Journal of Hydrodynamics

, Volume 18, Issue 1, pp 232–239 | Cite as

Flow and sediment simulation around spur dike with free surface using 3-D turbulent model

Session A4

Abstract

Treatments of irregular boundary, bed deformation and free surface are main problems in 3-D flow and sediment model. Based on control equations of turbulent flow considering irregular boundary from liquid-solid two phase flow theory, the k - ε model and the Wall Function are adopted to develop a new model. In the model, apart from k - ε model and the Wall Function, the VOF method and the porosity concept are adopted to simulate water surface, irregular boundary and bed deformation. Using the new model, flow field, changing of water level, turbulent kinetic energy and its dissipation rate, and local scour-deposition around spur dike are simulated. Computed result is compared with experimental data. The model developed can successfully simulate the separating structure of flow and circumfluence around the spur dike, secondary flow in the circumfluence area, scour hole profile and bed contours and agree well with the experimental data.

Key words

3-D turbulent model spur dike sediment transport VOF method the porosity wall function 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Klingeman, P.C., Kehe, S.M., and Owusu, Y.A., Streambank erosion and channel scour manipulation using rockfill dikes and gabions[C], WRRI Report for Project No. 373909, Oregon State Univ., Corvallis, Oregon, 1984, 84–179.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Chen N.S. and Li C.H., Numerical solution of the flow around a spur dike with kε turbulent model [J], J. of NanJing Hydraulic Research Institute, 1989(3):11–23Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Tingsanchali, A. and Maheswaran, 2-D Depth-average flow computation near groyne [J], J.Hydraulic Engineering, ASCE, 1990, 116: p71–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Molls, T., Chaudhry, M.H. and Khan, K.W., Numerical simulation of two-dimensional flow near a spur dike [J], Advance in Water Resources, 1995, Vol. 118, No. 4, 227–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Mayerle, R., Toro, F.M. and Wang, S.S.Y., Verification of a three-dimensional numerical model simulation of the flow in the vicinity of spur dikes[J], J. Hydr. Res., Delft, Netherlands, 1995, 33(2), 243–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Zhou Yilin, Michiue Masanori and Hinokidani Osamu, Study on flow characteristics around the non-submerged spur-dike [J], J. of Hydraulic eng (in Chinese), 2004(8):46-53Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Zhou Yilin, Large-eddy simulation of 3-D flow motion around submerged spur-dike [J], J. of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2001, 18(5):28–36.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Peng Jing, Flow and local scour around spur-dike [M], The Yellow River Press Publications, Zheng Zhou, China, 2004 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    PFNG Jing, Nobuvuki Tamai and Yoshihisa Kawahara, Numerical modeling of local scour around spur dikes [J], J. of Sediment Research, 2002(1):25–29Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Jia, Y., and Wang, S.S.Y., A modeling approach to predict local scour around spur dike-like structures [C], Proc., 6th Federal Interagency Sediment Conf., Las Vegas, 1996, Nev., II. 90–97Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Jia, Y., and Wang, S. S.Y., Numerical model for channel flow and morphological change studies [J], J. Hydraulic Eng., 125(9):924-933CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Michiue, M., and Hinokidani, O., Calculation of 2-dimensional bed evolution around spur-dike [J], Ann. J. Hydraulic Eng., 1992, 36, 61–66 (in Japanese).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Speziale, C.G. and Thangma, S., Analysis of a RNG based turbulence model for separated flows[C], NASA, CR-189600, ICASE, Rept. 1992, No. 92–3.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    Rijn, L.C., Sediment transport, Part I: Bed load transport [J], J. of hydraulic engineering, ASCE, 1984, Vol. 110, No. 10, October, p1431–1456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    S. Abdel-Fattah, A. Amin and L. C. Van Rijn, Sand transport in Nile River, Egypt [J], J. of Hydraulic Eng., ASCE, Vol. 130, Vol. 6, June, 2004:488–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    van Rijn, L.C., Principles of sediment transport in rivers [M], Estuaries and coastal seas, AQUA Publications, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1993.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    Rodi W., Turbulence models and their application in hydraulic — a state of the art view [C], 2nd Ed., IAHR, Delft, The Netherlands, 1980.Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    Rodi W., Turbulence models and their application in hydraulic — a state of the art view [C]. Federal Republic of Germany: University of Karlsruhe, 1984Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    Launder, B.E. and Spalding, D.B., The numerical computation of turbulent flows [J], Comp. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 1974, vol. 3, 269–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    Hirt C. W., Nichols B. D., Volume of fluid (VOF) method for the dynamics of free boundary [J], Compute Phys, 1981, 39:201–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    Tominaga, A. and Chiba, S., Flow structure around a submerged spur dike[C], Proc. of Annual Meeting of Japan Society of Fluid Mechanics, 1996, p317–318, in JapaneseGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    Muneta, N., and Shimizu, Y., Numerical analysis model with spur-dike considering the vertical flow velocity distribution [J], Proc., JSCE, 1994, 497, 31–39, in JapaneseGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    Ohmoto, T., Hirakawa, R. and Ide, K., Responses of secondary currents and sediments to submerged groynes [J], Annual J. of Hydraulic Eng., JSCE, 1998, Vol. 42:1003–1008CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© China Ship Scientific Research Center 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering ScienceWuhan UniversityWuhanChina

Personalised recommendations