Advertisement

Journal of High Energy Physics

, 2018:49 | Cite as

Marginally trapped surfaces and AdS/CFT

Open Access
Regular Article - Theoretical Physics

Abstract

It has been proposed that the areas of marginally trapped or anti-trapped surfaces (also known as leaves of holographic screens) may encode some notion of entropy. To connect this to AdS/CFT, we study the case of marginally trapped surfaces anchored to an AdS boundary. We establish that such boundary-anchored leaves lie between the causal and extremal surfaces defined by the anchor and that they have area bounded below by that of the minimal extremal surface. This suggests that the area of any leaf represents a coarse-grained von Neumann entropy for the associated region of the dual CFT. We further demonstrate that the leading area-divergence of a boundary-anchored marginally trapped surface agrees with that for the associated extremal surface, though subleading divergences generally differ. Finally, we generalize an argument of Bousso and Engelhardt to show that holographic screens with all leaves anchored to the same boundary set have leaf-areas that increase monotonically along the screen, and we describe a construction through which this monotonicity can take the more standard form of requiring entropy to increase with boundary time. This construction is related to what one might call future causal holographic information, which in such cases also provides an upper bound on the area of the associated leaves.

Keywords

AdS-CFT Correspondence Classical Theories of Gravity Gauge-gravity correspondence 

Notes

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

References

  1. [1]
    S.W. Hawking, Black hole explosions, Nature 248 (1974) 30 [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    J.D. Bekenstein, Generalized second law of thermodynamics in black hole physics, Phys. Rev. D 9 (1974) 3292 [INSPIRE].
  3. [3]
    J.M. Maldacena, The large-N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 38 (1999) 1113 [Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998) 231] [hep-th/9711200] [INSPIRE].
  4. [4]
    S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, Holographic derivation of entanglement entropy from AdS/CFT, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (2006) 181602 [hep-th/0603001] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    V.E. Hubeny, M. Rangamani and T. Takayanagi, A covariant holographic entanglement entropy proposal, JHEP 07 (2007) 062 [arXiv:0705.0016] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    R. Bousso, A covariant entropy conjecture, JHEP 07 (1999) 004 [hep-th/9905177] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    R. Bousso and N. Engelhardt, New area law in general relativity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (2015) 081301 [arXiv:1504.07627] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    R. Bousso and N. Engelhardt, Proof of a new area law in general relativity, Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 044031 [arXiv:1504.07660] [INSPIRE].
  9. [9]
    N. Engelhardt and A.C. Wall, Extremal surface barriers, JHEP 03 (2014) 068 [arXiv:1312.3699] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    A. Ashtekar and B. Krishnan, Dynamical horizons and their properties, Phys. Rev. D 68 (2003) 104030 [gr-qc/0308033] [INSPIRE].
  11. [11]
    S.A. Hayward, General laws of black hole dynamics, Phys. Rev. D 49 (1994) 6467 [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    F. Sanches and S.J. Weinberg, Holographic entanglement entropy conjecture for general spacetimes, Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 084034 [arXiv:1603.05250] [INSPIRE].
  13. [13]
    A.C. Wall, Maximin surfaces and the strong subadditivity of the covariant holographic entanglement entropy, Class. Quant. Grav. 31 (2014) 225007 [arXiv:1211.3494] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    R.M. Wald, General relativity, University of Chicago Press, Chicago U.S.A. (1984).Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    V.E. Hubeny and M. Rangamani, Causal holographic information, JHEP 06 (2012) 114 [arXiv:1204.1698] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    B. Freivogel and B. Mosk, Properties of causal holographic information, JHEP 09 (2013) 100 [arXiv:1304.7229] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    W.R. Kelly and A.C. Wall, Coarse-grained entropy and causal holographic information in AdS/CFT, JHEP 03 (2014) 118 [arXiv:1309.3610] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    N. Engelhardt and A.C. Wall, No simple dual to the causal holographic information?, JHEP 04 (2017) 134 [arXiv:1702.01748] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    C. Fefferman and C.R. Graham, Conformal invariants, Elie Cartan et les Mathematiques d’aujourd’hui, Asterisque (1985) 95.Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    N. Engelhardt and A.C. Wall, Decoding the apparent horizon: a coarse-grained holographic entropy, arXiv:1706.02038.
  21. [21]
    W. Bunting, Z. Fu and D. Marolf, A coarse-grained generalized second law for holographic conformal field theories, Class. Quant. Grav. 33 (2016) 055008 [arXiv:1509.00074] [INSPIRE].
  22. [22]
    R. Bousso, Holography in general space-times, JHEP 06 (1999) 028 [hep-th/9906022] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    T. Faulkner, A. Lewkowycz and J. Maldacena, Quantum corrections to holographic entanglement entropy, JHEP 11 (2013) 074 [arXiv:1307.2892] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    N. Engelhardt and A.C. Wall, Quantum extremal surfaces: holographic entanglement entropy beyond the classical regime, JHEP 01 (2015) 073 [arXiv:1408.3203] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    D.L. Jafferis, A. Lewkowycz, J. Maldacena and S.J. Suh, Relative entropy equals bulk relative entropy, JHEP 06 (2016) 004 [arXiv:1512.06431] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    X. Dong and A. Lewkowycz, Entropy, extremality, euclidean variations and the equations of motion, JHEP 01 (2018) 081 [arXiv:1705.08453] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhysicsUniversity of CaliforniaSanta BarbaraU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations