Skip to main content
Log in

The Foundation of a Scientific Theory of Music

  • Article
  • Published:
The Psychological Record Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Most, if not all, theories of music are based upon the partitions between mind and body, subject and object, and the natural and the artificial which are contained in ordinary language. It is suggested herein that a scientific theory of music must be founded upon the Galilean concept of participation. This concept not only modifies the meaning of the word “music,” but it enlarges the conventional meaning of the word “mind.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ARISTOTLE (1941). Metaphysics. In R. McKeon (Ed. and Trans.), The basic works of Aristotle (pp. 681–926). New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • BABBITT, M. (1969). Who cares if you listen? In G. Chase (Ed.), The American composer speaks: A historical anthology, 1770–1965 (pp. 235–244). Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • BARLOW, W. (1953). Foundations of music. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • BINKERD, G. (1960). [Discussion by Gordon Binkerd]. In D. Kraehenbuehl, N. Philps, H. Murphy, G. Binkerd, & R. Melcher, “The professional music theorist: A forum.” Journal of Music Theory, 4(1), 77–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BLOOM, A. (1987). The closing of the American mind: How higher education has failed democracy and impoverished the souls of today’s students. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • BLUME, F. (1972). Musical scholarship today. In B. S. Brook, E. O. D. Downes, & S. Van Solkema (Eds.), Perspectives in musicology: The inaugural lectures of the Ph. D. program in music at the City University of New York (pp. 15–31). New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • BROWN, S. (1988). The sense of music. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • BYRNSIDE, R. L. (1985). Music: Sound and sense. Dubuque, IA: Wm. C. Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • CASTELL, A. (1935). A college logic: An introduction to the study of argument and proof. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • CLIFTON, T. (1973). Music and the a priori. Journal of Music Theory, 17(1), 66–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • COLLIER, J. L. (1970). Practical music theory: How music is put together from Bach to rock. New York: Grosset & Dunlap.

    Google Scholar 

  • COOPER, P. (1973). Perspectives in music theory: An historical-analytical approach. New York: Dodd, Mead, & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • DUKAS, H., & HOFFMAN, B. (1979). Albert Einstein: The human side. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • EINSTEIN, A. (1961). Relativity: The special and the general theory. New York: Bonanza Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • EINSTEIN, A., & INFELD, L. (1950). The evolution of physics: The growth of ideas from early concepts to relativity and quanta. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • ERICKSON, R. (1982). New music and psychology. In D. Deutsch (Ed.), The psychology of music (pp. 517–536). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • FERRARA, L. (1984). Phenomenology as a tool for musical analysis. The Musical Ouarterly, 70(3), 355–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GALILEI, G. (1967). Dialogue concerning the two chief world systems - Ptolemy & Copernican (S. Drake, Trans.; 2nd rev. ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press.

  • GILLESPIE, J. (1968). The musical experience. Belmont, CA.: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • GRIFFITHS, P. (1980). Aleatory. In S. Sadie (Ed.), The new Grove dictionary of music and musicians (Vol.1, pp. 237–242). London: The Macmillan Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • GURALNIK, D. B. (1967). Webster’s new world dictionary of the American language (2nd edition). New York: William Collins & World Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • HEISENBERG, W. (1958). Physics and philosophy: The revolution in modern science. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • HENRY, E. (1988). Fundamentals of music. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • HOFFER, C. R. (1967). The understanding of music. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • ISAACS, A., & MARTIN, E. (1983). Dictionary of music. New York: Facts on File Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • KRAEHENBUEHL, D. (1960). [Discussion by David Kraehenbuehl]. In D. Kraehenbuehl, N. Phelps, H. Murphy, G. Binkerd, & R. Melcher, “The professional music theorist: A forum.” Journal of Music Theory, 4(1), 62–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KRUTCH, J. W. (1954). The measure of man; on freedom, human values, survival and the modern temper. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • KUHN, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • LANG, P. H. (1941). Music in western civilization. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • LANG, P. H. (1960). [Introduction]. In P. H. Lang (Ed.), Problems of modern music: The Princeton seminar in advanced musical studies (pp. 7–16). New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • LANG, P. H. (1972). Musicology and related disciplines. In B. S. Brooks, E. O. Downes, & S. Van Solkema (Eds.), Perspectives in musicology: The inaugural lectures of the Ph. D. program in music at the City University of New York (pp. 185–201). New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • LEWIS, C. S. (1947). The aboliton of man: How education develops man’s sense of morality. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • LICHTENSTEIN, P. E. (1984). Interbehaviorism in psychology and in the philosophy of science. The Psychological Record, 34, 455–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MCLARTY, M. H. (1990). An examination of modern psychology through two philosophies of knowledge. The Psychological Record, 40, 273–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • MOROWITZ, H. J. (1981). Rediscovering the mind. In D. R. Hofstadter & D. C. Dennett (Eds.), The mind’s I (pp. 32–42). Toronto: Bantam Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • MURPHY, H. (1960). [Discussion by Howard Murphy]. In D. Kraehenbuehl, N. Phelps, H. Murphy, G. Binkerd, & R. Melcher, “The professional music theorist: A forum.” Journal of Music Theory, 4(1), 75–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NARMOUR, E. (1977). Beyond Schenkerism: The need for alternatives in music analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • PISTON, W. (1969). Harmony (3rd ed.). New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • POLITOSKE, D. T. (1979). Music (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • ROWELL, L. (1983). Thinking about music: An introduction to the philosophy of music. Amherst, MA: The University of Massachusetts Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • SERAFINE, M. L. (1984). [Review of Diana Deutsch’s The psychology of music]. Journal of Music Theory, 27(2), 134–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SESSIONS, R. (1960). Problems and issues facing the composer today. In P. H. Lang (Ed.), Problems of modern music: The Princeton seminar in advanced musical studies (pp. 21–33). New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • SKINNER, B. F. (1987). Whatever happened to psychology as the science of behavior? American Psychologist, 42(8), 780–786.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SNOW, C. P. (1965). The two cultures: And a second look. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • TAYLOR, S. (1967). Sound and music: A non-mathematical treatise on the physical constitution of musical sounds and harmony, including the chief acoustical discoveries of Professor Helmholtz. London: Macmillan and Co. [Originally published in 1873].

    Google Scholar 

  • THOMPSON, O. (1935). How to understand music. New York: The Dial Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • WINK, R. L, & WILLIAMS, L. G. (1976). Invitation to listening (2nd ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • WINOLD, A. (1979). Introduction to music theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • WISHART, T. (1977). On radical culture. In J. Shepard, P. Virden, G. Vulliamy, & T. Wishart, Whose music?: A sociology of musical language (pp. 233–256). New Brunswick, NJ: Transactions, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

McLarty, M.H., Braun, W.H. & Benitez, V.P. The Foundation of a Scientific Theory of Music. Psychol Rec 40, 491–504 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03399536

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03399536

Navigation