Advertisement

Canadian Journal of Public Health

, Volume 101, Supplement 1, pp S3–S4 | Cite as

Canadian Occupational Health and Safety Research in Action: Advances and Challenges

  • Susan Stock
  • Aleck Ostry
  • France Labrèche
Editorial
  • 3 Downloads

La recherche canadienne en santé et sécurité du travail en action: progrès et défis

References

  1. 1.
    Association of Workers’ Compensation Boards of Canada (AWCBC). Key Statistical Measures for 2008. February 2010. Available online: https://doi.org/www.awcbc.org/en/keystatisticalmeasuresksmsdatatables.asp (Accessed April 2010).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Shannon HS, Lowe GS. How many injured workers do not file claims for workers’ compensation benefits? Am J Ind Med 2002;42:467–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Smith PM, Kosny AA, Mustard CA. Differences in access to wage replacement benefits for absences due to work-related injury or illness in Canada. Am J Ind Med 2009;52:341–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rosenman KD, Gardiner JC, Wang J, Biddle J, Hogan A, Reilly MJ, et al. Why most workers with occupational repetitive trauma do not file for workers’ compensation. J Occup Environ Med 2000;42(1):25–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kraut A. Estimates of the extent of morbidity and mortality due to occupational diseases in Canada. Am J Ind Med 1994;25:267–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kraut A. Hospitalization in Winnipeg, Canada due to occupational disease: A pilot study. Am J Ind Med 2009;52:372–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Marmot M, Friel S, Bell R, Houweling TAJ, Taylor S. Closing the gap in a generation: Health equity through action on the social determinants of health. Lancet 2008;372:1661–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lundberg I, Hemmingsson T, Hogstedt C (Eds.). Work and Social Inequalities in Health in Europe. Brussels: Peter Lang Publishing Group, 2007.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bauer GF, Huber CA, Jenny GJ, Müller F, Hämmig O. Socioeconomic status, working conditions and self-rated health in Switzerland: Explaining the gradient in men and women. Int J Public Health 2009;54;23–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mehlum IS, Kristensen P, Kjuus H, Wergeland E. Are occupational factors important determinants of socioeconomic inequalities in musculoskeletal pain? Scand J Work Environ Health 2008;34(4):250–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Claugherty JE, Souza K, Cullen MR. Work and its role in shaping the social gradient in health. Annals NY Acad Sci 2010;1186:102–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Plouvier S, Leclerc A, Chastang J-F, Bonenfant S, Goldberg M. Socioeconom-ic position and low-back pain–the role of biomechanical strains and psychosocial work factors in the GAZEL cohort. Scand J Work Environ Health 2009;35(6):429–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Messing K, Stock S, Tissot F. Should studies of risk factors for MSDs be stratified by gender? Lessons from analyses of musculoskeletal disorders among respondents to the 1998 Québec Health Survey. Scand J Work Environ Health 2009;35(2):96–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Messing K, Punnett L, Bond M, Alexanderson K, Pyle J, Zahm S, et al. Be the fairest of them all: Challenges and recommendations for the treatment of gender in occupational health research. Am J Ind Med 2003;43(6):618–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Canadian Public Health Association 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Susan Stock
    • 1
    • 4
  • Aleck Ostry
    • 2
  • France Labrèche
    • 3
    • 5
  1. 1.Institut national de santé publique du QuébecCanada
  2. 2.Department of GeographyUniversity of VictoriaVictoriaCanada
  3. 3.Institut de recherche Robert-Sauvé en santé et en sécurité du travailCanada
  4. 4.Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, School of Public HealthUniversité de MontréalCanada
  5. 5.Departments of Social and Preventive Medicine and of Environmental and Occupational Health, School of Public HealthUniversité de MontréalMontréalCanadaCanada

Personalised recommendations