Abstract
Timelike Liouville theory admits the sphere \({{\mathbb{S}}^2}\) as a real saddle point, about which quantum fluctuations can occur. An issue occurs when computing the expectation values of specific types of quantities, like the distance between points. The problem being that the gauge redundancy of the path integral over metrics is not completely fixed even after fixing to conformal gauge by imposing \({g_{{\mu \nu }}}={e^{{2\widehat{b}\phi }}}{{\widetilde{g}}_{{\mu \nu }}}\), where ϕ is the Liouville field and \({{\widetilde{g}}_{{\mu \nu }}}\) is a reference metric. The physical metric \({g_{{\mu \nu }}}\), and therefore the path integral over metrics still possesses a gauge redundancy due to invariance under SL 2(\(\mathbb{C}\)) coordinate transformations of the reference coordinates. This zero mode of the action must be dealt with before a perturbative analysis can be made.
This paper shows that after fixing to conformal gauge, the remaining zero mode of the linearized Liouville action due to SL 2(\(\mathbb{C}\)) coordinate transformations can be dealt with by using standard Fadeev-Popov methods. Employing the gauge condition that the “dipole” of the reference coordinate system is a fixed vector, and then integrating over all values of this dipole vector. The “dipole” vector referring to how coordinate area is concentrated about the sphere; assuming the sphere is embedded in \({{\mathbb{R}}^3}\) and centered at the origin, and the coordinate area is thought of as a charge density on the sphere. The vector points along the ray from the origin of \({{\mathbb{R}}^3}\) to the direction of greatest coordinate area.
A Green’s function is obtained and used to compute the expectation value of the geodesic length between two points on the \({{\mathbb{S}}^2}\) to second order in the Timelike Liouville coupling \(\widehat{b}\). This quantity doesn’t suffer from any power law or logarithmic divergences as a na¨ıve power counting argument might suggest.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
A.M. Polyakov, Quantum geometry of bosonic strings, Phys. Lett. B 103 (1981) 207 [INSPIRE].
B. Freivogel, Y. Sekino, L. Susskind and C.-P. Yeh, A holographic framework for eternal inflation, Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 086003 [hep-th/0606204] [INSPIRE].
L. Susskind, The census taker’s hat, arXiv:0710.1129 [INSPIRE].
Y. Sekino and L. Susskind, Census taking in the hat: FRW/CFT duality, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 083531 [arXiv:0908.3844] [INSPIRE].
D. Harlow and L. Susskind, Crunches, hats and a conjecture, arXiv:1012.5302 [INSPIRE].
L.F. Alday, D. Gaiotto and Y. Tachikawa, Liouville Correlation Functions from Four-dimensional Gauge Theories, Lett. Math. Phys. 91 (2010) 167 [arXiv:0906.3219] [INSPIRE].
H. Dorn and H. Otto, Two and three point functions in Liouville theory, Nucl. Phys. B 429 (1994) 375 [hep-th/9403141] [INSPIRE].
J. Ambjørn and Y. Watabiki, Scaling in quantum gravity, Nucl. Phys. B 445 (1995) 129 [hep-th/9501049] [INSPIRE].
J. Ambjørn, J. Barkley and T. Budd, Roaming moduli space using dynamical triangulations, Nucl. Phys. B 858 (2012) 267 [arXiv:1110.4649] [INSPIRE].
J. Ambjørn and T.G. Budd, Semi-classical dynamical triangulations, Phys. Lett. B 718 (2012) 200 [arXiv:1209.6031] [INSPIRE].
E. D’Hoker, D.Z. Freedman and R. Jackiw, SO(2, 1) invariant quantization of the Liouville theory, Phys. Rev. D 28 (1983) 2583 [INSPIRE].
E. D’Hoker and R. Jackiw, Space translation breaking and compactification in the Liouville theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 50 (1983) 1719 [INSPIRE].
D. Harlow, J. Maltz and E. Witten, Analytic continuation of Liouville theory, JHEP 12 (2011) 071 [arXiv:1108.4417] [INSPIRE].
A.B. Zamolodchikov, Three-point function in the minimal Liouville gravity, Theor. Math. Phys. 142 (2005) 183 [INSPIRE].
P.H. Ginsparg and G.W. Moore, Lectures on 2D gravity and 2D string theory, hep-th/9304011 [INSPIRE].
Y. Nakayama, Liouville field theory: a decade after the revolution, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 19 (2004) 2771 [hep-th/0402009] [INSPIRE].
J. Teschner, Liouville theory revisited, Class. Quant. Grav. 18 (2001) R153 [hep-th/0104158] [INSPIRE].
E. D’Hoker and R. Jackiw, Classical and quantal Liouville field theory, Phys. Rev. D 26 (1982) 3517 [INSPIRE].
A.B. Zamolodchikov and A.B. Zamolodchikov, Structure constants and conformal bootstrap in Liouville field theory, Nucl. Phys. B 477 (1996) 577 [hep-th/9506136] [INSPIRE].
N. Seiberg, Notes on quantum Liouville theory and quantum gravity, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 102 (1990) 319 [INSPIRE].
F. David, Conformal field theories coupled to 2D gravity in the conformal gauge, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 3 (1988) 1651 [INSPIRE].
A.B. Zamolodchikov, On the three-point function in minimal Liouville gravity, hep-th/0505063 [INSPIRE].
E. Witten, Analytic continuation of Chern-Simons theory, arXiv:1001.2933 [INSPIRE].
C.M. Bender and S.A. Orszag, Advanced mathematical methods for scientists and engineers, Springer, U.S.A. (1978).
L. Faddeev and V. Popov, Feynman diagrams for the yang-mills field, Phys. Lett. B 25 (1967) 29 [INSPIRE].
L. Faddeev, Feynman integral for singular Lagrangians, Theor. Math. Phys. 1 (1969) 1 [INSPIRE].
G.C. Wick, The evaluation of the collision matrix, Phys. Rev. 80 (1950) 268 [INSPIRE].
V.N. Gribov, Quantization of non-Abelian gauge theories, Nucl. Phys. B 139 (1978) 1 [INSPIRE].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
ArXiv ePrint: 1210.2398
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Maltz, J. Gauge invariant computable quantities in timelike Liouville theory. J. High Energ. Phys. 2013, 151 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP01(2013)151
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP01(2013)151