Advertisement

On genera of curves from high-loop generalized unitarity cuts

  • Rijun Huang
  • Yang Zhang
Article

Abstract

Generalized unitarity cut of a Feynman diagram generates an algebraic system of polynomial equations. At high-loop levels, these equations may define a complex curve or a (hyper-)surface with complicated topology. We study the curve cases, i.e., a 4-dimensional L-loop diagram with (4L−1) cuts. The topology of a complex curve is classified by its genus. Hence in this paper, we use computational algebraic geometry to calculate the genera of curves from two and three-loop unitarity cuts. The global structure of degenerate on-shell equations under some specific kinematic configurations is also sketched. The genus information can also be used to judge if a unitary cut solution could be rationally parameterized.

Keywords

Scattering Amplitudes QCD Differential and Algebraic Geometry 

References

  1. [1]
    R. Britto, F. Cachazo and B. Feng, New recursion relations for tree amplitudes of gluons, Nucl. Phys. B 715 (2005) 499 [hep-th/0412308] [INSPIRE].MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    R. Britto, F. Cachazo, B. Feng and E. Witten, Direct proof of tree-level recursion relation in Yang-Mills theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 (2005) 181602 [hep-th/0501052] [INSPIRE].MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    L.D. Landau, On analytic properties of vertex parts in quantum field theory, Nucl. Phys. 13 (1959) 181 [INSPIRE].CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    S. Mandelstam, Determination of the pion-nucleon scattering amplitude from dispersion relations and unitarity. General theory, Phys. Rev. 112 (1958) 1344 [INSPIRE].MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    S. Mandelstam, Analytic properties of transition amplitudes in perturbation theory, Phys. Rev. 115 (1959) 1741 [INSPIRE].MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    R. Cutkosky, Singularities and discontinuities of Feynman amplitudes, J. Math. Phys. 1 (1960) 429 [INSPIRE].MathSciNetADSCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Z. Bern, L.J. Dixon, D.C. Dunbar and D.A. Kosower, Fusing gauge theory tree amplitudes into loop amplitudes, Nucl. Phys. B 435 (1995) 59 [hep-ph/9409265] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Z. Bern, L.J. Dixon, D.C. Dunbar and D.A. Kosower, One loop n-point gauge theory amplitudes, unitarity and collinear limits, Nucl. Phys. B 425 (1994) 217 [hep-ph/9403226] [INSPIRE].MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    N. Arkani-Hamed, F. Cachazo and J. Kaplan, What is the simplest quantum field theory?, JHEP 09 (2010) 016 [arXiv:0808.1446] [INSPIRE].MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    C. Anastasiou, R. Britto, B. Feng, Z. Kunszt and P. Mastrolia, D-dimensional unitarity cut method, Phys. Lett. B 645 (2007) 213 [hep-ph/0609191] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    C. Anastasiou, R. Britto, B. Feng, Z. Kunszt and P. Mastrolia, Unitarity cuts and reduction to master integrals in d dimensions for one-loop amplitudes, JHEP 03 (2007) 111 [hep-ph/0612277] [INSPIRE].MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    R. Britto, Loop amplitudes in gauge theories: modern analytic approaches, J. Phys. A 44 (2011) 454006 [arXiv:1012.4493] [INSPIRE].MathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    R. Britto, F. Cachazo and B. Feng, Generalized unitarity and one-loop amplitudes in N = 4 super-Yang-Mills, Nucl. Phys. B 725 (2005) 275 [hep-th/0412103] [INSPIRE].MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    R. Britto, E. Buchbinder, F. Cachazo and B. Feng, One-loop amplitudes of gluons in SQCD, Phys. Rev. D 72 (2005) 065012 [hep-ph/0503132] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    F. Tkachov, A theorem on analytical calculability of four loop renormalization group functions, Phys. Lett. B 100 (1981) 65 [INSPIRE].MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    K. Chetyrkin and F. Tkachov, Integration by parts: the algorithm to calculate β-functions in 4 loops, Nucl. Phys. B 192 (1981) 159 [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    S. Laporta, Calculation of master integrals by difference equations, Phys. Lett. B 504 (2001) 188 [hep-ph/0102032] [INSPIRE].MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    S. Laporta, High precision calculation of multiloop Feynman integrals by difference equations, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 15 (2000) 5087 [hep-ph/0102033] [INSPIRE].MathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    G. Ossola, C.G. Papadopoulos and R. Pittau, Reducing full one-loop amplitudes to scalar integrals at the integrand level, Nucl. Phys. B 763 (2007) 147 [hep-ph/0609007] [INSPIRE].MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    D. Forde, Direct extraction of one-loop integral coefficients, Phys. Rev. D 75 (2007) 125019 [arXiv:0704.1835] [INSPIRE].MathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    R.K. Ellis, W. Giele and Z. Kunszt, A numerical unitarity formalism for evaluating one-loop amplitudes, JHEP 03 (2008) 003 [arXiv:0708.2398] [INSPIRE].MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    W.B. Kilgore, One-loop integral coefficients from generalized unitarity, arXiv:0711.5015 [INSPIRE].
  23. [23]
    W.T. Giele, Z. Kunszt and K. Melnikov, Full one-loop amplitudes from tree amplitudes, JHEP 04 (2008) 049 [arXiv:0801.2237] [INSPIRE].MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    G. Ossola, C.G. Papadopoulos and R. Pittau, On the rational terms of the one-loop amplitudes, JHEP 05 (2008) 004 [arXiv:0802.1876] [INSPIRE].MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    S. Badger, Direct extraction of one loop rational terms, JHEP 01 (2009) 049 [arXiv:0806.4600] [INSPIRE].MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    J. Gluza, K. Kajda and D.A. Kosower, Towards a basis for planar two-loop integrals, Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 045012 [arXiv:1009.0472] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    D.A. Kosower and K.J. Larsen, Maximal unitarity at two loops, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 045017 [arXiv:1108.1180] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  28. [28]
    K.J. Larsen, Global poles of the two-loop six-point N = 4 SYM integrand, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 085032 [arXiv:1205.0297] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  29. [29]
    S. Caron-Huot and K.J. Larsen, Uniqueness of two-loop master contours, JHEP 10 (2012) 026 [arXiv:1205.0801] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. [30]
    R.H. Kleiss, I. Malamos, C.G. Papadopoulos and R. Verheyen, Counting to one: reducibility of one- and two-loop amplitudes at the integrand level, JHEP 12 (2012) 038 [arXiv:1206.4180] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. [31]
    H. Johansson, D.A. Kosower and K.J. Larsen, Two-loop maximal unitarity with external masses, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 025030 [arXiv:1208.1754] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  32. [32]
    H. Johansson, D.A. Kosower and K.J. Larsen, An overview of maximal unitarity at two loops, PoS(LL2012)066 [arXiv:1212.2132] [INSPIRE].
  33. [33]
    P. Mastrolia and G. Ossola, On the integrand-reduction method for two-loop scattering amplitudes, JHEP 11 (2011) 014 [arXiv:1107.6041] [INSPIRE].MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. [34]
    S. Badger, H. Frellesvig and Y. Zhang, Hepta-cuts of two-loop scattering amplitudes, JHEP 04 (2012) 055 [arXiv:1202.2019] [INSPIRE].MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. [35]
    Y. Zhang, Integrand-level reduction of loop amplitudes by computational algebraic geometry methods, JHEP 09 (2012) 042 [arXiv:1205.5707] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. [36]
    P. Mastrolia, E. Mirabella, G. Ossola and T. Peraro, Scattering amplitudes from multivariate polynomial division, Phys. Lett. B 718 (2012) 173 [arXiv:1205.7087] [INSPIRE].MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. [37]
    B. Feng and R. Huang, The classification of two-loop integrand basis in pure four-dimension, JHEP 02 (2013) 117 [arXiv:1209.3747] [INSPIRE].MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. [38]
    P. Mastrolia, E. Mirabella, G. Ossola and T. Peraro, Integrand-reduction for two-loop scattering amplitudes through multivariate polynomial division, arXiv:1209.4319 [INSPIRE].
  39. [39]
    P. Mastrolia, E. Mirabella, G. Ossola, T. Peraro and H. van Deurzen, The integrand reduction of one- and two-loop scattering amplitudes, PoS(LL2012)028 [arXiv:1209.5678] [INSPIRE].
  40. [40]
    S. Badger, H. Frellesvig and Y. Zhang, An integrand reconstruction method for three-loop amplitudes, JHEP 08 (2012) 065 [arXiv:1207.2976] [INSPIRE].MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. [41]
    R. Hartshorne, Algebraic geometry, Graduate Texts in Mathematics 52, Springer-Verlag, New York U.S.A. (1977).Google Scholar
  42. [42]
    D. Perrin, Algebraic geometry: an introduction, translated from the 1995 french original by C. Maclean, Universitext, Springer-Verlag Ltd., London U.K. (2008).Google Scholar
  43. [43]
    D.R. Grayson and M.E. Stillman, Macaulay2, a software system for research in algebraic geometry, available at http://www.math.uiuc.edu/Macaulay2/.
  44. [44]
    D. Cox, J. Little and D. O’Shea, Ideals, varieties, and algorithms: an introduction to computational algebraic geometry and commutative algebra, third ed., Undergraduate Texts in Mathematics, Springer, New York U.S.A. (2007).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© SISSA, Trieste, Italy 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Niels Bohr International Academy and Discovery CenterThe Niels Bohr InstituteCopenhagen ØDenmark

Personalised recommendations