Abstract
Intermittent reinforcement may lead to higher response rates than 100% reinforcement when it is delayed and when there are stimuli during the delay that are correlated with the type of delay (reinforced or nonreinforced). Two experiments were carried out to evaluate the hypothesis that this effect is due to the same variables that are hypothesized to control behavioral contrast. In Experiment 1 two chain schedules were arranged so that any contrast effect should appear in the chain terminating with 100% reinforcement rather than in the chain with 50% reinforcement. In Experiment 2 an intertrial interval was employed to increase the amount of contrast in all chains and possibly wipe out the intermittent reinforcement effect. Increasing the intertrial interval did lead to a contrast effect, but did not eliminate the effect of intermittent reinforcement. Some other mechanism, possibly the value of conditioned reinforcement, is responsible for this effect.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
BRANCH, M. 1977. Signalled and unsignalled percentage reinforcement of performance under a chained schedule. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 27, 71–83.
FANTINO, E. 1977. Conditioned reinforcement: Choice and information. In W.K. Honig & J.E.R. Staddon (Eds.), Handbook of operant behavior. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
FANTINO, E., DUNN, R., & MECK, W. 1979. Percentage reinforcement and choice. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 32, 335–340.
KENDALL, S.B. 1973. Effects of two procedures for varying information transmission on observing responses. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 20, 73–83.
KENDALL, S.B. 1974. Preference for intermittent reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 21, 463–473.
KENDALL, S.B. 1975. Enhancement of conditioned reinforcement by uncertainty. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 24, 311–314.
MICHAEL, J.L. 1979. Reinforcement magnitude and the inhibiting effect of reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 32, 265–268.
RACHLIN, H. 1973. Contrast and matching. Psychological Review, 80, 217–234.
SCHWARTZ, B., & GAMZU, E. 1977. Pavlovian control of operant behavior. In W.K. Honig & J.E.R. Staddon (Eds.), Handbook of operant behavior. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
STADDON, J.E.R., & INNIS, N.K. 1969. Reinforcement omission in fixed-interval schedules. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 12, 689–700.
WILLIAMS, B.A. 1979. Contrast, component duration, and the following schedule of reinforcement. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 5, 379–396.
WILTON, R.N. 1972. The role of information in the emission of observing responses and partial reinforcement acquisition phenomena. Learning and Motivation, 3, 479–499.
WILTON, R.N., & CLEMENTS, R.O. 1971. Observing responses and informative stimuli. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 15, 199–204.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kendall, S.B. Percentage Reinforcement and Behavioral Contrast in Chain Schedules. Psychol Rec 32, 75–84 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03399524
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03399524