Advertisement

The Psychological Record

, Volume 42, Issue 4, pp 519–524 | Cite as

Overconfidence in a Multiple-Choice Test and its Relationship to Achievement

  • Dan Zakay
  • Joseph Glicksohn
Article

Abstract

Forty-three students completed a multiple-choice test, and their confidence in the correctness of their chosen responses was assessed. It was found that overconfident students received significantly lower grades as compared with students who were not overconfident. The cognitive mechanisms which may be responsible for the influence of overconfidence on performance in multiple-choice tests are discussed.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. ALBANESE, M. A., & SALERS, D. L. (1988). Multiple true-false items: A study of interitem correlations, scoring alternatives, and reliability estimation. Journal of Educational Measurement, 25(2), 111–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. DOLLY, J. P., & WILLIAMS, K. S. (1986). Using test-taking strategies to maximize multiple-choice test scores. Educational & Psychological Measurement, 46(3), 619–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. FISCHHOFF, B., & MACGREGOR, D. (1981). Selective confidence in forecasts. Technical Report, Ptr-1092-81-12. Woodland Hills, CA: Perceptronics.Google Scholar
  4. KORIAT, A., LICHTENSTEIN, S., & FISCHHOFF, B. (1980). Reasons for confidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 107–118.Google Scholar
  5. LICHTENSTEIN, S., FISCHHOFF, B., & PHILLIPS, L. D. (1977). Calibration of probabilities: The state of the art. In H. Jugerman & G. Dezeenn (Eds.), Decision making and change in human affairs. Amsterdam: D. Reidel.Google Scholar
  6. SLOVIC, P., FISCHHOFF, B., & LICHTENSTEIN, S. (1977). Behavioral decision theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 28, 1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. WILCOX, B. M., & BRYANT, H. D. (1988). A descriptive model of decision making: Review of idiographic influences. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 22(1), 5–22.Google Scholar
  8. WILCOX, R. R., & WILCOX, K. T. (1988). Models of decision-making processes for multiple-choice test items: An analysis of spatial ability. Journal of Educational Measurement, 25(2), 125–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. WILCOX, R. R., WILCOX, K. T., & CHUNG, J. (1988). A note on decision making processes for multiple-choice test items. Journal of Educational Measurement, 25(3), 247–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. ZAKAY, D. (1985). Post-decisional confidence and conflict experienced in a choice process. Acta Psychologica, 58, 75–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. ZAKAY, D. (1990). The role of personal tendencies in the selection of decisionmaking strategies. The Psychological Record, 40, 207–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Behavior Analysis International 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dan Zakay
    • 1
  • Joseph Glicksohn
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyTel Aviv UniversityRamat AvivIsrael

Personalised recommendations