Advertisement

NNLO predictions for Z-boson pair production at the LHC

  • G. Heinrich
  • S. Jahn
  • S. P. Jones
  • M. Kerner
  • J. Pires
Open Access
Regular Article - Theoretical Physics
First Online:
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:

Abstract

We present a calculation of the NNLO QCD corrections to Z-boson pair production at hadron colliders, based on the N-jettiness method for the real radiation parts. We discuss the size and shape of the perturbative corrections along with their associated scale uncertainties and compare our results to recent LHC data at \( \sqrt{s}=13 \) TeV.

Keywords

NLO Computations QCD Phenomenology 
Download to read the full article text

Notes

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

References

  1. [1]
    ATLAS and CMS collaborations, Combination of results from the ATLAS and CMS experiments on anomalous triple gauge couplings in ZZ production from pp collisions at a centre-of-mass energy of 7 TeV at the LHC, ATLAS-CONF-2016-036 (2016) [CMS-PAS-SMP-15-001] [INSPIRE].
  2. [2]
    CMS collaboration, Measurement of W + W − and ZZ production cross sections in pp collisions at \( \sqrt{s}=8 \) TeV, Phys. Lett. B 721 (2013) 190 [arXiv:1301.4698] [INSPIRE].
  3. [3]
    CMS collaboration, Measurements of the ZZ production cross sections in the 2l2ν channel in proton-proton collisions at \( \sqrt{s}=7 \) and 8 TeV and combined constraints on triple gauge couplings, Eur. Phys. J. C 75 (2015) 511 [arXiv:1503.05467] [INSPIRE].
  4. [4]
    ATLAS collaboration, Measurement of the ZZ production cross section in proton-proton collisions at \( \sqrt{s}=8 \) TeV using the ZZ → ℓ − ℓ + ℓ′− ℓ′+ and \( ZZ\to {\ell}^{-}{\ell}^{+}\nu \overline{\nu} \) channels with the ATLAS detector, JHEP 01 (2017) 099 [arXiv:1610.07585] [INSPIRE].
  5. [5]
    ATLAS collaboration, Measurement of the ZZ Production Cross Section in pp Collisions at \( \sqrt{s}=13 \) TeV with the ATLAS Detector, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (2016) 101801 [arXiv:1512.05314] [INSPIRE].
  6. [6]
    CMS collaboration, Measurement of the ZZ production cross section and Z → ℓ + ℓ − ℓ ′+ ℓ ′− branching fraction in pp collisions at \( \sqrt{s}=13 \) TeV, Phys. Lett. B 763 (2016) 280 [Erratum ibid. B 772 (2017) 884] [arXiv:1607.08834] [INSPIRE].
  7. [7]
    ATLAS collaboration, ZZ → ℓ + ℓ − ℓ ′+ ℓ ′− cross-section measurements and search for anomalous triple gauge couplings in 13 TeV pp collisions with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 032005 [arXiv:1709.07703] [INSPIRE].
  8. [8]
    CMS collaboration, Measurements of the pp → ZZ production cross section and the Z →4ℓ branching fraction and constraints on anomalous triple gauge couplings at \( \sqrt{s}=13 \) TeV, Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (2018) 165 [arXiv:1709.08601] [INSPIRE].
  9. [9]
    ATLAS collaboration, Search for heavy ZZ resonances in the ℓ + ℓ − ℓ + ℓ − and \( {\ell}^{+}{\ell}^{-}\nu \overline{\nu} \) final states using proton-proton collisions at \( \sqrt{s}=13 \) TeV with the ATLAS detector, ATLAS-CONF-2017-058 (2017) [INSPIRE].
  10. [10]
    J. Ohnemus and J.F. Owens, An Order-α s calculation of hadronic ZZ production, Phys. Rev. D 43 (1991) 3626 [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    B. Mele, P. Nason and G. Ridolfi, QCD radiative corrections to Z boson pair production in hadronic collisions, Nucl. Phys. B 357 (1991) 409 [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    J. Ohnemus, Hadronic ZZ, W − W + and W ± Z production with QCD corrections and leptonic decays, Phys. Rev. D 50 (1994) 1931 [hep-ph/9403331] [INSPIRE].
  13. [13]
    J.M. Campbell and R.K. Ellis, An Update on vector boson pair production at hadron colliders, Phys. Rev. D 60 (1999) 113006 [hep-ph/9905386] [INSPIRE].
  14. [14]
    L.J. Dixon, Z. Kunszt and A. Signer, Vector boson pair production in hadronic collisions at O(α s): Lepton correlations and anomalous couplings, Phys. Rev. D 60 (1999) 114037 [hep-ph/9907305] [INSPIRE].
  15. [15]
    D.A. Dicus, C. Kao and W.W. Repko, Gluon Production of Gauge Bosons, Phys. Rev. D 36 (1987) 1570 [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    E.W.N. Glover and J.J. van der Bij, Z-boson pair production via gluon fusion, Nucl. Phys. B 321 (1989) 561 [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    T. Matsuura and J.J. van der Bij, Characteristics of leptonic signals for Z boson pairs at hadron colliders, Z. Phys. C 51 (1991) 259 [INSPIRE].Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    C. Zecher, T. Matsuura and J.J. van der Bij, Leptonic signals from off-shell Z boson pairs at hadron colliders, Z. Phys. C 64 (1994) 219 [hep-ph/9404295] [INSPIRE].
  19. [19]
    T. Binoth, N. Kauer and P. Mertsch, Gluon-induced QCD corrections to \( pp\to ZZ\to \ell \overline{\ell}{\ell}^{\prime }{\overline{\ell}}^{\prime } \), in proceedings of the 16th International Workshop on Deep Inelastic Scattering and Related Subjects (DIS 2008), London, U.K., 7–11 April 2008, Science Wise Publishing, Berlin Germany (2008), p. 142 [arXiv:0807.0024] [INSPIRE].
  20. [20]
    J.M. Campbell, R.K. Ellis and C. Williams, Vector boson pair production at the LHC, JHEP 07 (2011) 018 [arXiv:1105.0020] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    N. Kauer, Interference effects for \( H\to WW/ZZ\to \ell {\overline{\nu}}_{\ell}\overline{\ell}{\nu}_{\ell } \) searches in gluon fusion at the LHC, JHEP 12 (2013) 082 [arXiv:1310.7011] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    F. Cascioli, S. Höche, F. Krauss, P. Maierhöfer, S. Pozzorini and F. Siegert, Precise Higgs-background predictions: merging NLO QCD and squared quark-loop corrections to four-lepton + 0, 1 jet production, JHEP 01 (2014) 046 [arXiv:1309.0500] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    J.M. Campbell, R.K. Ellis and C. Williams, Bounding the Higgs width at the LHC using full analytic results for gg → e − e + μ − μ +, JHEP 04 (2014) 060 [arXiv:1311.3589] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    N. Kauer, C. O’Brien and E. Vryonidou, Interference effects for \( H\to WW\to \ell \nu q\overline{q}^{\prime } \) and \( H\to ZZ\to \ell \overline{\ell}q\overline{q} \) searches in gluon fusion at the LHC, JHEP 10 (2015) 074 [arXiv:1506.01694] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    C.S. Li, H.T. Li, D.Y. Shao and J. Wang, Soft gluon resummation in the signal-background interference process of gg(→ h *) → ZZ, JHEP 08 (2015) 065 [arXiv:1504.02388] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    T. Gehrmann, A. von Manteuffel, L. Tancredi and E. Weihs, The two-loop master integrals for \( q\overline{q}\to VV \), JHEP 06 (2014) 032 [arXiv:1404.4853] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    F. Caola, J.M. Henn, K. Melnikov and V.A. Smirnov, Non-planar master integrals for the production of two off-shell vector bosons in collisions of massless partons, JHEP 09 (2014) 043 [arXiv:1404.5590] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. [28]
    T. Gehrmann, A. von Manteuffel and L. Tancredi, The two-loop helicity amplitudes for \( q{\overline{q}}^{\prime}\to {V}_1{V}_2\to\ 4 \) leptons, JHEP 09 (2015) 128 [arXiv:1503.04812] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. [29]
    A. von Manteuffel and L. Tancredi, The two-loop helicity amplitudes for gg → V 1 V 2 → 4 leptons, JHEP 06 (2015) 197 [arXiv:1503.08835] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. [30]
    F. Caola, J.M. Henn, K. Melnikov, A.V. Smirnov and V.A. Smirnov, Two-loop helicity amplitudes for the production of two off-shell electroweak bosons in gluon fusion, JHEP 06 (2015) 129 [arXiv:1503.08759] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. [31]
    F. Cascioli et al., ZZ production at hadron colliders in NNLO QCD, Phys. Lett. B 735 (2014) 311 [arXiv:1405.2219] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. [32]
    M. Grazzini, S. Kallweit and D. Rathlev, ZZ production at the LHC: fiducial cross sections and distributions in NNLO QCD, Phys. Lett. B 750 (2015) 407 [arXiv:1507.06257] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. [33]
    F. Caola, K. Melnikov, R. Röntsch and L. Tancredi, QCD corrections to ZZ production in gluon fusion at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 094028 [arXiv:1509.06734] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  34. [34]
    F. Caola, M. Dowling, K. Melnikov, R. Röntsch and L. Tancredi, QCD corrections to vector boson pair production in gluon fusion including interference effects with off-shell Higgs at the LHC, JHEP 07 (2016) 087 [arXiv:1605.04610] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. [35]
    S. Alioli, F. Caola, G. Luisoni and R. Röntsch, ZZ production in gluon fusion at NLO matched to parton-shower, Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 034042 [arXiv:1609.09719] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  36. [36]
    E. Accomando, A. Denner and A. Kaiser, Logarithmic electroweak corrections to gauge-boson pair production at the LHC, Nucl. Phys. B 706 (2005) 325 [hep-ph/0409247] [INSPIRE].
  37. [37]
    A. Bierweiler, T. Kasprzik and J.H. Kühn, Vector-boson pair production at the LHC to \( \mathcal{O}\left({\alpha}^3\right) \) accuracy, JHEP 12 (2013) 071 [arXiv:1305.5402] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. [38]
    J. Baglio, L.D. Ninh and M.M. Weber, Massive gauge boson pair production at the LHC: a next-to-leading order story, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 113005 [Erratum ibid. D 94 (2016) 099902] [arXiv:1307.4331] [INSPIRE].
  39. [39]
    S. Gieseke, T. Kasprzik and J.H. Kühn, Vector-boson pair production and electroweak corrections in HERWIG++, Eur. Phys. J. C 74 (2014) 2988 [arXiv:1401.3964] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. [40]
    B. Biedermann, Full NLO electroweak corrections to Z-boson pair production at the Large Hadron Collider, PoS(DIS2017)168 [arXiv:1707.01029] [INSPIRE].
  41. [41]
    B. Biedermann, A. Denner, S. Dittmaier, L. Hofer and B. Jäger, Electroweak corrections to pp → μ + μ − e + e − + X at the LHC: a Higgs background study, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (2016) 161803 [arXiv:1601.07787] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. [42]
    B. Biedermann, A. Denner, S. Dittmaier, L. Hofer and B. Jäger, Next-to-leading-order electroweak corrections to the production of four charged leptons at the LHC, JHEP 01 (2017) 033 [arXiv:1611.05338] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. [43]
    S. Catani and M. Grazzini, An NNLO subtraction formalism in hadron collisions and its application to Higgs boson production at the LHC, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 (2007) 222002 [hep-ph/0703012] [INSPIRE].
  44. [44]
    R. Boughezal, C. Focke, X. Liu and F. Petriello, W-boson production in association with a jet at next-to-next-to-leading order in perturbative QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (2015) 062002 [arXiv:1504.02131] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. [45]
    J. Gaunt, M. Stahlhofen, F.J. Tackmann and J.R. Walsh, N-jettiness Subtractions for NNLO QCD Calculations, JHEP 09 (2015) 058 [arXiv:1505.04794] [INSPIRE].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. [46]
    K. Melnikov and M. Dowling, Production of two Z-bosons in gluon fusion in the heavy top quark approximation, Phys. Lett. B 744 (2015) 43 [arXiv:1503.01274] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. [47]
    J.M. Campbell, R.K. Ellis, M. Czakon and S. Kirchner, Two loop correction to interference in gg → ZZ, JHEP 08 (2016) 011 [arXiv:1605.01380] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. [48]
    J. Gao, C.S. Li and H.X. Zhu, Top Quark Decay at Next-to-Next-to Leading Order in QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 (2013) 042001 [arXiv:1210.2808] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. [49]
    R. Boughezal, C. Focke, W. Giele, X. Liu and F. Petriello, Higgs boson production in association with a jet at NNLO using jettiness subtraction, Phys. Lett. B 748 (2015) 5 [arXiv:1505.03893] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. [50]
    I.W. Stewart, F.J. Tackmann and W.J. Waalewijn, Factorization at the LHC: From PDFs to Initial State Jets, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 094035 [arXiv:0910.0467] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  51. [51]
    I.W. Stewart, F.J. Tackmann and W.J. Waalewijn, N-Jettiness: An Inclusive Event Shape to Veto Jets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 (2010) 092002 [arXiv:1004.2489] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. [52]
    I. Moult, L. Rothen, I.W. Stewart, F.J. Tackmann and H.X. Zhu, Subleading Power Corrections for N-Jettiness Subtractions, Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 074023 [arXiv:1612.00450] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  53. [53]
    W.T. Giele, E.W.N. Glover and D.A. Kosower, Higher order corrections to jet cross-sections in hadron colliders, Nucl. Phys. B 403 (1993) 633 [hep-ph/9302225] [INSPIRE].
  54. [54]
    S. Alioli et al., Combining Higher-Order Resummation with Multiple NLO Calculations and Parton Showers in GENEVA, JHEP 09 (2013) 120 [arXiv:1211.7049] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. [55]
    S. Alioli, C.W. Bauer, C. Berggren, F.J. Tackmann, J.R. Walsh and S. Zuberi, Matching Fully Differential NNLO Calculations and Parton Showers, JHEP 06 (2014) 089 [arXiv:1311.0286] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. [56]
    C.W. Bauer, S. Fleming and M.E. Luke, Summing Sudakov logarithms in B → X s γ in effective field theory, Phys. Rev. D 63 (2000) 014006 [hep-ph/0005275] [INSPIRE].
  57. [57]
    J.R. Gaunt, M. Stahlhofen and F.J. Tackmann, The Quark Beam Function at Two Loops, JHEP 04 (2014) 113 [arXiv:1401.5478] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. [58]
    R. Kelley, M.D. Schwartz, R.M. Schabinger and H.X. Zhu, The two-loop hemisphere soft function, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 045022 [arXiv:1105.3676] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  59. [59]
    P.F. Monni, T. Gehrmann and G. Luisoni, Two-Loop Soft Corrections and Resummation of the Thrust Distribution in the Dijet Region, JHEP 08 (2011) 010 [arXiv:1105.4560] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  60. [60]
    T. Becher and M. Neubert, Infrared singularities of scattering amplitudes in perturbative QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 (2009) 162001 [Erratum ibid. 111 (2013) 199905] [arXiv:0901.0722] [INSPIRE].
  61. [61]
    T. Becher and M. Neubert, On the Structure of Infrared Singularities of Gauge-Theory Amplitudes, JHEP 06 (2009) 081 [Erratum JHEP 11 (2013) 024] [arXiv:0903.1126] [INSPIRE].
  62. [62]
    J.M. Campbell, R.K. Ellis, Y. Li and C. Williams, Predictions for diphoton production at the LHC through NNLO in QCD, JHEP 07 (2016) 148 [arXiv:1603.02663] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. [63]
    S. Catani, L. Cieri, D. de Florian, G. Ferrera and M. Grazzini, Universality of transverse-momentum resummation and hard factors at the NNLO, Nucl. Phys. B 881 (2014) 414 [arXiv:1311.1654] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  64. [64]
    S. Catani, The Singular behavior of QCD amplitudes at two loop order, Phys. Lett. B 427 (1998) 161 [hep-ph/9802439] [INSPIRE].
  65. [65]
    J. Baglio et al., VBFNLO: A Parton Level Monte Carlo for Processes with Electroweak Bosons — Manual for Version 2.7.0, arXiv:1107.4038 [INSPIRE].
  66. [66]
    F. Campanario, M. Kerner, L.D. Ninh and D. Zeppenfeld, Next-to-leading order QCD corrections to ZZ production in association with two jets, JHEP 07 (2014) 148 [arXiv:1405.3972] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. [67]
    J. Alwall et al., The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections and their matching to parton shower simulations, JHEP 07 (2014) 079 [arXiv:1405.0301] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. [68]
    G. Cullen et al., Automated One-Loop Calculations with GoSam, Eur. Phys. J. C 72 (2012) 1889 [arXiv:1111.2034] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. [69]
    G. Cullen et al., GoSam-2.0: a tool for automated one-loop calculations within the Standard Model and beyond, Eur. Phys. J. C 74 (2014) 3001 [arXiv:1404.7096] [INSPIRE].
  70. [70]
    F. Cascioli, P. Maierhofer and S. Pozzorini, Scattering Amplitudes with Open Loops, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (2012) 111601 [arXiv:1111.5206] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. [71]
    P. Nogueira, Automatic Feynman graph generation, J. Comput. Phys. 105 (1993) 279 [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  72. [72]
    J. Kuipers, T. Ueda, J.A.M. Vermaseren and J. Vollinga, FORM version 4.0, Comput. Phys. Commun. 184 (2013) 1453 [arXiv:1203.6543] [INSPIRE].
  73. [73]
    G. Cullen, M. Koch-Janusz and T. Reiter, Spinney: A Form Library for Helicity Spinors, Comput. Phys. Commun. 182 (2011) 2368 [arXiv:1008.0803] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  74. [74]
    P. Mastrolia, G. Ossola, T. Reiter and F. Tramontano, Scattering amplitudes from unitarity-based reduction algorithm at the integrand-level, JHEP 08 (2010) 080 [arXiv:1006.0710] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  75. [75]
    T. Binoth, J.P. Guillet, G. Heinrich, E. Pilon and T. Reiter, Golem95: A Numerical program to calculate one-loop tensor integrals with up to six external legs, Comput. Phys. Commun. 180 (2009) 2317 [arXiv:0810.0992] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  76. [76]
    G. Cullen et al., Golem95C: A library for one-loop integrals with complex masses, Comput. Phys. Commun. 182 (2011) 2276 [arXiv:1101.5595] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  77. [77]
    J.P. Guillet, G. Heinrich and J.F. von Soden-Fraunhofen, Tools for NLO automation: extension of the golem95C integral library, Comput. Phys. Commun. 185 (2014) 1828 [arXiv:1312.3887] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  78. [78]
    H. van Deurzen, G. Luisoni, P. Mastrolia, E. Mirabella, G. Ossola and T. Peraro, Multi-leg One-loop Massive Amplitudes from Integrand Reduction via Laurent Expansion, JHEP 03 (2014) 115 [arXiv:1312.6678] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. [79]
    T. Peraro, Ninja: Automated Integrand Reduction via Laurent Expansion for One-Loop Amplitudes, Comput. Phys. Commun. 185 (2014) 2771 [arXiv:1403.1229] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  80. [80]
    A. van Hameren, OneLOop: For the evaluation of one-loop scalar functions, Comput. Phys. Commun. 182 (2011) 2427 [arXiv:1007.4716] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  81. [81]
    A. Gehrmann-De Ridder, T. Gehrmann and E.W.N. Glover, Antenna subtraction at NNLO, JHEP 09 (2005) 056 [hep-ph/0505111] [INSPIRE].
  82. [82]
    E.W.N. Glover and J. Pires, Antenna subtraction for gluon scattering at NNLO, JHEP 06 (2010) 096 [arXiv:1003.2824] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  83. [83]
    J. Currie, E.W.N. Glover and S. Wells, Infrared Structure at NNLO Using Antenna Subtraction, JHEP 04 (2013) 066 [arXiv:1301.4693] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. [84]
    A. Daleo, T. Gehrmann and D. Maître, Antenna subtraction with hadronic initial states, JHEP 04 (2007) 016 [hep-ph/0612257] [INSPIRE].
  85. [85]
    A. Daleo, A. Gehrmann-De Ridder, T. Gehrmann and G. Luisoni, Antenna subtraction at NNLO with hadronic initial states: initial-final configurations, JHEP 01 (2010) 118 [arXiv:0912.0374] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  86. [86]
    A. Gehrmann-De Ridder, T. Gehrmann and M. Ritzmann, Antenna subtraction at NNLO with hadronic initial states: double real initial-initial configurations, JHEP 10 (2012) 047 [arXiv:1207.5779] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  87. [87]
    A. Gehrmann-De Ridder, T. Gehrmann, E.W.N. Glover, A. Huss and T.A. Morgan, The NNLO QCD corrections to Z boson production at large transverse momentum, JHEP 07 (2016) 133 [arXiv:1605.04295] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. [88]
    X. Chen, J. Cruz-Martinez, T. Gehrmann, E.W.N. Glover and M. Jaquier, NNLO QCD corrections to Higgs boson production at large transverse momentum, JHEP 10 (2016) 066 [arXiv:1607.08817] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. [89]
    J. Currie, E.W.N. Glover and J. Pires, Next-to-Next-to Leading Order QCD Predictions for Single Jet Inclusive Production at the LHC, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 (2017) 072002 [arXiv:1611.01460] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. [90]
    J. Currie, A. Gehrmann-De Ridder, T. Gehrmann, E.W.N. Glover, A. Huss and J. Pires, Precise predictions for dijet production at the LHC, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 (2017) 152001 [arXiv:1705.10271] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. [91]
    M. Czakon, A novel subtraction scheme for double-real radiation at NNLO, Phys. Lett. B 693 (2010) 259 [arXiv:1005.0274] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. [92]
    R. Boughezal, F. Caola, K. Melnikov, F. Petriello and M. Schulze, Higgs boson production in association with a jet at next-to-next-to-leading order in perturbative QCD, JHEP 06 (2013) 072 [arXiv:1302.6216] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. [93]
    M. Czakon and D. Heymes, Four-dimensional formulation of the sector-improved residue subtraction scheme, Nucl. Phys. B 890 (2014) 152 [arXiv:1408.2500] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  94. [94]
    F. Caola, K. Melnikov and R. Röntsch, Nested soft-collinear subtractions in NNLO QCD computations, Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017) 248 [arXiv:1702.01352] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. [95]
    V. Del Duca, C. Duhr, G. Somogyi, F. Tramontano and Z. Trócsányi, Higgs boson decay into b-quarks at NNLO accuracy, JHEP 04 (2015) 036 [arXiv:1501.07226] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. [96]
    G. Somogyi, A. Kardos, Z. Szőr and Z. Trócsányi, Higher order corrections in the CoLoRFulNNLO framework, Acta Phys. Polon. B 48 (2017) 1195 [arXiv:1706.01688] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. [97]
    R. Bonciani, S. Catani, M. Grazzini, H. Sargsyan and A. Torre, The q T subtraction method for top quark production at hadron colliders, Eur. Phys. J. C 75 (2015) 581 [arXiv:1508.03585] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. [98]
    R. Boughezal et al., Z-boson production in association with a jet at next-to-next-to-leading order in perturbative QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (2016) 152001 [arXiv:1512.01291] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. [99]
    J.M. Campbell, R.K. Ellis and C. Williams, Associated production of a Higgs boson at NNLO, JHEP 06 (2016) 179 [arXiv:1601.00658] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. [100]
    R. Boughezal, X. Liu and F. Petriello, W-boson plus jet differential distributions at NNLO in QCD, Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 113009 [arXiv:1602.06965] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  101. [101]
    R. Boughezal, X. Liu and F. Petriello, Phenomenology of the Z-boson plus jet process at NNLO, Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 074015 [arXiv:1602.08140] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  102. [102]
    R. Boughezal et al., Color singlet production at NNLO in MCFM, Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017) 7 [arXiv:1605.08011] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. [103]
    J.M. Campbell, R.K. Ellis and C. Williams, Direct Photon Production at Next-to-Next-to-Leading Order, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 (2017) 222001 [arXiv:1612.04333] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. [104]
    J.M. Campbell, R.K. Ellis and C. Williams, Driving missing data at the LHC: NNLO predictions for the ratio of γ + j and Z + j, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 014037 [arXiv:1703.10109] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  105. [105]
    A.D. Martin, W.J. Stirling, R.S. Thorne and G. Watt, Update of parton distributions at NNLO, Phys. Lett. B 652 (2007) 292 [arXiv:0706.0459] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. [106]
    NNPDF collaboration, R.D. Ball et al., Parton distributions for the LHC Run II, JHEP 04 (2015) 040 [arXiv:1410.8849] [INSPIRE].
  107. [107]
    A. Buckley et al., LHAPDF6: parton density access in the LHC precision era, Eur. Phys. J. C 75 (2015) 132 [arXiv:1412.7420] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. [108]
    R. Boughezal, X. Liu and F. Petriello, Power Corrections in the N-jettiness Subtraction Scheme, JHEP 03 (2017) 160 [arXiv:1612.02911] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  109. [109]
    I. Moult, L. Rothen, I.W. Stewart, F.J. Tackmann and H.X. Zhu, N-jettiness subtractions for gg → H at subleading power, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 014013 [arXiv:1710.03227] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Max Planck Institute for PhysicsMünchenGermany

Personalised recommendations