \) = 1 and \( \mathcal{N} \) = 2 component actions derived coincide with those proposed by van Nieuwenhuizen and Roček in the mid-1980s. The off-shell \( \mathcal{N} \) = 3, \( \mathcal{N} \) = 4 and \( \mathcal{N} \) = 5 supergravity actions are new results. Upon elimination of the auxiliary fields, these actions reduce to those constructed by Lindström and Roček in 1989 (and also by Gates and Nishino in 1993).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. D. Butter, S.M. Kuzenko, J. Novak and G. Tartaglino-Mazzucchelli, Conformal supergravity in three dimensions: New off-shell formulation, JHEP 09 (2013) 072 [arXiv:1305.3132] [INSPIRE].

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. D. Butter, N = 1 Conformal Superspace in Four Dimensions, Annals Phys. 325 (2010) 1026 [arXiv:0906.4399] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. D. Butter, N = 2 Conformal Superspace in Four Dimensions, JHEP 10 (2011) 030 [arXiv:1103.5914] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. P.S. Howe, J. Izquierdo, G. Papadopoulos and P. Townsend, New supergravities with central charges and Killing spinors in (2 + 1)-dimensions, Nucl. Phys. B 467 (1996) 183 [hep-th/9505032] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. S.M. Kuzenko, U. Lindström and G. Tartaglino-Mazzucchelli, Off-shell supergravity-matter couplings in three dimensions, JHEP 03 (2011) 120 [arXiv:1101.4013] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. S.M. Kuzenko and G. Tartaglino-Mazzucchelli, Three-dimensional N = 2 (AdS) supergravity and associated supercurrents, JHEP 12 (2011) 052 [arXiv:1109.0496] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. P. van Nieuwenhuizen, D = 3 Conformal Supergravity and Chern-Simons Terms, Phys. Rev. D 32 (1985) 872 [INSPIRE].

    MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. M. Roček and P. van Nieuwenhuizen, N ≥ 2 supersymmetric Chern-Simons terms as d = 3 extended conformal supergravity, Class. Quant. Grav. 3 (1986) 43 [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. U. Lindström and M. Roček, Superconformal Gravity in Three-dimensions as a Gauge Theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62 (1989) 2905 [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. H. Nishino and S.J. Gates Jr., Chern-Simons theories with supersymmetries in three-dimensions, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 8 (1993) 3371 [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. S.M. Kuzenko and G. Tartaglino-Mazzucchelli, Conformal supergravities as Chern-Simons theories revisited, JHEP 03 (2013) 113 [arXiv:1212.6852] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. M.F. Hasler, The Three form multiplet in N = 2 superspace, Eur. Phys. J. C 1 (1998) 729 [hep-th/9606076] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. S.J. Gates Jr., Ectoplasm has no topology: The Prelude, hep-th/9709104 [INSPIRE].

  14. S.J. Gates Jr., M.T. Grisaru, M.E. Knutt-Wehlau and W. Siegel, Component actions from curved superspace: Normal coordinates and ectoplasm, Phys. Lett. B 421 (1998) 203 [hep-th/9711151] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. L. Castellani, R. D’Auria and P. Fre, Supergravity and superstrings: A Geometric perspective. Vol. 2: Supergravity, World Scientific, Singapore (1991).

  16. D. Butter, S.M. Kuzenko and J. Novak, The linear multiplet and ectoplasm, JHEP 09 (2012) 131 [arXiv:1205.6981] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. D.Z. Freedman and A. Van Proeyen, Supergravity, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge U.K. (2012).

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. P. Van Nieuwenhuizen, Supergravity, Phys. Rept. 68 (1981) 189 [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. E. Fradkin and A.A. Tseytlin, Conformal supergravity, Phys. Rept. 119 (1985) 233 [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. B. Zupnik and D. Pak, Superfield Formulation of the Simplest Three-dimensional Gauge Theories and Conformal Supergravities, Theor. Math. Phys. 77 (1988) 1070 [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. S.M. Kuzenko, Prepotentials for N = 2 conformal supergravity in three dimensions, JHEP 12 (2012) 021 [arXiv:1209.3894] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. G. Bossard, P. Howe, U. Lindström, K. Stelle and L. Wulff, Integral invariants in maximally supersymmetric Yang-Mills theories, JHEP 05 (2011) 021 [arXiv:1012.3142] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. G. Bossard, P. Howe and K. Stelle, Invariants and divergences in half-maximal supergravity theories, arXiv:1304.7753 [INSPIRE].

  24. M. Becker, D. Constantin, S.J. Gates Jr., I. Linch, William Divine, W. Merrell et al., M theory on spin(7) manifolds, fluxes and 3-D, N = 1 supergravity, Nucl. Phys. B 683 (2004) 67 [hep-th/0312040] [INSPIRE].

  25. V. Kac, Lie Superalgebras, Adv. Math. 26 (1977) 8 [INSPIRE].

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. B.S. DeWitt, Supermanifolds, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge U.K. (1992).

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. J. Wess and B. Zumino, The Component Formalism Follows From the Superspace Formulation of Supergravity, Phys. Lett. B 79 (1978) 394 [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. J. Wess and J. Bagger, Supersymmetry and Supergravity, Princeton University Press, Princeton U.K. (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  29. S.J. Gates Jr., M.T. Grisaru, M. Roček and W. Siegel, Superspace Or One Thousand and One Lessons in Supersymmetry, Front. Phys. 58 (1983) 1 [hep-th/0108200] [INSPIRE].

    Google Scholar 

  30. L. Baulieu, M.P. Bellon and R. Grimm, BRS Symmetry of Supergravity in Superspace and Its Projection to Component Formalism, Nucl. Phys. B 294 (1987) 279 [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. P. Binetruy, G. Girardi and R. Grimm, Supergravity couplings: A Geometric formulation, Phys. Rept. 343 (2001) 255 [hep-th/0005225] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. J. Greitz and P. Howe, Maximal supergravity in three dimensions: supergeometry and differential forms, JHEP 07 (2011) 071 [arXiv:1103.2730] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. U. Gran, J. Greitz, P.S. Howe and B.E. Nilsson, Topologically gauged superconformal Chern-Simons matter theories, JHEP 12 (2012) 046 [arXiv:1204.2521] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  34. S. Deser and J. Kay, Topologically massive supergravity, Phys. Lett. B 120 (1983) 97 [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  35. S. Deser, Cosmological topological supergravity, in Quantum Theory Of Gravity, S.M. Christensen (Ed.), Adam Hilger, Bristol (1984).

  36. E.A. Bergshoeff, O. Hohm, J. Rosseel and P.K. Townsend, On Maximal Massive 3D Supergravity, Class. Quant. Grav. 27 (2010) 235012 [arXiv:1007.4075] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  37. S.M. Kuzenko, U. Lindström, M. Roček, I. Sachs and G. Tartaglino-Mazzucchelli, work in progress.

  38. P.S. Howe and M. Leeming, Harmonic superspaces in low dimensions, Class. Quant. Grav. 11 (1994) 2843 [hep-th/9408062] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  39. B. Zupnik, Chern-Simons D = 3, N = 6 superfield theory, Phys. Lett. B 660 (2008) 254 [arXiv:0711.4680] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  40. B. Zupnik, Chern-Simons theory in SO(5)/U(2) harmonic superspace, Theor. Math. Phys. 157 (2008) 1550 [arXiv:0802.0801] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  41. I.A. Bandos, D.P. Sorokin and D. Volkov, On the generalized action principle for superstrings and supermembranes, Phys. Lett. B 352 (1995) 269 [hep-th/9502141] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  42. L. Bonora, P. Pasti and M. Tonin, Chiral Anomalies in Higher Dimensional Supersymmetric Theories, Nucl. Phys. B 286 (1987) 150 [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  43. P.S. Howe, O. Raetzel and E. Sezgin, On brane actions and superembeddings, JHEP 08 (1998) 011 [hep-th/9804051] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  44. S.M. Kuzenko, J.-H. Park, G. Tartaglino-Mazzucchelli and R. Unge, Off-shell superconformal nonlinear σ-models in three dimensions, JHEP 01 (2011) 146 [arXiv:1011.5727] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gabriele Tartaglino-Mazzucchelli.

Additional information

ArXiv ePrint: 1306.1205

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Butter, D., Kuzenko, S.M., Novak, J. et al. Conformal supergravity in three dimensions: off-shell actions. J. High Energ. Phys. 2013, 73 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP10(2013)073

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP10(2013)073

Keywords

Navigation