Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics

, Volume 149, Issue 2, pp 115–135 | Cite as

The Swiss debt brake — has it been a success?

  • Tobias Beljean
  • Alain Geier
Open Access


This paper describes how the Swiss fiscal rule at federal level has fared since it was introduced in 2003. Generally speaking, the rule has modified the budget process and led to a better implementation of fiscal policy objectives. It is argued that the most important factor is the existence of a binding ceiling for expenditure. The design of the mechanism is important in setting the right incentives. A basic feature of the rule is its simplicity and transparency. It is argued that an increase in sophistication would eliminate this advantage without guaranteeing preferable outcomes. It appears that the rule has contributed to a substantial reduction in nominal debt. This outcome has occurred against the backdrop of a favourable economic situation (which was not anticipated) and is primarily attributable to an underestimation of both revenues and economic growth. Nominal debt reduction may not materialise to the same extent under different circumstances. It appears that systematic underspending with respect to the budget leads to a bias towards budget surpluses. In addition, there has been no visible reduction in the quality of budget composition, and the fiscal policy stance as measured by the change in the cyclically adjusted budget balance has been appropriate given the prevailing economic conditions. While some design features may be debatable, the overall rules-based approach to fiscal policy has been successful.




debt debt brake fiscal rules Switzerland 


  1. Alesina, Alberto, and Roberto Perotti (1995), “The Political Economy of Budget Deficits”, IMF Staff Papers, 42, pp. 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. BAK Basel (2011), Erreichbarkeit als Standortfaktor: Globale und Kontinentale Erreichbarkeit im Jahr 2010, Öffentlicher Bericht zur Projektphase 2011.Google Scholar
  3. Bodmer, Frank (2006), “The Swiss Debt Brake: How it Works and What Can Go Wrong”, Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics, 142(3), pp. 307–330.Google Scholar
  4. Brennan, Geoffrey, and James M. Buchanan (1985), The Reason of Rules: Constitutional Political Economy, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bruchez, Pierre-Alain (2003), «Réexamen du calcul du coefficient k», Swiss Federal Finance Administration, Working Paper 2.Google Scholar
  6. Bruchez, Pierre-Alain, and Eva Matter Schaffner (2011), «Des règles budgétaires pour les assurances sociales», La Vie économique 1/2–2011.Google Scholar
  7. Colombier, Carsten (2003), „Der Zusammenhang zwischen dem Bruttoinlandsprodukt und den Schweizer Bundeseinnahmen“, Swiss Federal Finance Administration, Working Paper 5.Google Scholar
  8. Dabàn, Teresa, Enrica Detragiache, Gabriel di Bella, Gian Maria Milesi-Ferretti, and Steven Symansky (2003), “Rules-Based Fiscal Policy in France, Germany, Italy and Spain”, IMF Occasional Paper, 225.Google Scholar
  9. Danninger, Stephan (2002), “A New Rule: ‘The Swiss Debt Brake’”, IMF Working Paper, 02/18.Google Scholar
  10. Debrun, Xavier, Natan P. Epstein, and Steven A. Symansky (2008), “A New Fiscal Rule: Should Israel Go Swiss?”, IMF Working Paper 08/87.Google Scholar
  11. Economiesuisse (2008), Nachhaltige Finanzpolitik für Wachstum und Wohlstand.Google Scholar
  12. Federal Council (2000), „Botschaft zur Schuldenbremse vom 5. Juli 2000“, Bundesblatt 2000, 35, pp. 4653–4726.Google Scholar
  13. Federal Council (2001), „Zusatzbericht zur Botschaft zur Schuldenbremse vom 10. Januar 2001“, Bundesblatt 2001, 24, pp. 2387–2420.Google Scholar
  14. Federal Council (2003), „Botschaft zum Entlastungsprogramm EP 03 vom 2. Juli 2003“, Bundesblatt 32, pp. 5615–5802.Google Scholar
  15. Federal Council (2005), „Botschaft zum Entlastungsprogramm EP 04 vom 8. Februar 2005“, Bundesblatt 5, pp. 5615–5802.Google Scholar
  16. Federal Council (2008), Botschaft über die Ergänzungsregel zur Schuldenbremse vom 19. September 2008, Bundesblatt 2008, 42, pp. 8491–8540.Google Scholar
  17. Federal Department of Finance (2012), Report on the Long-Term Sustainability of Public Finances in Switzerland.Google Scholar
  18. Geier, Alain (2011), “The Debt Brake – the Swiss Fiscal Rule at the Federal Level”, Federal Finance Administration, Working Paper 15.Google Scholar
  19. Gfs Bern (2012), Schlussbericht zum „Finanzmonitor 2012“, Studie im Auftrag von economiesuisse.Google Scholar
  20. von Hagen, Jürgen (1992), “Budgeting Procedures and Fiscal Performance in the European Community”, in: Commission of the European Community, Economic Papers, 96.Google Scholar
  21. Kopits, George, and Steven A. Symansky (1998), “Fiscal Policy Rules”, IMF Occasional Paper 162.Google Scholar
  22. Kumar, Manmohan, Emanuele Baldacci, Andrea Schaechter, Carlos Caceres, Daehaeng Kim, Xavier Debrun, Julio Escolano, Jiri Jonas, Philippe Karam, Irina Yakadina and Robert Zymek (2009), Fiscal Rules – Anchoring Expectations for Sustainable Public Finances, Washington.Google Scholar
  23. Lampart, Daniel (2005), „Die konjunkturelle Ausrichtung der Schweizer Finanzpolitik im internationalen Vergleich“, KOF Working Papers, 109.Google Scholar
  24. Schaltegger, Christoph A., and Martin Weder (2010), „Fiskalpolitik als antizyklisches Instrument? Eine Betrachtung der Schweiz“, Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, 11(2), pp. 146–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Swiss Society of Economics and Statistics 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tobias Beljean
  • Alain Geier

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations