Non-local symmetries for Yang-Mills theories and their massive counterparts in two and three dimensions

  • Abhishek Agarwal
  • Ansar Fayyazuddin


We identify a non-local symmetry for Yang-Mills theories in 1 + 1 and 2 + 1 spacetime dimensions. The symmetry mixes a vector current constructed out of the gauge field with the gauge field itself. We specify the current through a set of defining equations. The explicit solution for the current is obtained in two spacetime dimensions and in the abelian case in three dimensions. The current can be viewed as arising from a non-local, gauge and Lorentz invariant mass term in three dimensions. We also construct a conserved current associated with the symmetry generators and derive some of its properties. In the Abelian case, we compute the symmetry algebra and show that additional symmetry generators have to be included for the algebra to close. The algebra contains an SO(2,1) subalgebra. We comment on the implications of this symmetry for \( \mathcal{N} = 1 \) supersymmetry.


Field Theories in Lower Dimensions Duality in Gauge Field Theories 


  1. [1]
    G. Alexanian and V. Nair, A selfconsistent inclusion of magnetic screening for the quark-gluon plasma, Phys. Lett. B 352 (1995) 435 [hep-ph/9504256] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    V. Nair, Hard thermal loops in a moving plasma and a magnetic mass term, Phys. Lett. B 352 (1995) 117 [hep-th/9406073] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    D. Karabali, C.-j. Kim and V. Nair, Manifest covariance and the Hamiltonian approach to mass gap in (2 + 1)-dimensional Yang-Mills theory, Phys. Rev. D 64 (2001) 025011 [hep-th/0007188] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    D. Karabali and V. Nair, A gauge invariant Hamiltonian analysis for nonAbelian gauge theories in (2 + 1)-dimensions, Nucl. Phys. B 464 (1996) 135 [hep-th/9510157] [INSPIRE].MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    D. Karabali, C.-j. Kim and V. Nair, Planar Yang-Mills theory: Hamiltonian, regulators and mass gap, Nucl. Phys. B 524 (1998) 661 [hep-th/9705087] [INSPIRE].MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    D. Karabali, C.-j. Kim and V. Nair, On the vacuum wave function and string tension of Yang-Mills theories in (2 + 1)-dimensions, Phys. Lett. B 434 (1998) 103 [hep-th/9804132] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    A. Agarwal, Mass deformation of super Yang-Mills in D = 2 + 1, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 105020 [arXiv:0909.0959] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    A.M. Polyakov and P. Wiegmann, Goldstone fields in two-dimensions with multivalued actions, Phys. Lett. B 141 (1984) 223 [INSPIRE].MathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    A. Armoni, Y. Frishman and J. Sonnenschein, Massless QC D2 from current constituents, Nucl. Phys. B 596 (2001) 459 [hep-th/0011043] [INSPIRE].MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    A. Armoni, Y. Frishman and J. Sonnenschein, Screening in supersymmetric gauge theories in two-dimensions, Phys. Lett. B 449 (1999) 76 [hep-th/9807022] [INSPIRE].MathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    D.J. Gross, I.R. Klebanov, A.V. Matytsin and A.V. Smilga, Screening versus confinement in (1 + 1)-dimensions, Nucl. Phys. B 461 (1996) 109 [hep-th/9511104] [INSPIRE].MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    V.P. Nair, Quantum field theory: A modern perspective, Springer, New York U.S.A. (2005), pg. 557.MATHGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    A. Agarwal, Mass deformations of super Yang-Mills theories in D = 2 + 1 and super-membranes: a note, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 24 (2009) 193 [arXiv:0806.4292] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    J.A. Minahan and A.P. Polychronakos, Equivalence of two-dimensional QCD and the C = 1 matrix model, Phys. Lett. B 312 (1993) 155 [hep-th/9303153] [INSPIRE].MathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    A. Torrielli, Yangians, S-matrices and AdS/CFT, J. Phys. A 44 (2011) 263001 [arXiv:1104.2474] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    A. Torrielli, Review of AdS/CFT Integrability, Chapter VI.2: Yangian Algebra, Lett. Math. Phys. 99 (2012) 547 [arXiv:1012.4005] [INSPIRE].MathSciNetADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    A. Agarwal and S. Rajeev, Yangian symmetries of matrix models and spin chains: The Dilatation operator of N = 4 SYM, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 20 (2005) 5453 [hep-th/0409180] [INSPIRE].MathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    L. Dolan, C.R. Nappi and E. Witten, Yangian symmetry in D = 4 superconformal Yang-Mills theory, hep-th/0401243 [INSPIRE].
  19. [19]
    A. Agarwal and V. Nair, Supersymmetry and mass gap in 2 + 1 dimensions: a gauge invariant Hamiltonian analysis, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 085011 [arXiv:1201.6609] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    S.R. Coleman and J. Mandula, All possible symmetries of the S matrix, Phys. Rev. 159 (1967) 1251 [INSPIRE].ADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© SISSA, Trieste, Italy 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.American Physical SocietyRidgeUSA

Personalised recommendations