Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics

, Volume 144, Issue 4, pp 631–654 | Cite as

Valuation of Environmental Goods in Profit and Non-Profit Housing Sectors: Evidence from the Rental Market in the City of Zurich

  • Silvia Banfi
  • Massimo Filippini
  • Andrea Horehájová
Open Access


This paper analyses the impact of electromagnetic pollution, noise and air pollution on the rent level for the aggregated and disaggregated market in the city of Zurich, Switzerland. Although there is no conclusive assessment about the health impacts of electromagnetic radiation people are nonetheless concerned about possible long term risks associated with the exposure. This risk perception may affect the price of dwellings located close to antenna. The regression results show that the environmental variables considered have the expected sign and are highly significant, with exception of the presence of an antenna and the air pollution for the non-profit submarket. However, the greatest part of the variation is explained by the structural variables.


hedonic pricing electrosmog noise air pollution market segmentation 


C21 Q2 R31 


  1. Adair, A. S., J. N. Berry and W. S. McGreal (1996), “Hedonic Modelling, Housing Submarkets and Residential Valuation”, Journal of Property Research, vol. 13(1), pp. 67–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahlbom, Anders, Elisabeth Cardis, Adele Green, Martha Linet, David Savitz and Anthony Swerdlow (2001), “Review of the Epidemiologic Literature on EMF and health”, Environmental Health Perspectives, 109 (Supplement 6), pp. 911–933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anselin, Luc, and Anil K. Bera (1998), “Spatial Dependence in Linear Regression Models with an Introduction to Spatial Econometrics”, in Ullah, A. and Giles (eds), Handbook of Applied Economic Statistics, pp. 237–289.Google Scholar
  4. Banfi, Silvia, Massimo Filippini, Andrea Horehájová and Daniela Pióro (2007), „Zahlungsbereitschaft für eine verbesserte Umweltqualität am Wohnort — Schätzungen für die Städte Zürich und Lugano für die Bereiche Luftverschmutzung, Lärmbelastung und Elektrosmog von Mobilfunkantenne“, Zürich.Google Scholar
  5. Baranzini, Andrea, and José V. Ramirez (2005), “Paying for Quietness: The Impact of Noise on Geneva Rents”, Urban Studies, vol. 42(4), pp. 633–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baranzini, Andrea, Caroline Schaerer, José V. Ramirez and Philippe Thalmann (2006), “Feel It or Measure It — Perceived vs. Measured Noise in Hedonic Models’” Haute école de gestion de Genève, Available at SSRN:
  7. Bjørner, Thomas B., Jacob Kronbak and Thomas Lundhede (2003), “Valuation of Noise Reduction — Comparing Results from Hedonic Pricing and Contingent Valuation”, AKF, Institute of Local Government Studies, Denmark.Google Scholar
  8. Bourassa, Steven C., Foort Hamelink, Martin Hoesli and Bryan D. MacGregor (1999), “Defining Housing Submarkets”, Journal of Housing Economics, vol. 8(2), pp. 160–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bourassa, Steven C., Martin Hoesli and Vincent S. Peng (2003), “Do Housing Submarkets Really Matter?”, Journal of Housing Economic, vol. 12(1), pp. 12–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Breckenkamp, Jürgen, Gabriele Berg and Maria Blettner (2003), “Biological Effects on Human Health Due to Radiofrequency/Microwave Exposure: A Synopsis of Cohort Studies”, Radiation and Environmental Biophysics, 42, pp. 141–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Champ, Patricia A., Kevin J. Boyle and Thomas C. Brown (eds) (2004), “A Primer on Nonmarket Valuation”, The Economics of Non-Market Goods and Resources, 3, Netherlands.Google Scholar
  12. Chattopadhyay, Supid (1999), “Estimating the Demand for Air Quality: New Evidence Based on the Chicago Housing Market”, Land Economics, 75, pp. 22–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Court, Andrew T. (1939), “Hedonic Price Indexes with Automobile Examples”, in The Dynamics of Automobile Demand, New York, pp. 99–117.Google Scholar
  14. Dale-Johnson, David (1982), “An Alternative Approach to Housing Market Segmentation Using Hedonic Price Data”, Journal of Urban Economics, 11(3), pp. 311–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Des Rosiers, Francois (2002), “Power Lines, Visual Encumbrance and House Values: A Microspatial Approach to Impact Measurement”, Journal of Real Estate Research, 23 (3), pp. 275–301.Google Scholar
  16. Forrest, David (1991), “An Analysis of House Price Differentials between English Regions”, Regional Studies, 25 (3), pp. 231–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gerheuser, F. W. (1999), „Mietpreis-Strukturerhebung 1996”, Swiss Federal Statistical Office, Bulletin 271-9600, Neuchâtel.Google Scholar
  18. Green, William H. (2008), “Econometric Analysis”, 6th ed., New Jersey.Google Scholar
  19. Griliches, Zvi (1961), “Price Indexes and Quality Change”, Studies in New Methods of Measurement, for the Price Statistics Committee, Federal Reserve Board, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  20. Hamilton, Stanley W., and Gregory M. Schwann (1995), “Do High Voltage Electric Transmission Lines Affect Property Value?”, Land Economics, 71 (4), pp. 436–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kemeny, Jim, Jan Kersloot and Philippe Thalmann (2005), “Non-Profit Housing Influencing, Leading and Dominating the Unitary Rental Market: Three Case Studies”, Housing Studies, 20(6), pp. 855–872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kim, Chong Won, Tim T. Phipps and Luc Anselin (2003), “Measuring the Benefits of Air Quality Improvement: A Spatial Hedonic Approach”, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 45, pp. 24–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Michaels, Gregory R., and Kerry V. Smith (1990), “Market Segmentation and Valuing Amenities with Hedonic Models: The Case of Hazardous Waste Sites”, Journal of Urban Economics, 28, pp. 223–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Navrud, Stale (2002), “The State-of-the-Art on Economic Valuation of Noise”, Final Report to European Commission DG Environment, Department of Economics and Social Sciences, Agricultural University of Norway.Google Scholar
  25. Nelson, Jon P. (2008), “Hedonic Property Value Studies of Transportation Noise: Aircraft and Road Traffic”, in Baranzini, A., J. Ramirez, C. Schaerer and P. Thalmann (Eds), Hedonic Methods in Housing Markets. Pricing Environmental Amenities and Segregation, New York.Google Scholar
  26. Palm, Risa (1978), “Spatial Segmentation of the Urban Housing Market”, Economic Geography, 54(3), pp. 210–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rossi, Angelo A. (2007), “The Housing Market in Zurich’s Urban Agglomeration”, in European Metropolitan Housing Markets, pp. 145–164, Berlin.Google Scholar
  28. Röösli, Martin, Anke Huss and Nadja Schreier (2005), „Repräsentative Befragung zu Sorgen und gesundheitlichen Beschwerden im Zusammenhang mit elektromagnetischen Feldern in der Schweiz“, Universität Bern.Google Scholar
  29. Schaerer, Caroline, Andrea Baranzini, José V. Ramirez and Philippe Thalmann (2008), “Using the Hedonic Approach to Value Natural Land Uses in an Urban Area: An Application to Geneva and Zurich”, Economie Publique/Public Economics, 20(2007/1), pp. 147–167.Google Scholar
  30. Schmid, Peter (2005), „Die Wohnbaugenossenschaften der Schweiz“, unveröffentlichte Masterarbeit am VMI der Universität Freiburg.Google Scholar
  31. Schnare, Ann B., and Raymond J. Struyk (1976), “Segmentation in Urban Housing Markets”, Journal of Urban Economics, 3, pp. 146–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Siegrist, Michael, Timothy C. Earle and Heinz Gutscher (2003), “Test of a Trust and Confidence Model in the Applied Context of Electromagnetic Field (EMF) Risks”, Risk Analysis, 23, pp. 705–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Siegrist, Michael, Timothy C. Earle, Heinz Gutscher and Carmen Keller (2005), “Perception of Mobile Phone and Base Station Risks”, Risk Analysis, 25(5), pp. 1253–1264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Thalmann, Philippe (1987), «Explication empirique des loyers lausannois», Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics, 129, pp. 123, 47–70.Google Scholar
  35. Thalmann, Philippe (1993), “How Expensive is Appropriate Housing?”, Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics, 129, pp. 23–38.Google Scholar
  36. Thalmann, Philippe (2003), “ ‘House Poor’ or Simply ‘Poor’?”, Journal of Housing Economics, 12, pp. 291–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Watkins, Craig A. (2001), “The Definition and Identification of Housing Sub-markets”, Environmental and Planning A, 33, pp. 2235–2253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Zabel, Jeffrey E., and Katherine A. Kiel (2000), “Estimating the Demand for Air Quality in Four U.S. Cities”, Land Economics, 76 (2), pp. 174–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Silvia Banfi
    • 1
  • Massimo Filippini
    • 1
    • 2
  • Andrea Horehájová
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Energy Policy and Economics (CEPE)Swiss Federal Institute of TechnologyZürichSwitzerland
  2. 2.Istituto di microeconomia e economia PubblicaUniversità della Svizzera italianaLuganoSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations