Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics

, Volume 148, Issue 2, pp 317–345 | Cite as

Swiss Energy Strategies under Global Climate Change and Nuclear Policy Uncertainty

Open Access


Domestic strategies for the Swiss energy system are likely to be affected by a range of uncertain global challenges, such as natural resource availability and depletion, international climate change policies, and global technology policies. We analyze technological choices for Switzerland under a stringent global climate policy with modest global energy resources; and the possible consequences of different global or regional policies in response to the recent nuclear accident in Fukushima, Japan. We use MERGE, an integrated assessment model, with a division of the world in 10 regions, including Switzerland and Japan. We find that nuclear energy, including light water reactors or more advanced technologies have the potential to play a major role in the future energy system. The consequences of a moratorium on the construction of new nuclear power plants include the need for additional electricity efficiency measures and the integration of a large share of intermittent renewables, raising additional challenges.


Energy system climate policy resource depletion efficiency renewables 


D58 Q41 Q48 Q54 O33 


  1. Barreto, Leonardo and Socrates Kypreos (2004), “Endogenizing R&D and Market Experience In The Bottom-Up Energy-Systems ERIS model”, Technovation, 24, pp. 615–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. BFS (2010), “Szenarien zur Bevölkerungsentwicklung der Schweiz 2010–2060”, Tech. rep., Swiss Federal Office of Statistics (BFS), URL
  3. Chakravorty, Ujjayant, Bertrand Magne, and Michel Moreaux (2009), “Can Nuclear Power Supply Clean Energy in the long run? A Model with Endogenous Substitution of Resources”, Tech. rep., University of Alberta, Department of Economics.Google Scholar
  4. EFD (2008), “Long-Term Sustainability of Public Finances in Switzerland”, Tech. rep., Federal Department of Finance (EFD), URL
  5. IAEA (2011), “Climate change and nuclear power”, Tech. rep., International Atomic Energy Agency.Google Scholar
  6. IIASA (2009), “Greenhouse Gas Initiative (GGI) Scenario Database. Version 2.0”, URL
  7. Intergovernmental Panel in Climate Change (IPCC) (2007), Climate Change 2007: Mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Kypreos, Socrates (2005), “Modeling Experience Curves in MERGE (Model for Evaluating Regional and Global Effects)”, Energy, 30, pp. 2721–2737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kypreos, Socrates and Olivier Bahn (2003), “A MERGE Model with Endogenous Technological Progress”, Environmental Modeling and Assessment, 8, pp. 249–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Laufer, Fred, Stephan Grötzinger, Marco Peter, and Alain Schmutz (2004), “Ausbaupotential der Wasserkraft”, Tech. rep., Bundesamt für Energie (BFE), URL
  11. Lutz, Wolfang, Warren Sanderson, and Sergei Scherbov (2008), “The Coming Acceleration of Global Population Ageing”, Nature, 452, pp. 716–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Magne, Bertrand, Socrates Kypreos, and Hal Turton (2010), “Technology Options for Low Stabilization Pathways with MERGE”, The Energy Journal. Special Issue 1, 31, pp. 83–108.Google Scholar
  13. Manne, Alan and Leonardo Barreto (2004), “Learn-by-Doing and Carbon Dioxide Abatement”, Energy Economics, 26, pp. 621–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Manne, Alan, Robert Mendelsohn, and Richard Richels (1995), “MERGE: A Model for Evaluating Regional and Global Effects of GHG Reduction Policies”, Energy Policy, 23, pp. 17–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Marcucci, Adriana, and Hal Turton (2011), “Analyzing Energy Technology Options for Switzerland in the Face of Global Uncertainties: An Overview of the MERGE Model”, NCCR Climate Research Paper 2011/05, Paul Scherrer Institute.Google Scholar
  16. OcCC (2007), „OcCC-Empfehlungen zur Schweizerischen Klimapolitik Post 2012“, Tech. rep., The Advisory Body on Climate Change (OcCC), URL
  17. Pricewaterhousecoopers (2010), “100% Renewable Electricity. A Roadmap to 2050 for Europe and North Africa”, Tech. rep., PriceWaterHouseCoopers.Google Scholar
  18. Riahi, Keywan, Arnulf Grübler, and Nebojsa Nakicenovic (2007), “Scenarios of Long-Term Socio-Economic and Environmental Development under Climate Stabilization”, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 74 , pp. 887–935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. SATW (2007), “Roadmap Renewable Energies Switzerland: An Analysis with a View to Harnessing Existing Potentials by 2050”, Tech. rep., Swiss Academy of Engineering and Science (SATW).Google Scholar
  20. Seebregts, A., S. Bos, T. Kram, and G. Schaeffer (2000), “Endogenous Learning and Technology Clustering: Analysis with MARKAL Model of the Western European Energy System”, International Journal of Energy Issues, 14, pp. 289–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Swiss Federal Council (2011), “Federal Council Decides to Gradually Phase Out Nuclear Energy as Part of its New Energy Strategy”, Press release on 25.5.2011, URL
  22. Weidmann, Nicolas, Kannan Ramachandran, and Hal Turton (2012), “Swiss Climate Change and Nuclear Policy: A Comparative Analysis Using an Energy System Approach and a Sectoral Electricity Model”, Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics, vol. 148(2), pp. 275–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Swiss Society of Economics and Statistics 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Paul Scherrer InstituteSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations