N = 3 SCFTs in 4 dimensions and non-simply laced groups


In this paper we discuss various N = 3 SCFTs in 4 dimensions and in particular those which can be obtained as a discrete gauging of an N = 4 SYM theories with non- simply laced groups. The main goal of the project was to compute the Coulomb branch superconformal index and moduli space Hilbert series for the N = 3 SCFTs that are obtained from gauging a discrete subgroup of the global symmetry group of N = 4 Super Yang-Mills theory. The discrete subgroup contains elements of both SU(4) R-symmetry group and the S-duality group of N = 4 SYM. This computation was done for the simply laced groups (where the S-duality groups is SL(2, ℤ) and Langlands dual of the algebra \( {}^L\mathfrak{g} \) is simply \( \mathfrak{g} \)) by Bourton et al. [1], and we extended it to the non-simply laced groups. We also considered the orbifolding groups of the Coulomb branch for the cases when Coulomb branch is relatively simple; in particular, we compared them with the results of Argyres et al. [2], who classified all N 3 moduli space orbifold geometries at rank 2 and with the results of Bonetti et al. [3], who listed all possible orbifolding groups for the freely generated Coulomb branches of N 3 SCFTs. Finally, we have considered sporadic complex crystallographic reflection groups with rank greater than 2 and analyzed, which of them can correspond to an N = 3 SCFT with a principal Dirac pairing.

A preprint version of the article is available at ArXiv.


  1. [1]

    T. Bourton, A. Pini and E. Pomoni, 4d N = 3 indices via discrete gauging, JHEP10 (2018) 131 [arXiv:1804.05396] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. [2]

    P.C. Argyres, A. Bourget and M. Martone, Classification of all N 3 moduli space orbifold geometries at rank 2, arXiv:1904.10969 [INSPIRE].

  3. [3]

    F. Bonetti, C. Meneghelli and L. Rastelli, VOAs labelled by complex reflection groups and 4d SCFTs, JHEP05 (2019) 155 [arXiv:1810.03612] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. [4]

    O. Aharony and Y. Tachikawa, S-folds and 4d N = 3 superconformal field theories, JHEP06 (2016) 044 [arXiv:1602.08638] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. [5]

    A.D. Shapere and Y. Tachikawa, Central charges of N = 2 superconformal field theories in four dimensions, JHEP09 (2008) 109 [arXiv:0804.1957] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. [6]

    A. Bourget, A. Pini and D. Rodríguez-Gómez, Gauge theories from principally extended disconnected gauge groups, Nucl. Phys.B 940 (2019) 351 [arXiv:1804.01108] [INSPIRE].

  7. [7]

    G. Arias-Tamargo, A. Bourget, A. Pini and D. Rodríguez-Gómez, Discrete gauge theories of charge conjugation, Nucl. Phys.B 946 (2019) 114721 [arXiv:1903.06662] [INSPIRE].

  8. [8]

    P.C. Argyres and M. Martone, Coulomb branches with complex singularities, JHEP06 (2018) 045 [arXiv:1804.03152] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. [9]

    P.C. Argyres, C. Long and M. Martone, The singularity structure of scale-invariant rank-2 Coulomb branches, JHEP05 (2018) 086 [arXiv:1801.01122] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. [10]

    P.C. Argyres and M. Martone, 4d N = 2 theories with disconnected gauge groups, JHEP03 (2017) 145 [arXiv:1611.08602] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. [11]

    P. Argyres, M. Lotito, Y. Lü and M. Martone, Geometric constraints on the space of N = 2 SCFTs. Part III: enhanced Coulomb branches and central charges, JHEP02 (2018) 003 [arXiv:1609.04404] [INSPIRE].

  12. [12]

    M. Caorsi and S. Cecotti, Geometric classification of 4d N = 2 SCFTs, JHEP07 (2018) 138 [arXiv:1801.04542] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. [13]

    G.C. Shephard and J.A. Todd, Finite unitary reflection groups, Canad. J. Math.6 (1954) 274.

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. [14]

    O. Aharony, N. Seiberg and Y. Tachikawa, Reading between the lines of four-dimensional gauge theories, JHEP08 (2013) 115 [arXiv:1305.0318] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. [15]

    P.C. Argyres, A. Kapustin and N. Seiberg, On S-duality for non-simply-laced gauge groups, JHEP06 (2006) 043 [hep-th/0603048] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. [16]

    A. Kapustin and E. Witten, Electric-magnetic duality and the geometric Langlands program, Commun. Num. Theor. Phys.1 (2007) 1 [hep-th/0604151] [INSPIRE].

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. [17]

    W. Feit, Some integral representations of complex reflection groups, J. Alg.260 (2003) 138.

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mikhail Evtikhiev.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

ArXiv ePrint: 2004.03919

Rights and permissions

This article is published under an open access license. Please check the 'Copyright Information' section for details of this license and what re-use is permitted. If your intended use exceeds what is permitted by the license or if you are unable to locate the licence and re-use information, please contact the Rights and Permissions team.

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Evtikhiev, M. N = 3 SCFTs in 4 dimensions and non-simply laced groups. J. High Energ. Phys. 2020, 125 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP06(2020)125

Download citation


  • Extended Supersymmetry
  • Conformal Field Theory
  • Supersymmetric Gauge
  • Theory