The Psychological Record

, Volume 40, Issue 4, pp 541–554 | Cite as

Verbal Self-Reports as a Function of Speed, Accuracy, and Reinforcement of the Reported Performance

  • Thomas S. Critchfield
  • Michael Perone


Undergraduates reported about their performance on a delayed matching-to-sample (DMTS) task in which monetary reinforcers depended on both speed and accuracy. They made the reports by pressing “Yes” or “No” buttons to answer computer- presented queries about the speed, accuracy, or reinforcement of their performance on the just-completed DMTS trial. Reports about accuracy were positively, but not strongly, correlated with actual performance. Reports about speed were consistently biased in favor of affirmative reports, with subjects reporting that their DMTS responses were fast enough to earn reinforcement, regardless of actual response speed. Reports about reinforcement showed substantial intersubject variability. Manipulating the interval between DMTS performance and the self-report (from 3 s to 27 s) had no systematic influence on the correspondence between reports and performance, regardless of whether a distractor task was required during the interval. These results are inconsistent with an hypothesis that individuals performing speeded choice tasks directly monitor both speed and accuracy. The experiment illustrates the viability of studying verbal self-reports as operant behavior under discriminative control of some, but possibly not all, aspects of the reported performance.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. BARON, A., & MENICH, S. R. (1985a). Reaction times of older and younger men: Effects of compound samples and a prechoice signal on delayed matching-to-sample performance. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 40, 275–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. BARON, A., & MENICH, S. R. (1985b). Age-related effects of temporal contingencies on response speed and memory: An operant analysis. Journal of Gerontology, 40, 60–70.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. CRITCHFIELD, T. S., & PERONE, M. (1990). Verbal self-reports of delayed matching-to-sample by humans. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 53, 321–344.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. DUVAL, S., & WICKLUND, R. A. (1972). A theory of objective self-awareness. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  5. EPSTEIN, R., LANZA, R. P., & SKINNER, B. F. (1981). “Self-awareness” in the pigeon. Science, 212, 695–696.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. ERICSSON, K. A., & SIMON, H. A. (1984). Protocol analysis: Verbal self-reports as data. Cambridge, MA: The Mit Press.Google Scholar
  7. HALBREICH, U., BAKHAI, Y., BACON, K. B., GOLDSTEIN, S., ASNIS, G. M., ENDICOTT, J., & LESSER, J. (1989). The normalcy of self-proclaimed “normal volunteers.” American Journal of Psychiatry, 146, 1052–1055.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. HEFFERLINE, R. F., & PERERA, T. B. (1963). Proprioceptive discrimination of a covert operant without its observation by the subject. Science, 139, 834–835.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. KORIAT, A., LICHTENSTEIN, S., & FISCHOFF, B. (1980). Reasons for overconfidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 107–118.Google Scholar
  10. LUBINSKI, D., & THOMPSON, T. (1987). An animal model of the interpersonal communication of interoceptive (private) states. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 48, 1–15.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. LUCE, R. D. (1986). Response times: Their role in inferring elementary mental organization. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. MIDANIK, L. T., KLATSKY, A. L, & ARMSTRONG, M. A. (1989). A comparison of 7-day recall with two summary measures of alcohol use. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 24, 127–134.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. MILLER, D. T, & ROSS, M. (1975). Self-serving biases in the attribution of causality: Fact or fiction? Psychologcal Bulletin, 82, 213–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. NISBETT, R. E., & WILSON, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84, 231–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. PETERSON, L. R., & PETERSON, M. J. (1959). Short-term retention of individual verbal items. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, 193–198.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. RABBITT, P. (1966). Errors and error-correction in a choice-response task. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71, 254–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. RABBITT, P. (1968). Three kinds of error-signalling responses in a serial choice task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 20, 179–188.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. RABBITT, P. M. A. (1979). How old and young subjects monitor and control responses for accuracy and speed. British Journal of Psychology, 70, 305–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. REYNOLDS, G. S. (1966). Discrimination and emission of temporal intervals by pigeons. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 9, 65–68.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. RISLEY, T, & HART, B. (1968). Developing correspondence between the verbal and nonverbal behavior of preschool children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 267–281.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. SHIMP, C. P. (1982). On metaknowledge in the pigeon: An organism’s knowledge about its own behavior. Animal Learning & Behavior, 10, 358–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. SHIMP, C. P. (1983). The local organization of behavior: Dissociations between a pigeon’s behavior and self-reports of that behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 39, 61–68.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. SIDMAN, M. (1960). Tactics of scientific research. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  24. SKINNER, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. WECHSLER, D. (1981). Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scales - Revised. New York: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
  26. ZIRIAX, J. M., & SILBERBERG, A. (1978). Discrimination and emission of different key-peck durations in the pigeon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 4, 1–21.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Behavior Analysis International 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas S. Critchfield
    • 1
  • Michael Perone
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyIllinois State UniversityNormalUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyWest Virginia UniversityMorgantownUSA

Personalised recommendations