Journal of High Energy Physics

, 2014:110 | Cite as

Charge and color breaking constraints in MSSM after the Higgs discovery at LHC

  • Debtosh Chowdhury
  • Rohini M. Godbole
  • Kirtimaan A. Mohan
  • Sudhir K. Vempati
Open Access
Article

Abstract

We revisit the constraints on the parameter space of the Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model (MSSM), from charge and color breaking minima in the light of information on the Higgs from the LHC so far. We study the behavior of the scalar potential keeping two light sfermion fields along with the Higgs in the pMSSM framework and analyze the stability of the vacuum. We find that for lightest stops ≲ 1 TeV and small μ ≲ 500 GeV, the absolute stability of the potential can be attained only for \( \left| {{X_t}} \right|\lesssim \sqrt{{6{m_{{\widetilde{t}1}}}{m_{{\widetilde{t}2}}}}} \). The bounds become stronger for larger values of the μ parameter. Note that this is approximately the value of Xt which maximizes the Higgs mass. Our bounds on the low scale MSSM parameters are more stringent than those reported earlier in literature. We reanalyze the stau sector as well, keeping both staus. We study the connections between the observed Higgs rates and vacuum (meta)stability. We show how a precision study of the ratio of signal strengths, (μ γγ ZZ ) can shed further light.

Keywords

Supersymmetry Phenomenology 

Notes

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

References

  1. [1]
    CMS collaboration, Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 716 (2012) 30 [arXiv:1207.7235] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    ATLAS collaboration, Observation of a new particle in the search for the standard model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 716 (2012) 1 [arXiv:1207.7214] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    CMS collaboration, Combination of standard model higgs boson searches and measurements of the properties of the new boson with a mass near 125 GeV, CMS-PAS-HIG-13-005 (1542387).
  4. [4]
    ATLAS collaboration, Combined coupling measurements of the Higgs-like boson with the ATLAS detector using up to 25 fb −1 of proton-proton collision data, ATLAS-CONF-2013-034 (2013).
  5. [5]
    M. Baak et al., The electroweak fit of the standard model after the discovery of a new boson at the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C 72 (2012) 2205 [arXiv:1209.2716] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    M. Baak et al., Updated status of the global electroweak fit and constraints on new physics, Eur. Phys. J. C 72 (2012) 2003 [arXiv:1107.0975] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    N. Cabibbo, L. Maiani, G. Parisi and R. Petronzio, Bounds on the fermions and Higgs boson masses in grand unified theories, Nucl. Phys. B 158 (1979) 295 [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    J. Ellis, J. Espinosa, G. Giudice, A. Hoecker and A. Riotto, The probable fate of the standard model, Phys. Lett. B 679 (2009) 369 [arXiv:0906.0954] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    J. Elias-Miro et al., Higgs mass implications on the stability of the electroweak vacuum, Phys. Lett. B 709 (2012) 222 [arXiv:1112.3022] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    J. Elias-Miro, J.R. Espinosa, G.F. Giudice, H.M. Lee and A. Strumia, Stabilization of the electroweak vacuum by a scalar threshold effect, JHEP 06 (2012) 031 [arXiv:1203.0237] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    G. Degrassi et al., Higgs mass and vacuum stability in the standard model at NNLO, JHEP 08 (2012) 098 [arXiv:1205.6497] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    M. Zoller, Vacuum stability in the SM and the three-loop β-function for the Higgs self-interaction, arXiv:1209.5609 [INSPIRE].
  13. [13]
    V. Branchina and E. Messina, Stability, Higgs boson mass and new physics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 (2013) 241801 [arXiv:1307.5193] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    G. Isidori, Interpreting theHiggs-mass oracle”, talk given at SUSY 2013, August 26-31, ICTP, Trietse, Italy (2013).Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    J. Frere, D. Jones and S. Raby, Fermion masses and induction of the weak scale by supergravity, Nucl. Phys. B 222 (1983) 11 [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    L. Álvarez-Gaumé, J. Polchinski and M.B. Wise, Minimal low-energy supergravity, Nucl. Phys. B 221 (1983) 495 [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    J. Derendinger and C.A. Savoy, Quantum effects and SU(2) × U(1) breaking in supergravity gauge theories, Nucl. Phys. B 237 (1984) 307 [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    C. Kounnas, A. Lahanas, D.V. Nanopoulos and M. Quirós, Low-energy behavior of realistic locally supersymmetric grand unified theories, Nucl. Phys. B 236 (1984) 438 [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    M. Drees, M. Gluck and K. Grassie, A new class of false vacua in low-energy N = 1 supergravity theories, Phys. Lett. B 157 (1985) 164 [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    J. Gunion, H. Haber and M. Sher, Charge/color breaking minima and a-parameter bounds in supersymmetric models, Nucl. Phys. B 306 (1988) 1 [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    H. Komatsu, New constraints on parameters in the minimal supersymmetric model, Phys. Lett. B 215 (1988) 323 [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    P. Langacker and N. Polonsky, Implications of Yukawa unification for the Higgs sector in supersymmetric grand unified models, Phys. Rev. D 50 (1994) 2199 [hep-ph/9403306] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    J. Casas, A. Lleyda and C. Muñoz, Strong constraints on the parameter space of the MSSM from charge and color breaking minima, Nucl. Phys. B 471 (1996) 3 [hep-ph/9507294] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    A. Kusenko, P. Langacker and G. Segre, Phase transitions and vacuum tunneling into charge and color breaking minima in the MSSM, Phys. Rev. D 54 (1996) 5824 [hep-ph/9602414] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    L.J. Hall, D. Pinner and J.T. Ruderman, A natural SUSY Higgs near 126 GeV, JHEP 04 (2012) 131 [arXiv:1112.2703] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    S. Heinemeyer, O. Stal and G. Weiglein, Interpreting the LHC Higgs search results in the MSSM, Phys. Lett. B 710 (2012) 201 [arXiv:1112.3026] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    D. Albornoz Vasquez, G. Bélanger, R. Godbole and A. Pukhov, The Higgs boson in the MSSM in light of the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 115013 [arXiv:1112.2200] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  28. [28]
    A. Arbey, M. Battaglia and F. Mahmoudi, Constraints on the MSSM from the Higgs sector: a pMSSM study of Higgs searches, \( B_s^0 \)μ + μ and dark matter direct detection, Eur. Phys. J. C 72 (2012) 1906 [arXiv:1112.3032] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. [29]
    A. Arbey, M. Battaglia, A. Djouadi, F. Mahmoudi and J. Quevillon, Implications of a 125 GeV Higgs for supersymmetric models, Phys. Lett. B 708 (2012) 162 [arXiv:1112.3028] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. [30]
    P. Draper, P. Meade, M. Reece and D. Shih, Implications of a 125 GeV Higgs for the MSSM and low-scale SUSY breaking, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 095007 [arXiv:1112.3068] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  31. [31]
    M. Carena, S. Gori, N.R. Shah and C.E. Wagner, A 125 GeV SM-like Higgs in the MSSM and the γγ rate, JHEP 03 (2012) 014 [arXiv:1112.3336] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. [32]
    N.D. Christensen, T. Han and S. Su, MSSM Higgs bosons at The LHC, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 115018 [arXiv:1203.3207] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  33. [33]
    H. Baer, V. Barger and A. Mustafayev, Implications of a 125 GeV Higgs scalar for LHC SUSY and neutralino dark matter searches, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 075010 [arXiv:1112.3017] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  34. [34]
    M. Kadastik, K. Kannike, A. Racioppi and M. Raidal, Implications of the 125 GeV Higgs boson for scalar dark matter and for the CMSSM phenomenology, JHEP 05 (2012) 061 [arXiv:1112.3647] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. [35]
    O. Buchmueller et al., Higgs and supersymmetry, Eur. Phys. J. C 72 (2012) 2020 [arXiv:1112.3564] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. [36]
    L. Aparicio, D. Cerdeno and L. Ibáñez, A 119-125 GeV Higgs from a string derived slice of the CMSSM, JHEP 04 (2012) 126 [arXiv:1202.0822] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. [37]
    J. Ellis and K.A. Olive, Revisiting the Higgs mass and dark matter in the CMSSM, Eur. Phys. J. C 72 (2012) 2005 [arXiv:1202.3262] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. [38]
    H. Baer, V. Barger and A. Mustafayev, Neutralino dark matter in mSUGRA/CMSSM with a 125 GeV light Higgs scalar, JHEP 05 (2012) 091 [arXiv:1202.4038] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. [39]
    A. Arbey, M. Battaglia, A. Djouadi and F. Mahmoudi, The Higgs sector of the phenomenological MSSM in the light of the Higgs boson discovery, JHEP 09 (2012) 107 [arXiv:1207.1348] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. [40]
    J.-J. Cao, Z.-X. Heng, J.M. Yang, Y.-M. Zhang and J.-Y. Zhu, A SM-like Higgs near 125 GeV in low energy SUSY: a comparative study for MSSM and NMSSM, JHEP 03 (2012) 086 [arXiv:1202.5821] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. [41]
    ATLAS collaboration, Combined measurements of the mass and signal strength of the Higgs-like boson with the ATLAS detector using up to 25 fb −1 of proton-proton collision data, ATLAS-CONF-2013-014 (2013).
  42. [42]
    H.E. Haber and R. Hempfling, Can the mass of the lightest Higgs boson of the minimal supersymmetric model be larger than m(Z)?, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66 (1991) 1815 [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. [43]
    J.R. Ellis, G. Ridolfi and F. Zwirner, Radiative corrections to the masses of supersymmetric Higgs bosons, Phys. Lett. B 257 (1991) 83 [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. [44]
    Y. Okada, M. Yamaguchi and T. Yanagida, Upper bound of the lightest Higgs boson mass in the minimal supersymmetric standard model, Prog. Theor. Phys. 85 (1991) 1 [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  45. [45]
    H.E. Haber, R. Hempfling and A.H. Hoang, Approximating the radiatively corrected Higgs mass in the minimal supersymmetric model, Z. Phys. C 75 (1997) 539 [hep-ph/9609331] [INSPIRE].Google Scholar
  46. [46]
    J.M. Cline, G.D. Moore and G. Servant, Was the electroweak phase transition preceded by a color broken phase?, Phys. Rev. D 60 (1999) 105035 [hep-ph/9902220] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  47. [47]
    D. Chowdhury, R. Garani and S.K. Vempati, SUSEFLAV: program for supersymmetric mass spectra with seesaw mechanism and rare lepton flavor violating decays, Comput. Phys. Commun. 184 (2013) 899 [arXiv:1109.3551] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. [48]
    MSSM Working Group collaboration, A. Djouadi et al., The minimal supersymmetric standard model: group summary report, hep-ph/9901246 [INSPIRE].
  49. [49]
    S.R. Coleman, The fate of the false vacuum. 1. Semiclassical theory, Phys. Rev. D 15 (1977) 2929 [Erratum ibid. D 16 (1977) 1248] [INSPIRE].
  50. [50]
    C.G. Callan Jr. and S.R. Coleman, The fate of the false vacuum. 2. First quantum corrections, Phys. Rev. D 16 (1977) 1762 [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  51. [51]
    M. Claudson, L.J. Hall and I. Hinchliffe, Low-energy supergravity: false vacua and vacuous predictions, Nucl. Phys. B 228 (1983) 501 [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. [52]
    L. Pearce, A. Kusenko and R. Peccei, Phenomenology of supersymmetric models with a symmetry-breaking seesaw mechanism, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 075011 [arXiv:1307.6157] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  53. [53]
    A. Djouadi, The Anatomy of electro-weak symmetry breaking. II. The Higgs bosons in the minimal supersymmetric model, Phys. Rept. 459 (2008) 1 [hep-ph/0503173] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. [54]
    Heavy Flavor Averaging Group collaboration, Y. Amhis et al., Averages of B-hadron, C-hadron and τ-lepton properties as of early 2012, arXiv:1207.1158 [INSPIRE].
  55. [55]
    LHCb collaboration, Measurement of the \( B_s^0 \)μ + μ branching fraction and search for B 0μ + μ decays at the LHCb experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 (2013) 101805 [arXiv:1307.5024] [INSPIRE].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. [56]
    CMS collaboration, Measurement of the \( B_s^0 \)μ + μ branching fraction and search for B 0μ + μ with the CMS experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 (2013) 101804 [arXiv:1307.5025] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. [57]
    G. Bélanger, F. Boudjema, A. Pukhov and A. Semenov, MicrOMEGAs3.1: a program for calculating dark matter observables, arXiv:1305.0237 [INSPIRE].
  58. [58]
    C.L. Wainwright, CosmoTransitions: computing cosmological phase transition temperatures and bubble profiles with multiple fields, Comput. Phys. Commun. 183 (2012) 2006 [arXiv:1109.4189] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. [59]
    G. Gamberini, G. Ridolfi and F. Zwirner, On radiative gauge symmetry breaking in the minimal supersymmetric model, Nucl. Phys. B 331 (1990) 331 [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. [60]
    D. Chowdhury, K.A. Mohan, R.M. Godbole and S.K. Vempati, Renormalization scale dependence of CCB in MSSM: complete one-loop study, in preparation.Google Scholar
  61. [61]
    ATLAS collaboration, Measurements of Higgs boson production and couplings in diboson final states with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 726 (2013) 88 [arXiv:1307.1427] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  62. [62]
    M. Carena, S. Gori, N.R. Shah, C.E. Wagner and L.-T. Wang, Light stau phenomenology and the Higgs γγ rate, JHEP 07 (2012) 175 [arXiv:1205.5842] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. [63]
    M. Carena, I. Low and C.E. Wagner, Implications of a modified Higgs to diphoton decay width, JHEP 08 (2012) 060 [arXiv:1206.1082] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. [64]
    T. Kitahara, Vacuum stability constraints on the enhancement of the hγγ rate in the MSSM, JHEP 11 (2012) 021 [arXiv:1208.4792] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. [65]
    M. Carena, S. Gori, I. Low, N.R. Shah and C.E. Wagner, Vacuum stability and Higgs diphoton decays in the MSSM, JHEP 02 (2013) 114 [arXiv:1211.6136] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. [66]
    M. Carena, S. Gori, N.R. Shah, C.E. Wagner and L.-T. Wang, Light stops, light staus and the 125 GeV Higgs, JHEP 08 (2013) 087 [arXiv:1303.4414] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. [67]
    T. Kitahara and T. Yoshinaga, Stau with large mass difference and enhancement of the Higgs to diphoton decay rate in the MSSM, JHEP 05 (2013) 035 [arXiv:1303.0461] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. [68]
    M.S. Carena, M. Olechowski, S. Pokorski and C. Wagner, Electroweak symmetry breaking and bottom-top Yukawa unification, Nucl. Phys. B 426 (1994) 269 [hep-ph/9402253] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. [69]
    A. Djouadi, Precision Higgs coupling measurements at the LHC through ratios of production cross sections, Eur. Phys. J. C 73 (2013) 2498 [arXiv:1208.3436] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. [70]
    A. Djouadi, J. Kalinowski and M. Spira, HDECAY: a program for Higgs boson decays in the standard model and its supersymmetric extension, Comput. Phys. Commun. 108 (1998) 56 [hep-ph/9704448] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  71. [71]
    J. Camargo-Molina, B. O’Leary, W. Porod and F. Staub, Stability of the CMSSM against sfermion VEVs, JHEP 12 (2013) 103 [arXiv:1309.7212] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. [72]
    N. Blinov and D.E. Morrissey, Charge and color breaking constraints in the minimal supersymmetric standard model, arXiv:1309.7397 [INSPIRE].

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Debtosh Chowdhury
    • 1
  • Rohini M. Godbole
    • 1
  • Kirtimaan A. Mohan
    • 1
  • Sudhir K. Vempati
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for High Energy Physics, Indian Institute of ScienceBangaloreIndia

Personalised recommendations