Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics

, Volume 149, Issue 1, pp 27–56 | Cite as

Spatial and temporal aggregation in racial profiling

  • Dragan Ilić
Open Access


In the last decade, models of rational choice have chimed into the discussion on racial profiling, the use of race in stop and search decisions of the police. The models describe the behavior of motorists and the police and provide empirical tests to assess the question whether the police exhibit racial animus. However, existing studies have neglected the effect of spatial and temporal aggregation of the data on the application of the tests. Using data from the Florida Highway Patrol, this paper shows that regional subsets disclose policing behavior which deviates substantially from the aggregate. Broad conclusions on the absence or presence of racial prejudice are thus at risk of being unfounded. In addition, the disaggregated analysis suggests that the empirical tests implied by the rational choice models are not applicable to all observed regions. The results call for a cautious application of the tests and the interpretation of their conclusions.


J71 K42 


Racial Profiling Crime Police Rational Choice Outcome Test Aggregation 


  1. Antonovics, Kate L., and Brian G. Knight (2004), “A New Look at Racial Profiling: Evidence from the Boston Police Department”, NBER Working Paper, 10634.Google Scholar
  2. Anwar, Shamena, and Hanming Fang (2006), “An Alternative Test of Racial Prejudice in Motor Vehicle Searches: Theory and Evidence”, American Economic Review, 96(1), pp. 127–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arrow, Kenneth J. (1973), “The Theory of Discrimination”, in Orley Ashenfelter and Albert Rees (eds.), Discrimination in Labor Markets, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 3–33.Google Scholar
  4. Ayres, Ian (2002), “Outcome Tests of Racial Disparities in Police Practices”, Justice Research and Policy, 4, pp. 131–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Becker, Gary S. (1957), The Economics of Discrimination, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  6. Becker, Gary S. (1968), “Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach”, Journal of Political Economy, 76(2), pp. 169–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Becker, Gary S. (1993), “The Evidence against Banks Doesn’t Prove Bias”, Business Week, p. 18.Google Scholar
  8. Close, Billy R., and Patrick L. Mason (2007), “Searching for Efficient Enforcement: Officer Characteristics and Racially Biased Policing”, Review of Law and Economics, 3(2), pp. 263–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dharmapala, Dhammika, and Stephen L. Ross (2004), “Racial Bias in Motor Vehicle Searches: Additional Theory and Evidence”, Contributions to Economic Analysis & Policy, 3(1), Article 12.Google Scholar
  10. Durose, Matthew R., Erica L. Smith, and Patrick A. Langan (2007), “Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Report: Contacts between the Police and the Public, 2005”, URL
  11. Harris, David A. (2003), Profiles in Injustice: Why Racial Profiling Cannot Work, The New Press.Google Scholar
  12. Knowles, John, Nicola Persico, and Petra Todd (2001), “Racial Bias in Motor Vehicle Searches: Theory and Evidence”, Journal of Political Economy, 109(1), pp. 203–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lamberth, John (1994), “Revised Statistical Analysis of the Incidence of Police Stops and Arrests of Black Drivers/Travellers on the New Jersey Turnpike between Interchanges 1 and 2 from the Years 1988 through 1991”, Legal Expert Report.Google Scholar
  14. Persico, Nicola (2002), “Racial Profiling, Fairness, and Effectiveness of Policing”, American Economic Review, 92(5), pp. 1472–1497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Persico, Nicola, and David A. Castleman (2005), “Detecting Bias: Using Statistical Evidence to Establish Intentional Discrimination in Racial Profiling Cases”, University of Chicago Legal Forum, pp. 217–235.Google Scholar
  16. Persico, Nicola, and Petra Todd (2005), “Passenger Profiling, Imperfect Screening and Airport Security”, American Economic Review, 95(2), pp. 127–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Persico, Nicola, and Petra Todd (2006), “Generalising the Hit Rates Tests to Test for Racial Bias in Law Enforcement, with an Application to Vehicle Searches in Wichita”, The Economic Journal, 116, pp. F351–F367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Phelps, Edmund S. (1972), “The Statistical Theory of Racism and Sexism”, American Economic Review, 62, pp. 659–661.Google Scholar
  19. Yinger, John (1996), “Why Default Rates Cannot Shed Light on Mortgage Discrimination”, Cityscape: A Journal on Policy Development and Research, 2(1), pp. 25–31.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Swiss Society of Economics and Statistics 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Business and EconomicsUniversity of BaselBaselSwitzerland
  2. 2.Center for Corporate Responsibility and SustainabilityUniversity of ZurichZürichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations