Advertisement

The Psychological Record

, Volume 40, Issue 2, pp 173–185 | Cite as

A Categorical Analysis of Children’s Attributions for Social Success and Failure

  • Brian M. Earn
  • Michael P. Sobol
Articles
  • 1 Downloads

Abstract

The social attributions of Grades 4 and 5 children were assessed within an open-ended interview format. Children were classified according to the number of peer acceptances and rejections they received and were then asked to explain hypothetical instances of social success and failure. They also completed measures of expectation of success and social self-esteem. The results indicated that sociometrie status, as measured by both acceptance and rejection, influenced the types of causes that children used. Children with high acceptance and low rejection scores utilized causes that were significantly more controllable than were those causes provided by any of the other groups of children. The implications of these findings for future research on children’s social attributions are discussed.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. AMES, R., AMES, C., & GARRISON, W. (1977). Children’s causal ascriptions for positive and negative interpersonal outcomes. Psychological Reports, 41, 595–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. ANDERSON, C. A. (1983). The causal structure of situations: The generation of plausible causal attributions as a function of type of event situation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 185–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. ANDERSON, C. A., HOROWITZ, L. M., & FRENCH, R. D. (1983). Attributional style of lonely and depressed people. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 127–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. BAR-TAL, D., & DAROM, E. (1979). Pupils’ attributions for success and failure. Child Development, 50, 264–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. COIE, J., DODGE, K., & COPPOTELLI, H. (1982). Dimensions and types of social status: A cross-age perspective. Developmental Psychology, 18, 557–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. COOPERSMITH, S. (1967). The antecedents of self-esteem. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
  7. COWEN, E. L., PEDERSON, A., BABIJIAN, H., IZZO, L. D. & TROST, N. A. (1973). Long-term follow-up of early detected vulnerable children. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 41, 438–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. DODGE, K. A. (1983). Behavioral antecedents of peer social status. Child Development, 54, 1386–1399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. DWECK, C. S., & LEGGETT, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95, 256–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. ELIG, T., & FRIEZE, I. (1975). A multi-dimensional scheme for coding and interpreting perceived causality for success and failure events: The coding scheme of perceived causality (CSPC). Jsas: Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 5, 313.Google Scholar
  11. FRIEZE, I., & SNYDER, H. (1980). Children’s beliefs about the causes of success and failure in school settings. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 186–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. GOETZ, T., & DWECK, C. (1980). Learned helplessness in social situations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 246–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. GRONLUND, N. E. (1959). Sociometry in the classroom. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
  14. GOTTMAN, J. (1977). Towards a definition of social isolation in children. Child Development, 48, 513–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. HARTUP, W. (1970). Peer interaction and social organization. In P. Mussen (Ed.), Carmichael’s manual of child psychology (Vol. 2. pp. 361–456). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  16. KAHNEMAN, D., & MILLER, D. T. (1986). Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives. Psychological Review, 93, 136–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. KOKENES, B. (1974). Grade level differences in factors of self esteem. Developmental Psychology, 10, 954–958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. LEFCOURT, H., VON BAEYER, C., WARE, E. E., & COX, D. (1979). The multidimensional-multiattributional causality scale: The development of a goal specific locus of control scale. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 11, 286–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. MICHELA, J. L., PEPLAU, L. A., & WEEKS, D. G. (1982). Perceived dimensions of attributions for loneliness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 929–936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. PARKER, J. G., & ASHER, S. R. (1987). Peer relations and later personal adjustment: Are low-accepted children at risk? Psychological Bulletin, 102, 357–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. PEARL, R., BRYAN, T., & DONAHUE, M. (1980). Learning disabled children’s attributions for success and failure. Learning Disability Quarterly, 3, 3–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. RAVIV, A., BAR-TAL, D., RAVIV, A., & BAR-TAL, Y. (1980). Causal perceptions of success and failure by advantaged, integrated and disadvantaged pupils. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 50, 137–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. SOBOL, M. P., EARN, B., BENNETT, D., & HUMPHRIES, T. (1983). A categorical analysis of the sociafattributions of learning-disabled children. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 11, 217–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. WEINER, B. (1979). A theory of motivation for some classroom experiences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 3–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. WEINER, B. (1983). Some methodological pitfalls in attribution research. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 530–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. WEINER, B. (1986). An attributions! theory of motivation and emotion. New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Behavior Analysis International 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Brian M. Earn
    • 1
  • Michael P. Sobol
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of GuelphGuelph, OntarioCanada

Personalised recommendations