Advertisement

Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics

, Volume 147, Issue 4, pp 397–415 | Cite as

Subjective well-being, politics and political economy

  • Bruno S. Frey
Open Access
Article
  • 70 Downloads

Keywords

Happiness well-being economic policy manipulation political economy 

JEL-Classification

A10 D70 H11 I31 

References

  1. Arndt, Christine, and Charles Oman (2008), “The Politics of Governance Ratings”, International Public Management, 11, pp. 275–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baralexis, Spyros (2004), “Creative Accounting in Small Advancing Countries: The Greek Case”, Managerial Auditing Journal, 19, pp. 440–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barrotta, Pierluigi (2008), “Why Economists Should Be Unhappy with the Economics of Happiness”, Economics and Philosophy, 24, pp. 145–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bentham, Jeremy (1789) [1996], An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation, Clarendon.Google Scholar
  5. Bok, Derek (2011), The Politics of Happiness: What Government Can Learn from the New Research on Well-Being, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Brennan, Geoffrey, and James Buchanan (1985), The Reason of Rules: Constitutional Political Economy, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bruni, Luigino (2006), Civil Happiness: Economics and Human Flourishing in Historical Perspective, Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Bruni, Luigino, and Pier Luigi Porta (eds) (2005), Economics and Happiness: Framing the Analysis, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Buchanan, James M., and Gordon Tullock (1962), The Calculus of Consent, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Campbell, Donald T. (1976), “Assessing the Impact of Planned Social Change”, occasional paper no. 8, Social Research and Public Policies, Dartmouth College, The Public Affairs Center.Google Scholar
  11. Clark, Andrew E., Ed Diener, Yannis Georgellis and Richard E. Lucas (2006), “Lags and Leads in Life Satisfaction: A Test of the Baseline Hypothesis”, Working paper, CNRS and DELTA-Fédération Jourdan.Google Scholar
  12. Dafflon, Bernard, and Sergio Rossi (1999), “Public Accounting Fudges towards EMU: A First Empirical Survey and some Public Choice Considerations”, Public Choice, 101(1–2), pp. 59–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. De Neve, Jan-Emmanuel, Nicholas A. Christakis, James H. Fowler and Bruno S. Frey (2011), “Genes, Economics and Happiness”, CREMA Working Paper Series 2010-01, CESifo Working Paper Series 2946.Google Scholar
  14. De Prycker, Valérie (2010), “Happiness on the Political Agenda? PROS and CONS”,Journal of Happiness Studies, 11, pp. 585–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Di Tella, Rafael, and Robert MacCulloch (2006), “Some Uses of Happiness Data in Economics”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20, pp. 25–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dolan, Paul, Tessa Peasgood and Mathew White (2008), “Do We Really Know What Makes Us Happy? A Review of the Economic Literature on the Factors Associated with Subjective Well-Being” Journal of Economic Psychology, 29, pp. 94–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dryzek, John (1990), Discursive Democracy: Politics, Policy and Political Science, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Dutt, Amitava K., and Benjamin Radcliff (eds) (2009), Happiness, Economics and Politics, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, USA: Elgar.Google Scholar
  19. Easterlin, Richard A. (1974), “Does Economic Growth Improve the Human Lot? Some Empirical Evidence”, in Nations and Households in Economic Growth: Essays in Honour of Moses Abramowitz, Paul A. David and Melvin W. Reder (eds), New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  20. Easterlin, Richard A. (2001), “Income and Happiness: Towards a Unified Theory”, Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, 111(473), pp. 465–84.Google Scholar
  21. Easterlin, Richard A. (2002), Happiness in Economics, Cheltenham UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Elgar.Google Scholar
  22. Easterlin, Richard A. (2004), “Explaining Happiness”, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Nations and Households in Economic Growth: Essays in Honour of Moses Abramowitz, 100, pp. 1176–1183.Google Scholar
  23. Easterlin, Richard A. (2010), Happiness, Growth, and the Life Cycle, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Eid, Michael, and Randy J. Larsen (eds) (2008), The Science of Subjective Well-Being, New York and London: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  25. Fleurbaey, M. (2009), “Beyond GDP: The Quest for a Measure of Social Welfare”, Journal of Economic Literature 47, pp. 1029–1075.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Forte, Francesco (2001), “The Maastricht ‘Excessive Deficit’ Rules and Creative Accounting”, in: Rules and Reason: Perspectives on Constitutional Political Economy, Mudambi, Ram, Pietro Navarra and Giuseppe Sobbrio (eds), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Frey, Bruno S. (2008), Happiness: A Revolution in Economics, Cambridge, MA and London, England: The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Frey, Bruno S. (2011a), “Peace, War and Happiness. Bruder Klaus as Well-Being Facilitator”, International Journal of Well-being, in press.Google Scholar
  29. Frey, Bruno S. (2011b), “Tullock Challenges: Happiness, Revolutions and Democracy”, Public Choice, in press.Google Scholar
  30. Frey, Bruno S., and Alois Stutzer (2000a), “Happiness, Economy and Institutions”, The Economic Journal, 110, pp. 918–938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Frey, Bruno S., and Alois Stutzer (2000b), “Maximizing Happiness?”, German Economic Review 1, pp. 146–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Frey, Bruno S., and Alois Stutzer (2002a), Happiness and Economics, Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Frey, Bruno S., and Alois Stutzer (2002b), “What Can Economists Learn from Happiness Research?”, Journal of Economic Literature, 40(2), pp. 402–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Frey, Bruno S., and Alois Stutzer (2004), “Reported Subjective Well-Being: A Challenge for Economic Theory and Economic Policy”, Schmollers Jahrbuch, 124, pp. 191–231.Google Scholar
  35. Frey, Bruno S., and Alois Stutzer (2005), “Happiness Research: State and Prospects”, Review of Social Economy, 62, pp. 207–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Frey, Bruno S., and Alois Stutzer (2006), “Does Marriage Make People Happy, or Do Happy People Get Married?”, The Journal of Socio-Economics, 35, pp. 326–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Frey, Bruno S., and Alois Stutzer (2008), “Economic Consequences of Mispredicting Utility”, CREMA Working Paper Series 2005-04.Google Scholar
  38. Frey, Bruno S., and Alois Stutzer (2009), “Should Happiness Be Maximized?”, in Happiness, Economics and Politics, Amitava K. Dutt and Benjamin Radcliff (eds), pp. 97–126, Cheltenham, UK, and Northampton, USA: Elgar.Google Scholar
  39. Frey, Bruno S., and Alois Stutzer (2010), “Happiness and Public Choice”, Public Choice, 144, pp. 557–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Frey, Bruno S., and Claudia Frey Marti (2011), Glück — Die Sicht der Ökonomie, Zurich and Chur: Rüegger.Google Scholar
  41. Frey, Bruno S., and Margit Osterloh (2010), “Evaluations: Hidden Costs, Questionable Benefits and Superior Alternatives”, in Professional pride — a powerful force, T. Jansen, G. van den Brink, J. Kole, The Hague, pp. 175–196.Google Scholar
  42. Frey, René (2002), Wirtschaft, Staat und Wohlfahrt. Eine Einführung in die Volkswirtschaftslehre am Beispiel der Schweiz, Basel and Frankfurt a. M.: Helbing und Lichtenhahn.Google Scholar
  43. Gibbard, Allan (1973), “Manipulation of Voting Schemes: A General Result”, Econometrica, 41(4), pp. 587–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Gilbert, Daniel (2006), Stumbling on Happiness, New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  45. Glaeser, Edward L. (2005), “Paternalism and Psychology”, NBER Working Papers 11789.Google Scholar
  46. Goodhart, Charles (1975), “Monetary Relationships: A New Form of Thread-needle street”, Papers in Monetary Economics, 1, Reserve Bank of Australia.Google Scholar
  47. Gregg, Paul (1994), “Out of the Count: A Social Scientist’s Analysis of the Unemployment Statistics in the UK”, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A 157, pp. 253–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Habermas, Jürgen (1996), Between Facts and Norms — Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy, London: Polity.Google Scholar
  49. Haybron, Daniel M. (2008), The Pursuit of Unhappiness. The Elusive Psychology of Well-Being, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Hicks, John, and Roy Allen (1934), “A Reconsideration of the Theory of Value”, Economica, 1, pp. 52–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Jacob, Brian A., and Steven D. Levitt (2003), “Rotten Apples: An Investigation of the Prevalence and Predictions of Teacher Cheating”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118, pp. 843–877.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Kahneman, Daniel, and Alan B. Krueger (2006), “Developments in the Measurement of Subjective Well-Being”, Journal of Economic Perspectives 20, pp. 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Kahneman, Daniel, Ed Diener, and Norbert Schwarz (eds) (1999), Well-Being: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology, New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  54. Koen, Vincent, and Paul Joseph Van den Noord (2005), “Fiscal Gimmickry in Europe: One-off Measures and Creative Accounting”, OECD Economic Department Working Paper No 417.Google Scholar
  55. Lane, Robert (2000), The Loss of Happiness in Market Economies, Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Layard, Richard (1980), “Human Satisfaction and Public Policy”, Economic Journal, 90, pp. 737–750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Layard, Richard (2005), Happiness: Lessons from a New Science, New York: Penguin Press.Google Scholar
  58. Lucas, Robert E. (1976), “Econometric Policy Evaluation: A Critique”, in Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy. The Phillips Curve and Labor Markets, Karl Brunner and Alan H. Meltzer (eds), pp. 19–46, New York: North Holland.Google Scholar
  59. Lyubomirsky, Sonja (2007), The How of Happiness. A Scientific Approach to Getting the Life You Want, New York: Penguin Press.Google Scholar
  60. McMahon, Darrin M. (2006), Happiness: A History, New York: Atlantic Monthly Press.Google Scholar
  61. Meyer, Marshall W. (2005), “Can Performance Studies Create Actionable Knowledge If We Can’t Measure the Performance of the Firm?”, Journal of Management Inquiry, 14(3), pp. 287–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Meyer, Marshall W., and V. Gupta (1994), “The Performance Paradox”, Research in Organisational Behaviour, 16, pp. 309–369.Google Scholar
  63. Milesi-Ferretti, Gian Maria (2004), “Good, Bad or Ugly? On the Effects of Fiscal Rules with Creative Accounting”, Journal of Public Economics, 88, pp. 377–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Morozov, Evgeny (2010), The Net Delusion. How Not to Liberate the World, London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
  65. Morgenstern, Oscar (1970), On the Accuracy of Economic Observations, 2nd ed., Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  66. Mueller, Dennis (1996), Constitutional Democracy, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  67. Nussbaum, Martha C. (2008), “Who is the Happy Warrior? Philosophy Poses Questions to Psychology”, Journal of Legal Studies, 37(S2), pp. 81–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Orwell, George (1949), Nineteen Eighty-Four, Harmondsworth: Penguin, reprinted 1990.Google Scholar
  69. Osterloh, Margit (2010), “Governance by Numbers. Does it Really Work in Research?”, Analyse und Kritik, 32, pp. 267–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Oswald, Andrew J., and Powdthavee, Nattavudh (2008), “Death, Happiness, and the Calculation of Compensatory Damages”, Journal of Legal Studies, 37, pp. 217–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Rawls, John (1971), A Theory of Justice, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  72. Robbins, Lionel (1932), An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science, Macmillan. Selections reprinted in The Philosophy of Economics: An Anthology, D. Hausman (ed.), Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  73. Satterthwaite, Mark (1975), “Strategy-Proofness and Arrow’s Conditions: Existence and Correspondence Theorems for Voting Procedures and Social Welfare Functions”, Journal of Economic Theory, 10, pp. 187–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Sen, Amartya K. (1999), Development and Freedom, New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  75. Stadelmann-Steffen, Isabelle, and Adrian Vatter (2011), “Does Satisfaction with Democracy Really Increase Happiness? Direct Democracy and Individual Satisfaction in Switzerland”, Political Behavior, published online 10 May 2011.Google Scholar
  76. Stiglitz, Joseph E., Amartya Sen and Jean-Paul Fitoussi (2009), Report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress, http:/www.stiglitz-sen-fitoussi.fr.
  77. Sugden, Robert, and Joshua Chen-Yuang Teng (2008), “Is Happiness a Matter for Governments? A Millian Perspective on Layard’s ‘new science’”, Mimeo, School of Economics, University of East Anglia.Google Scholar
  78. Sunstein, Cass R. (2006), Infotopia — How Many Minds Produce Knowledge, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  79. Thaler, Richard H., and Cass R. Sunstein (2008), Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  80. Theil, Henry (1964), Optimal Decision Rules for Government and Industry, North-Holland.Google Scholar
  81. Tinbergen, Jan (1956), Economic Policy: Principles and Design, New York: North-Holland.Google Scholar
  82. UNDP (1999), Human Development Report, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  83. Ura, Karma, and Karma Galay (eds) (2004), Gross National Happiness and Development, Centre for Bhutan Studies, Bhutan.Google Scholar
  84. Veenhoven, Ruut (1989), Conditions of Happiness, Dordrecht and Boston: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
  85. Von Hagen, Jürgen, and Guntram B. Wolff (2006), “What Do Deficits Tell Us about Debt? Empirical evidence on Creative Accounting with Fiscal Rules in the EU”, Discussion Papers 148, SFB/TR 15 Governance and the Efficiency of Economic Systems, Free University of Berlin, Humboldt University of Berlin, University of Bonn, University of Mannheim, University of Munich.Google Scholar
  86. Vournas, Yorgos (1999), “Official Statistics and the Manipulation of Conceptual and Technical Instruments: Implications for Research on Social Security”, Radical Statistics, 72.Google Scholar
  87. Webster, David (2002), “Unemployment. How Official Statistics Distort Analysis and Policy and Why”, Radical Statistics, 79/80.Google Scholar
  88. Wolff, Hendrik, Howard Chong and Maximilian Auffhammer (2011), “Classification, Detection and Consequences of Data Error: Evidence from the Human Development Index”, Economic Journal, 121, pp. 843–870.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Swiss Society of Economics and Statistics 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsUniversity of ZurichZurichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations