Antimatter. Past, present and future

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. [1]

    Dirac P. A. M., The Quantum Theory of the Electron, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A, 117 (1928) 610; The Quantum Theory of the Electron, Part II, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A, 118 (1928) 351.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. [2]

    Weyl H., Gruppentheorie und Quantenmechanik, 2nd edition, (1931) p. 234.

    Google Scholar 

  3. [3]

    Wigner E. P., Unitary Representations of the Inhomogeneous Lorentz Group, Ann. Math., 40 (1939) 149.

    Google Scholar 

  4. [4]

    Wick G. C, Wigner E. P. and Wightman A. S., Intrinsic Parity of Elementary Particles, Phys. Rev., 88 (1952) 101.

    Google Scholar 

  5. [5]

    Wigner E. P., Uber die Operation der Zeitumkehr in der Quanten-mechanik, Gött. Nach. (1931) pp. 546–559. Here for the first time an anti-unitary symmetry appears.

    Google Scholar 

  6. [6]

    Wigner E. P., Ann. Math., 40 (1939) 149.

    ADS  MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. [7]

    Schwinger J., Phys. Rev., 82 (1951) 914.

    ADS  MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. [8]

    Bell J. S., Time Reversal in Field Theory, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A, 231 (1955) 479.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. [9]

    To the best of my knowledge, the CPT theorem was first proved by W. Pauli in his article Exclusion Principle, Lorentz Group and Reflection of Space- Time and Charge, in Niels Bohr and the Development of Physics (Pergamon Press, London) 1955, p. 30)

    Google Scholar 

  10. [9a]

    which in turn is an extension of the work of J. Schwinger (Phys. Rev., 82 (1951) 914; The Theory of Quantized Fields. II., Phys. Rev., 91 (1953) 713; The Theory of Quantized Fields. III., Phys. Rev., 91 (1953) 728; The Theory of Quantized Fields. VI., Phys. Rev., 94 (1954) 1362) and

    ADS  MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. [9a]

    G. Lüjders, On the Equivalence of Invariance under Time Reversal and under Particle-Anti-particle Conjugation for Relativistic Field Theories (Dansk. Mat. Fys. Medd., 28 (1954) 5), which referred to an unpublished remark by B. Zumino.

    Google Scholar 

  12. [9a]

    The final contribution to the CPT theorem was given by R. Jost, in Fine Bemerkung zum CPT Theorem (Helv. Phys. Acta, 30 (1957) 409), who showed that a weaker condition, called “weak local commutativity” was sufficient for the validity of the CPT theorem.

    Google Scholar 

  13. [10]

    Anselmo F., Cifarelli L., Petermann A. and Zichichi A., The Simultaneous Evolution of Masses and Couplings: Consequences on Supersymmetry Spectra and Thresholds, Nuovo Cimento A, 105 (1992) 1179

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. [10a]

    see also Zichichi A., in Subnuclear Physics - The first fifty years, edited by O. Barnabei, P. Pupillo and F. Roversi Monaco, (University and Academy of Sciences of Bologna, joint publication) 1998; World Scientific Series in 20th Century Physics, Vol. 24 (2000). See also refs. [33–35].

  15. [11]

    Lee T. D., Are Matter and Antimatter Symmetric? in Proceedings of the Symposium to celebrate the 30th anniversary of the Discovery of Nuclear Antimatter, edited by L. Maiani and R. A. Ricci, SIF Conf. Proc., Vol. 53 (Editrice Compositori, Bologna) 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  16. [12]

    Anderson C. D., The Positive Electron, Phys. Rev., 43 (1933) 491

    Google Scholar 

  17. [12a]

    Blackett P. M. S. and Occhialini G. P. S., Some Photographs of the Tracks of Penetrating Radiation, Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. A, 139 (1933) 699.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. [13]

    Chamberlain O., E. Segrè, Wiegand C. and Ypsilantis T., Observation of Antiprotons, Phys. Rev., 100 (1955) 947.

    Google Scholar 

  19. [14]

    Cork B., Lambertson G. R., Piccioni O., Wenzel W. A., Anti-Neutrons Produced from Anti-Protons in Charge Exchange Collisions, Phys. Rev., 104 (1957) 1193.

    Google Scholar 

  20. [15]

    Lande K., Booth E. T., Impeduglia J., Lederman L. M. and Chinowski W., Observation of Long-Lived Neutral V Particles, Phys. Rev., 103 (1956) 1901.

    Google Scholar 

  21. [16]

    Dirac P. A. M., Theory of Electrons and Positrons, Nobel Lecture, December 12, 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  22. [17]

    Dalitz R. H., On the Analysis of T-Meson data and the Nature of the τ-Meson, Philos. Mag., 44 (1953) 1068

    Google Scholar 

  23. [17a]

    Dalitz R. H., Isotopic Spin Changes in τ and θ Decay, in Proc. Phys. Soc. A, 69 (1956) 527

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. [17b]

    Dalitz R. H., Present Status of T Spin-Parity, in Proceedings of the Sixth Annual Rochester Conference on High Energy Nuclear Physics (Interscience Publishers, Inc., New York) 1956, p. 19

    Google Scholar 

  25. [17c]

    for a detailed record of the events which led to the (θ-τ) puzzle see Dalitz R. H., Kaon Decays to Pions: the τ-θ Problem in History of Original Ideas and Basic Discoveries in Particle Physics, edited by H. B. Newman and T. Ypsilantis (Plenum Press, New York, London) 1994, p. 163.

    Google Scholar 

  26. [18]

    Lee T. D. and Yang C. N., Question of Parity Conservation in Weak Interactions, Phys. Rev., 104 (1956) 254.

    Google Scholar 

  27. [19]

    Wu C. S., Ambler E., Hayward R. W., Hoppes D. D., Experimental Test of Parity Conservation in Beta Decay, Phys. Rev., 105 (1957) 1413

    Google Scholar 

  28. [19a]

    Garwin R., Lederman L. and Weinrich M., Observation of the Failure of Conservation of Parity and Charge Conjugation in Meson Decays: The Magnetic Moment of the Free Muon, Phys. Rev., 105 (1957) 1415

    Google Scholar 

  29. [19b]

    Friedman J. J. and Telegdi V. L., Nuclear Emulsion Evidence for Parity Non-Conservation in the Decay Chain π+ µ+,e+, Phys. Rev., 105 (1957) 1681.

    Google Scholar 

  30. [20]

    Landau L. D., On the Conservation Laws for Weak Interactions, Zh. Éksp. Teor. Fiz., 32 (1957) 405.

    Google Scholar 

  31. [21]

    Christenson J., Cronin J. W., Fitch V. L. and Turlay R., Evidence for the 2π Decay of the K02 Meson, Phys. Rev. Lett, 113 (1964) 138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. [22]

    Lee T. D., Oehme R. and Yang C. N., Remarks on Possible Noninvariance under Time Reversal and Charge Conjugation, Phys. Rev., 106 (1957) 340.

    Google Scholar 

  33. [23]

    Conversi M., Massam T., Th. Muller and Zichichi A., Search for the Time-Like Structure of the Proton, Phys. Lett., 5 (1963) 195.

    Google Scholar 

  34. [24]

    Conversi M., Massam T., Th. Muller and Zichichi A., The Leptonic Annihilation Modes of the Proton-Antiproton System at 6.8 (GeV/c)2 Timelike Four-Momentum Transfer, Nuovo Cimento, 40 (1965) 690.

    Google Scholar 

  35. [25]

    Wu C. S., Lee T. D., Cabibbo N., Weisskopf V. F., Ting S. C. C., Villi C., Conversi M., Petermann A., Wiik B. H. and Wolf G., The Origin of the Third Family, edited by O. Barnabei, L. Maiani, R. A. Ricci and F. Roversi Monaco (Academy of Sciences, Bologna University, INFN, SIF, Rome) 1997; and World Scientific Series in 20th Century Physics, Vol. 20 (1998).

  36. [26]

    Maiani L. and Ricci R. A., (Editors), The Discovery of Nuclear Antimatter, SIF Conf. Proc. Vol. 53 (Editrice Compositori, Bologna) 1995

  37. [26a]

    see also Zichichi A., in Subnuclear Physics - The first fifty years, edited by O. Barnabei, P. Pupillo and F. Roversi Monaco (University and Academy of Sciences of Bologna, joint publication) 1998; World Scientific Series in 20th Century Physics, Vol. 24 (2000).

  38. [27]

    The first report on “scaling” was presented by J. I. Friedman at the 14th International Conference on High Energy Physics in Vienna, 28 August-5 September 1968. The report was presented as paper no. 563 but not published in the Conference Proceedings. It was published as a SLAC preprint. The SLAC data on scaling were included in the Panofsky general report to the Conference where he says “... the apparent success of the parametrization of the cross-sections in the variable v/q2 in addition to the large cross-section itself is at least indicative that point-like interactions are becoming involved”.

  39. [27a]

    Panofsky W. K. H., Low q2Electrodynamics, Elastic and Inelastic Electron (and Muon) Scattering, in Proceedings of 14th International Conference on High Energy Physics in Vienna 1968, edited by J. Prentki and J. Steinberger, published by CERN, 1968, p. 23. The following physicists participated in the inelastic electron scattering experiments

    Google Scholar 

  40. [27b]

    W. B. Atwood, E. Bloom, A. Bodek, M. Breidenbach, G. Buschhorn, R. Cottrell, D. Coward, H. DeStaebler, R. Ditzler, J. Drees, J. Elias, G. Hartmann, C. Jordan, M. Mestayer, G. Miller, L. Mo, H. Piel, J. Poucher, C. Prescott, M. Riordan, L. Rochester, D. Sherden, M. Sogard, S. Stein, D. Trines, and R. Verdier. For additional acknowledgements see Friedman J. I., Kendall H. W. and Taylor R. E., Deep Inelastic Scattering: Acknowledgements, Les Prix Nobel 1990, (Almqvist and Wiksell, Stockholm/Uppsala) 1991, also Rev. Mod. Phys., 63 (1991) 629. For a detailed reconstruction of the events see

    Google Scholar 

  41. [27b]

    Friedman J. I., Deep Inelastic Scattering Evidence for the Reality of Quarks, in History of Original Ideas and Basic Discoveries in Particle Physics, edited by H. B. Newman and T. Ypsilantis (Plenum Press, New York and London) 1994, p. 725.

    Google Scholar 

  42. [28]

    Massam T. and Zichichi A., Quark Search at the ISR, CERN preprint, June 1968

    Google Scholar 

  43. [28a]

    Basile M., Cara Romeo G., Cifarelli L., Giusti P., Massam T., Palmonari F., Valenti G. and Zichichi A., Search for Fractionally Charged Particles Produced in Proton-Proton Collisions at the Highest ISR Energy, Nuovo Cimento A, 40 (1977) 41;and

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  44. [28b]

    Basile M., Cara Romeo G., Cifarelli L., Contin A., D’Alì G., Giusti P., Massam T., Palmonari F., Sartorelli G., Valenti G. and Zichichi A., A Search for quarks in the CERN SPS Neutrino Beam, Nuovo Cimento A, 45 (1978) 281.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  45. [29]

    Massam T., Th. Muller, Righini B., Schneegans M. and Zichichi A., Experimental Observation of Antideuteron Production, Nuovo Cimento, 39 (1965) 10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. [30]

    Zichichi A., in Subnuclear Physics - The first fifty years, edited by O. Barnabei, P. Pupillo and F. Roversi Monaco (University and Academy of Sciences of Bologna, joint publication) 1998; World Scientific Series in 20th Century Physics, Vol. 24 (2000).

  47. [31]

    Zichichi A., New Developments in Elementary Particle Physics, Riv. Nuovo Cimento, 2, n. 14 (1979). The statement on page 2 of this paper, “ Unification of all forces needs first a Super symmetry. This can be broken later, thus generating the sequence of the various forces of nature as we observe them”, was based on a work by A. Petermann and A. Zichichi, in which the renormalization group running of the couplings using supersymmetry was studied with the result that the convergence of the three couplings improved. This work was not published, but perhaps known to a few. The statement quoted is the first instance in which it was pointed out that supersymmetry might play an important role in the convergence of the gauge couplings. In fact, the convergence of three straight lines (α-11 α-12 α-13 ) with a change in slope is guaranteed by the Euclidean geometry, as long as the point where the slope changes is tuned appropriately. What is incorrect about the convergence of the couplings is that, with the initial conditions given by the LEP results, the change in slope needs to be at MSusy ~ 1 TeV as claimed by some authors not aware in 1991 of what was known in 1979 to A. Petermann and A. Zichichi.

    Google Scholar 

  48. [32]

    Gribov V. N., ’T Hooft G., Veneziano G. and Weisskopf V. F., The Creation of Quantum ChromoDynamics and the Effective Energy, edited by L. N. Lipatov (University and the Academy of Sciences of Bologna, INFN -SIF joint publication) 1998; World Scientific Series in 20th Century Physics, Vol. 25 (2000).

  49. [33]

    Anselmo F., Cifarelli L., Petermann A. and Zichichi A., The Effective Experimental Constraints on Msusy and Mgut, Nuovo Cimento A, 104 (1991) 1817.

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. [34]

    Anselmo F., Cifarelli L., Petermann A. and Zichichi A., The Simultaneous Evolution of Masses and Couplings: Consequences on Supersymmetry Spectra and Thresholds, Nuovo Cimento A, 105 (1992) 1179.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  51. [35]

    Anselmo F., Cifarelli L. and Zichichi A., A Study of the Various Approaches to Mgut and αgut, Nuovo Cimento A, 105 (1992) 1335.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  52. [36]

    Greene B., String Theory: the Basic Ideas, Erice Lectures - Discussion 1999 in Basics and Highlights in Fundamental Physics, Vol. 37, edited by A. Zichichi (World Scientific, Singapore) to be published.

  53. [37]

    No matter what the physics processes are, if their mathematical formulation can be expressed in terms of a relativistic, local, quantized, field theory (RQFT), these processes have to obey CPT invariance. Thus to violate this fundamental invariance of nature corresponds to break the basic conceptual structure of a RQFT. It took many decades to discover CPT invariance, as discussed in ref. [9]. And many other decades were needed to discover the convergence of the gauge forces at the Planck scale.

  54. [38]

    Caso C. et al., Particle Data Group, Eur. Phys. J. C, 3 (1998) 1.

    Google Scholar 

  55. [39]

    ’T Hooft G., The Physics of Instantons in the pseudoscalar and vector meson mixing, Hep-th/9903183, to be published in the volume Quark flavour mixing in meson physics; and private communication.

  56. [40]

    Gabrielse G., Khabbaz A., Hall D. S., Heimann C., Kalinowsky H. and Jhe W., Precision Mass Spectroscopy of the Antiproton and Proton Using Simultaneously Trapped Particles, Phys. Rev. Lett., 82 (1999) 3198.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  57. [41]

    As discussed in sect. 3, the nuclear forces mimic the existence of nuclear charges. If despite the non-existence of “nuclear charges”, CPT invariance holds, the mass associated with the opposite nuclear charges is the same as the one associated with the original nuclear charges. Thus an antinucleus must have the same mass as the nucleus. And this means that the nuclear “binding” masses obey CPT invariance. The mass of the deuteron has in its value all transition processes needed for the QCD colour-full world of quarks and gluons to become the world made of mesons and baryons. The equality of the “binding” masses in nuclei and antinuclei is the proof that CPT invariance holds in all these processes.

  58. [42]

    ’T Hooft G., The Creation of Quantum ChromoDynamics, in V. N. Gribov, G. ’T Hooft, G. Veneziano and V. F. Weisskopf, The Creation of Quantum ChromoDynamics and the Effective Energy edited by N. L. Lipatov (Academy of Sciences and University of Bologna, INFN -SIF joint publication) 1998, p. 25; World Scientific Series in 20th Century Physics, Vol. 25 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  59. [42a]

    Lee T. D., Rev. Mod. Phys., 47 (1975) 267

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. [42b]

    Lee T. D., Nucl. Phys. A, 553 (1993) 3c; and

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. [42c]

    A. Zichichi, INFN - Report on the ALICE project for LHC to the INFN -Comm. III, Rome, Italy, May 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  62. [43]

    Sakharov A., JEPT Lett, 5 (1967) 24.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  63. [44]

    Ting S. C. C., The Discovery of Nuclear Antimatter and the Origin of the AMS Experiment, in Proceedings of the Symposium to Celebrate the 30th Anniversary of the Discovery of Nuclear Antimatter, edited by L. Maiani and R. A. Ricci, SIF Conf. Proc, Vol. 53 (Editrice Compositori, Bologna) 1995, p. 21.

    Google Scholar 

  64. [45]

    Rochester G. D. and Butler C. C., Evidence for the Existence of New Unstable Elementary Particles, Nature, 160 (1947) 855.

    Google Scholar 

  65. [46]

    Gell - Mann M. and Pais A., Behavior of Neutral Particles under Charge Conjugation, Phys. Rev., 97 (1955) 1387.

    Google Scholar 

  66. [47]

    Cabibbo N., Unitary Symmetry and Leptonic Decays, Phys. Rev. Lett., 10 (1963) 531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. [48]

    Glashow S. L., Iliopoulos J. and Maiani L., Weak Interactions with Lepton-Hadron Symmetry, Phys. Rev. D, 2 (1970) 1285.

    Google Scholar 

  68. [49]

    Kobayashi M. and Maskawa T., CP-Violation in the Renormalizable Theory of Weak Interaction, Prog. Theor. Phys., 49 (1973) 652.

    Google Scholar 

  69. [50]

    Burkhardt H. et al., First evidence for direct CP violation, Phys. Lett. B, 206 (1988) 169

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  70. [50a]

    this result has been confirmed by the same team in 1993 (Barr G. D. et al., Phys. Lett. B, 317 (1993) 233)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  71. [50b]

    a Fermilab group, however, found a value consistent with Zero (Gibbons L. K. et al, Phys. Lett, 70 (1993) 1203).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. [50c]

    Recently, new experiments at Fermilab (Alavi-Harati A. et al., Phys. Rev. Lett, 83 (1999) 22) and at CERN

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  73. [50d]

    Fanti V. et al., (NA 48 Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. B, 465 (1999) 335 and

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  74. [50e]

    Lai A. et al, (NA 48 Collaboration), Eur. Phys. J. C (2001)) confirm the observation of the NA 31 Collaboration (Burkhardt H. et al. and of Barr G. D. et al, quoted above) at CERN and contradict the early Fermilab result of Gibbons et al..

    Google Scholar 

  75. [51]

    Wolfenstein L., Violation of CP invariance and the possibility of very weak interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett, 13 (1964) 562

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  76. [51a]

    Lee T. D. and Wolfenstein L., Phys. Rev. B, 138 (1965) 1490; see also

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  77. [51b]

    Wolfenstein L., in Theory and Phenomenology in Particle Physics, Proceedings of the 1968 Erice School, Vol. 219, edited by A. Zichichi (Academic Press, New York and London) 1969.

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Zichichi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zichichi, A. Antimatter. Past, present and future. Riv. Nuovo Cim. 24, 1–32 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03548903

Download citation