Advertisement

Conformal manifolds: ODEs from OPEs

  • Connor Behan
Open Access
Regular Article - Theoretical Physics

Abstract

The existence of an exactly marginal deformation in a conformal field theory is very special, but it is not well understood how this is reflected in the allowed dimensions and OPE coefficients of local operators. To shed light on this question, we compute perturbative corrections to several observables in an abstract CFT, starting with the beta function. This yields a sum rule that the theory must obey in order to be part of a conformal manifold. The set of constraints relating CFT data at different values of the coupling can in principle be written as a dynamical system that allows one to flow arbitrarily far. We begin the analysis of it by finding a simple form for the differential equations when the spacetime and theory space are both one-dimensional. A useful feature we can immediately observe is that our system makes it very difficult for level crossing to occur.

Keywords

Conformal Field Theory Field Theories in Lower Dimensions Conformal and W Symmetry Nonperturbative Effects 

Notes

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

References

  1. [1]
    C. Behan, L. Rastelli, S. Rychkov and B. Zan, A scaling theory for the long-range to short-range crossover and an infrared duality, J. Phys. A 50 (2017) 354002 [arXiv:1703.05325] [INSPIRE].MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    C. Behan, L. Rastelli, S. Rychkov and B. Zan, Long-range critical exponents near the short-range crossover, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 (2017) 241601 [arXiv:1703.03430] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    R. Rattazzi, V.S. Rychkov, E. Tonni and A. Vichi, Bounding scalar operator dimensions in 4D CFT, JHEP 12 (2008) 031 [arXiv:0807.0004] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    S.J. Gates Jr, M.T. Grisaru, M. Rocek and W. Siegel, Superspace, or one thousand and one lessons in supersymmetry, Front. Phys. 58 (1983) 1 [hep-th/0108200] [INSPIRE].zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    N. Seiberg, Supersymmetry and non-peturbative beta functions, Phys. Lett. B 206 (1988) 75.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    R.G. Leigh and M.J. Strassler, Exactly marginal operators and duality in four-dimensional N = 1 supersymmetric gauge theory, Nucl. Phys. B 447 (1995) 95 [hep-th/9503121] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    M.J. Strassler, On renormalization group flows and exactly marginal operators in three-dimensions, hep-th/9810223 [INSPIRE].
  8. [8]
    C.-M. Chang and X. Yin, Families of Conformal Fixed Points of N = 2 Chern-Simons-Matter Theories, JHEP 05 (2010) 108 [arXiv:1002.0568] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    D. Green, Z. Komargodski, N. Seiberg, Y. Tachikawa and B. Wecht, Exactly marginal deformations and global symmetries, JHEP 06 (2010) 106 [arXiv:1005.3545] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    J. Gomis, P.-S. Hsin, Z. Komargodski, A. Schwimmer, N. Seiberg and S. Theisen, Anomalies, Conformal Manifolds and Spheres, JHEP 03 (2016) 022 [arXiv:1509.08511] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    J. Gomis, Z. Komargodski, H. Ooguri, N. Seiberg and Y. Wang, Shortening Anomalies in Supersymmetric Theories, JHEP 01 (2017) 067 [arXiv:1611.03101] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    M. Buican and T. Nishinaka, Compact Conformal Manifolds, JHEP 01 (2015) 112 [arXiv:1410.3006] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    C. Cordova, T.T. Dumitrescu and K. Intriligator, Multiplets of Superconformal Symmetry in Diverse Dimensions, arXiv:1612.00809 [INSPIRE].
  14. [14]
    K. Ranganathan, H. Sonoda and B. Zwiebach, Connections on the state space over conformal field theories, Nucl. Phys. B 414 (1994) 405 [hep-th/9304053] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    M. Baggio, V. Niarchos and K. Papadodimas, Aspects of Berry phase in QFT, JHEP 04 (2017) 062 [arXiv:1701.05587] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    D. Li, D. Meltzer and D. Poland, Conformal Collider Physics from the Lightcone Bootstrap, JHEP 02 (2016) 143 [arXiv:1511.08025] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    T. Hartman, S. Jain and S. Kundu, A New Spin on Causality Constraints, JHEP 10 (2016) 141 [arXiv:1601.07904] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    D.M. Hofman, D. Li, D. Meltzer, D. Poland and F. Rejon-Barrera, A proof of the conformal collider bounds, JHEP 06 (2016) 011 [arXiv:1603.03711] [INSPIRE].zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    D. Li, D. Meltzer and D. Poland, Conformal Bootstrap in the Regge Limit, JHEP 12 (2017) 013 [arXiv:1705.03453] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    L. Iliesiu, F. Kos, D. Poland, S.S. Pufu, D. Simmons-Duffin and R. Yacoby, Bootstrapping 3D Fermions, JHEP 03 (2016) 120 [arXiv:1508.00012] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    L. Iliesiu, F. Kos, D. Poland, S.S. Pufu and D. Simmons-Duffin, Bootstrapping 3D Fermions with Global Symmetries, JHEP 01 (2018) 036 [arXiv:1705.03484] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    A. Dymarsky, J. Penedones, E. Trevisani and A. Vichi, Charting the space of 3D CFTs with a continuous global symmetry, arXiv:1705.04278 [INSPIRE].
  23. [23]
    A. Dymarsky, F. Kos, P. Kravchuk, D. Poland and D. Simmons-Duffin, The 3d Stress-Tensor Bootstrap, JHEP 02 (2018) 164 [arXiv:1708.05718] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    S. El-Showk and M.F. Paulos, Extremal bootstrapping: go with the flow, arXiv:1605.08087 [INSPIRE].
  25. [25]
    V. Bashmakov, M. Bertolini and H. Raj, On non-supersymmetric conformal manifolds: field theory and holography, JHEP 11 (2017) 167 [arXiv:1709.01749] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    S. Hollands, Operator product expansion algebra, at Local Quantum Physics and beyond — in memorian Rudolf Haag, Hamburg Germany (2016).Google Scholar
  27. [27]
    S. Hollands, Operator product expansion algebra, at Wolfhard Zimmerman memorial symposium, Munich Germany (2017).Google Scholar
  28. [28]
    A.B. Zamolodchikov, Renormalization Group and Perturbation Theory Near Fixed Points in Two-Dimensional Field Theory, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 46 (1987) 1090 [INSPIRE].Google Scholar
  29. [29]
    J.L. Cardy, Scaling and renormalization in statistical physics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge U.K. (1996).CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. [30]
    D. Berenstein and A. Miller, Conformal perturbation theory, dimensional regularization and AdS/CFT correspondence, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 086011 [arXiv:1406.4142] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  31. [31]
    D. Berenstein and A. Miller, Logarithmic enhancements in conformal perturbation theory and their real time interpretation, arXiv:1607.01922 [INSPIRE].
  32. [32]
    Z. Komargodski and D. Simmons-Duffin, The Random-Bond Ising Model in 2.01 and 3 Dimensions, J. Phys. A 50 (2017) 154001 [arXiv:1603.04444] [INSPIRE].
  33. [33]
    A.L. Fitzpatrick, J. Kaplan, D. Poland and D. Simmons-Duffin, The Analytic Bootstrap and AdS Superhorizon Locality, JHEP 12 (2013) 004 [arXiv:1212.3616] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  34. [34]
    Z. Komargodski and A. Zhiboedov, Convexity and Liberation at Large Spin, JHEP 11 (2013) 140 [arXiv:1212.4103] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. [35]
    F. Kos, D. Poland and D. Simmons-Duffin, Bootstrapping the O(N) vector models, JHEP 06 (2014) 091 [arXiv:1307.6856] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. [36]
    M. Hogervorst and S. Rychkov, Radial Coordinates for Conformal Blocks, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 106004 [arXiv:1303.1111] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  37. [37]
    J.L. Cardy, Continuously varrying exponents and the value of the central charge, J. Phys. A 20 (1987) L891.ADSGoogle Scholar
  38. [38]
    N.J.A. Sloane, The online encyclopedia of integer sequences, http://oeis.org.
  39. [39]
    M. Hogervorst and B.C. van Rees, Crossing symmetry in alpha space, JHEP 11 (2017) 193 [arXiv:1702.08471] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  40. [40]
    Y. Tachikawa, N = 2 supersymmetric dynamics for pedestrians Lecture Notes Phys. 890 (2014) 1 [arXiv:1312.2684] [INSPIRE].
  41. [41]
    Z.U. Khandker, D. Li, D. Poland and D. Simmons-Duffin, \( \mathcal{N} \) = 1 superconformal blocks for general scalar operators, JHEP 08 (2014) 049 [arXiv:1404.5300] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. [42]
    Z. Li and N. Su, The Most General 4d \( \mathcal{N} \) = 1 Superconformal Blocks for Scalar Operators, JHEP 05 (2016) 163 [arXiv:1602.07097] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  43. [43]
    M. Cornagliotto, M. Lemos and V. Schomerus, Long Multiplet Bootstrap, JHEP 10 (2017) 119 [arXiv:1702.05101] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  44. [44]
    F.A. Dolan and H. Osborn, Conformal Partial Waves: Further Mathematical Results, arXiv:1108.6194 [INSPIRE].
  45. [45]
    R. Jackiw and S.Y. Pi, Conformal Blocks for the 4-Point Function in Conformal Quantum Mechanics, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 045017 [Erratum ibid. D 86 (2012) 089905] [arXiv:1205.0443] [INSPIRE].
  46. [46]
    D. Mazac, Analytic bounds and emergence of AdS 2 physics from the conformal bootstrap, JHEP 04 (2017) 146 [arXiv:1611.10060] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  47. [47]
    K. Bulycheva, A note on the SYK model with complex fermions, JHEP 12 (2017) 069 [arXiv:1706.07411] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  48. [48]
    C. Beem, L. Rastelli and B.C. van Rees, The \( \mathcal{N} \) = 4 Superconformal Bootstrap, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 (2013) 071601 [arXiv:1304.1803] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. [49]
    G.P. Korchemsky, On level crossing in conformal field theories, JHEP 03 (2016) 212 [arXiv:1512.05362] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  50. [50]
    P. Bouwknegt and K. Schoutens, W symmetry in conformal field theory, Phys. Rept. 223 (1993) 183 [hep-th/9210010] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. [51]
    S. Förste and D. Roggenkamp, Current current deformations of conformal field theories and WZW models, JHEP 05 (2003) 071 [hep-th/0304234] [INSPIRE].MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. [52]
    K. Sen and A. Sinha, On critical exponents without Feynman diagrams, J. Phys. A 49 (2016) 445401 [arXiv:1510.07770] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  53. [53]
    S. Pasterski and S.-H. Shao, Conformal basis for flat space amplitudes, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 065022 [arXiv:1705.01027] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  54. [54]
    W. Li, Inverse Bootstrapping Conformal Field Theories, JHEP 01 (2018) 077 [arXiv:1706.04054] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. [55]
    R. Gopakumar, A. Kaviraj, K. Sen and A. Sinha, Conformal Bootstrap in Mellin Space, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 (2017) 081601 [arXiv:1609.00572] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  56. [56]
    R. Gopakumar, A. Kaviraj, K. Sen and A. Sinha, A Mellin space approach to the conformal bootstrap, JHEP 05 (2017) 027 [arXiv:1611.08407] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  57. [57]
    P. Suchanek, Elliptic recursion for 4-point superconformal blocks and bootstrap in N = 1 SLFT, JHEP 02 (2011) 090 [arXiv:1012.2974] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  58. [58]
    Y.-H. Lin, S.-H. Shao, D. Simmons-Duffin, Y. Wang and X. Yin, \( \mathcal{N} \) = 4 superconformal bootstrap of the K3 CFT, JHEP 05 (2017) 126 [arXiv:1511.04065] [INSPIRE].
  59. [59]
    V. Mitev and E. Pomoni, 2D CFT blocks for the 4D class \( {\mathcal{S}}_k \) theories, JHEP 08 (2017) 009 [arXiv:1703.00736] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  60. [60]
    R. Poghossian, Recurrence relations for the \( {\mathcal{W}}_3 \) conformal blocks and \( \mathcal{N} \) = 2 SYM partition functions, JHEP 11 (2017) 053 [Erratum ibid. 1801 (2018) 088] [arXiv:1705.00629] [INSPIRE].

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.C.N. Yang Institute for Theoretical PhysicsStony Brook UniversityStony BrookU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations