Advertisement

Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics

, Volume 151, Issue 1, pp 1–25 | Cite as

Effects of a Higher Replacement Rate on Unemployment Durations, Employment, and Earnings

  • Beatrix Eugster
Open Access
Article
  • 78 Downloads

Summary

This paper discusses the effects of a higher unemployment benefit replacement rate on unemployment durations, employment, and earnings. A reform of the Swiss unemployment insurance in July 2003 increased the replacement rate by up to 5.88 ppt for individuals who earned between 3,536 and 4,340 CHF and have no children, while it did not change the replacement rate for all other unemployed persons. This allows to study the effects of a higher replacement rate adopting a difference-in-differences (DiD) approach. The change in the replacement rate increased unemployment durations by 3.1 % — or roughly one week — for the treatment group. Women tend to react stronger than men. There is no effect of the level of the replacement rate on employment probabilities or earnings after the unemployment spell is finished.

JEL-Classification

J21 J64 

Keywords

unemployment durations unemployment insurance replacement rate post-unemployment outcomes 

References

  1. Addison, John T., and Mckinley L. Blackburn (2000), “The Effects of Unemployment Insurance on Postunemployment Earnings”, Labour Economics, 7, pp. 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arni, Patrick, Rafael Lalive, and Jan C. van Ours (2013), “How Effective Are Unemployment Benefit Sanctions? Looking Beyond Unemployment Exit”, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 28(7), pp. 1153–1178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Atkinson, Anthony B., and John Micklewright (1991), “Unemployment Compensation and Labor Market Transitions: A Critical Review”, Journal of Economic Literature, 29(4), pp. 1679–1727.Google Scholar
  4. Barbanchon, Thomas Le (2012), “The Effect of the Potential Duration of Unemployment Benefits on Unemployment Exits to Work and Match Quality in France”, Working Papers 2012–21, Centre de Recherche en Economie et Statistique.Google Scholar
  5. Browning, Martin, and Thomas F. Crossley (2001), “The Life-Cycle Model of Consumption and Saving”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15, pp. 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Campbell, Donald T. (1969), “Prospective: Artifact and Control”, in Artifact in Behavioral Research, Robert Rosenthal and Ralph L Rosnow, eds., New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  7. Card, David, Raj Chetty, and Andrea Weber (2007), “Cash-on-Hand and Competing Models of Intertemporal Behavior: New Evidence from the Labor Market”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122(4), pp. 1511–1560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carling, Kenneth, Bertil Holmlund, and Altin Vejsiu (2001), “Do Benefit Cuts Boost Job Finding? Swedish Evidence from the 1990s”, The Economic Journal, 111, pp. 766–790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Centeno, Mario, and Alvares A. Novo (2009), “Reemployment Wages and UI Liquidity Effect: A Regression Discontinuity Approach”, Portuguese Economic Journal, 8, pp. 45–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chetty, Raj (2008), “Moral Hazard versus Liquidity and Optimal Unemployment Insurance”, Journal of Political Economy, 116(2), pp. 173–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Degen, Kathrin, and Rafael Lalive (2014), “How Does a Reduction in Potential Benefit Duration Affect Medium-Run Earnings and Employment?”, mimeo, University of Lausanne.Google Scholar
  12. Eugster, Beatrix, Rafael Lalive, Andreas Steinhauer, and Josef Zweimüller (2011), “The Demand for Social Insurance: Does Culture Matter?”, The Economic Journal, 121(556), F413–F448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Eugster, Beatrix, Rafael Lalive, and Josef Zweimüller (2009), “Does Culture Matter for Unemployment? Evidence from the Roesti Border”, Iza Working Paper.Google Scholar
  14. Eugster, Beatrix, and Raphael Parchet (2011), “Culture and Taxes: Towards Identifying Tax Competition”, Cahier de recherche, Deep.Google Scholar
  15. Fredriksson, Peter, and Bertil Holmlund (2006), “Improving Incentives in Unemployment Insurance: A Review of Recent Research”, Journal of Economic Surveys, 20(3), pp. 357–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Holmlund, Bertil (1998), “Unemployment Insurance in Theory and Practice”, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 100(1), pp. 113–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kroft, Kory, and Matthew J. Notowidigdo (2011), “Should Unemployment Insurance Vary with the Unemployment Rate? Theory and Evidence”, NBER Working Paper 17173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lalive, Rafael (2007), “Unemployment Benefits, Unemployment Duration, and Post-Unemployment Jobs: A Regression Discontinuity Approach”, American Economic Review, 97(2), pp. 108–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lalive, Rafael, Jan C. van Ours, and Josef Zweimüller (2006), “How Changes in Financial Incentives Affect the Duration of Unemployment”, Review of Economic Studies, 73, pp. 1009–1038.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lee, Myoung-jae, and Changhui Kang (2006), “Identification for Difference in Differences with Cross-Section and Panel Data”, Economics Letters, 92(2), pp. 270–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Meyer, Bruce D. (1990), “Unemployment Insurance and Unemployment Spells”, Econometrica, 58(4), pp. 757–782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Meyer, Bruce D., and Wallace K. C. Mok (2007), “Quasi-Experimental Evidence on the Effects of Unemployment Insurance from New York State”, NBER Working Papers 12865, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mortensen, Dale T. (1977), “Unemployment Insurance and Job Search Decisions”, Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 30(4), pp. 505–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nickell, Stephen (1979), “Estimating the Probability of Leaving Unemployment”, Econometrica, 47(5), pp. 1249–1266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pissarides, Christopher A. (1994), “Search Unemployment with On-the-job Search”, The Review of Economic Studies, 61, pp. 457–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Roed, Knut, and Tao Zhang (2003), “Does Unemployment Compensation Affect Unemployment Duration?”, The Economic Journal, 113, pp. 190–206.Google Scholar
  27. Rosenbaum, Paul R. (1987), “The Role of a Second Control Group in an Observational Study”, Statistical Science, 2(3), pp. 292–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Schmieder, Johannes F., Till von Wachter, and Stefan Bender (2012), “Causes and Consequences of Unemployment: New Microeconomic Evidence and Perspectives”, American Economic Review: Papers & Proceedings, 102(3), pp. 514–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. van Ours, Jan C., and Milan Vodopivec (2008), “Does Reducing Unemployment Insurance Generosity Reduce Job Match Quality?”, Journal of Public Economics, 92(3-4), pp. 684–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Swiss Society of Economics and Statistics 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Disability and IntegrationUniversity of St. GallenSt. GallenSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations