Advertisement

The Psychological Record

, Volume 42, Issue 4, pp 565–573 | Cite as

Approaches of Acomys cahirinus to Conspecifics of Varying Consanguinity

  • Alexander J. Skolnick
  • Marjorie Goldman
  • Ethel Tobach
Article
  • 1 Downloads

Abstract

To obtain spiny mice (Acomys cahirinus) for study, one male sired litters with two females in the same enclosure. During postpartum estrus, a second litter was obtained, permitting a comparison of the offspring of the same sire and different females with the offspring of the same sire and female. Eighteen spiny mice were presented with familiar and unfamiliar conspecifics of various kinship. Latency of approach and time spent with the presented animal were recorded. Generally, most of the differences in the responses were not significant. However, there was a tendency for responses to be quicker to unfamiliar/unrelated conspecifics.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. BIRKE, L. I. A., & SADLER, D. (1987). Effects of odor familiarity on the development of systematic exploration in the spiny mouse, Acomys cahirinus. Developmental Psychobiology, 20, 627–640.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. GOLDMAN, M., SKOLNICK, A., HERNANDEZ, T., & TOBACH, E. (1991). Distance perception in the spiny mouse (Acomys cahirinus): Vertical jumping. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  3. GRAFEN, A. (1990). Do animals really recognize kin? Animal Behaviour, 39, 42–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. JANUS, C. (1988). The development of responses to naturally occurring odours in spiny mice Acomys cahirinus. Animal Behaviour, 36, 1400–1406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. JANUS, C., & HOLMAN, S. D. (1989). Development of sex differences in the responses of spiny mouse pups to adult male odors. Physiology & Behavior, 46, 895–899.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. MATOCHIK, J. A. (1988). Role of the main olfactory system in recognition between individual spiny mice. Physiology & Behavior, 42, 217–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. PORTER, R. H. (1988). The ontogeny of sibling recognition in rodents: Superfamily Muroidea. Behavior Genetics, 18, 483–494.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. PORTER, R. H., MATOCHIK, J. A., & MAKIN, J. W. (1986). Discrimination between full-sibling spiny mice (Acomys cahirinus) by olfactory signatures. Animal Behaviour, 34, 1182–1188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. PORTER, R. H., & RÜTTLE, K. (1975). The responses of one-day old Acomys cahirinus pups to naturally occurring chemical stimuli. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie, 38, 154–162.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. SHKOLNIK, A. (1966). Studies in the comparative biology of Israeli’s two species of spiny mice (Genus Acomys). Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Hebrew University, Jersualem.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Behavior Analysis International 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alexander J. Skolnick
    • 1
  • Marjorie Goldman
    • 1
  • Ethel Tobach
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of MammalogyThe American Museum of Natural HistoryNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations