Advertisement

The Psychological Record

, Volume 40, Issue 4, pp 505–516 | Cite as

Matching to Complex Samples: Further Study of Arbitrary Stimulus Classes

  • Robert Stromer
  • Joan Butcher Stromer
Article

Abstract

College students learned matching to sample where high and low tones were related to one set of forms (A-C relations), red and green hues were related to a second set of forms (B-D), and the tone/color complexes were related to a third set of forms (AB-E). Emergent relations among the five sets of stimuli (e.g., A-D, B-C, C-E, and E-D) were assessed and performances for 13 of 14 subjects suggested the formation of five-member equivalence classes. Eight subjects also received a test (AF-D) with new colors displayed as elements of sample complexes; subsequent test performances (e.g., B-F, F-C, and E-F) for seven of these subjects suggested six-member equivalence classes. Thus, the merger of arbitrary relations into equivalence classes may be based on the development of control by redundant elements of sample complexes. Analyses of variables studied in associative learning may help to determine the parameters of such control and their relationship to stimulus equivalence.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. CATANIA, A. C. (1984). Learning (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  2. DEVANY, J. M., HAYES, S. C, & NELSON, R. O. (1986). Equivalence class formation in language-able and language-disabled children. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 46, 243–257.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. FIELDS, L., & VERHAVE, T. (1987). The structure of equivalence classes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 48, 317–332.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. FIELDS, L., VERHAVE, T., & FATH, S. (1984). Stimulus equivalence and transitive associations: A methodological analysis. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 42, 143–157.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. LAZAR, R. M., DAVIS-LANG, D., & SANCHEZ, L. (1984). The formation of stimulus equivalences in children. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 41, 251–266.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. LOVAAS, O. I., KOEGEL, R. L., & SCHREIBMAN, L. (1979). Stimulus overselectivity in autism: A review of research. Psychological Bulletin, 86. 1236–1254.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. MACKINTOSH, N. J. (1974). The psychology of animal learning. New York: Acadsmic PressGoogle Scholar
  8. RUDOLPH, R. L., & VAN HOUTEN, R. (1977). Auditory stimulus control in pigeons: Jenkins and Harrison (1960) revisited. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 27, 327–330.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. SIDMAN, M. (1986). Functional analysis of emergent verbal classes. In T. Thompson & M. D. Zeiler (Eds.), Analysis and integration of behavioral units (pp. 213–245). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  10. SIDMAN, M., Kirk, B., & WILLSON-MORRIS, M. (1985). Six-member stimulus classes generated by conditional discrimination procedures. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 43, 21–42.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. SIDMAN, M., & TAILBY, W. (1982). Conditional discrimination vs. matching-to-sample: An expansion of the testing paradigm. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 5–22.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. SIDMAN, M., WILLSON-MORRIS, M., & KIRK, B. (1986). Matching-to-sample procedures and the development of equivalence relations: The role of naming. Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 6, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. STROMER, R, & OSBORNE, J. G. (1982). Control of adolescents’ arbitrary matching-to-sample by positive and negative stimulus relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 329–348.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. STROMER, R., & STROMER, J. B. (1990). The formation of arbitrary stimulus classes in matching to complex samples. The Psychological Record, 40, 51–66.Google Scholar
  15. WILLIAMS, B. A. (1984). Stimulus control and associative learning. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 42, 469–483.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Behavior Analysis International 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert Stromer
    • 1
    • 2
  • Joan Butcher Stromer
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Northern Michigan UniversityUSA
  2. 2.Behavior Analysis DepartmentEunice Kennedy Shriver CenterWalthamUSA

Personalised recommendations