Skip to main content
Log in

Artisan or Genius: Two Views of Poetic Process

  • Article
  • Published:
Journal of Poetry Therapy

Abstract

Historically there have been two ways of conceptualizing the process of writing poems: one “object-centered” and the other “process-centered.” Etymology of terms for poetry reflects these historical understandings, and the ideas can be traced through many cultures. Although interactive in the actual practice of poets, the two notions are theoretically incompatible. These two ways of thinking about poetic process determine the individual’s definition of and criteria for good poetry. Implications of these theories for the poetry therapist include necessary theoretical foundation, progress toward a definition of poetry, understanding of clients’ reactions to poems and poetry-writing, possible understanding of suicide of certain poets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baraka, A. (1979). Selected poetry of Amiri Baraka/Le Roi Jones. New York: Morrow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berryman, J. (1969). The dream songs. New York: Farrar, Straus, Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleridge, S. (1971). Selected poetry and prose. San Francisco: Rinehart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake, W. (1970). The poetry and prose of William Blake. Garden City: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogan, L. (1977). The blue estuaries. New York: The Ecco Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, J. (1960). The exclusions of a rhyme. Denver: Alan Swallow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson, E. (1955). Poems. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferlinghetti, L. (1981). Endless life: Selected poems. New York: New Directions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finnegan, R. (1977). Oral poetry. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginsberg, A. (1984). Collected poems, 1947–1980. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horace. (1975). The poetic art. Cheadle (England): Carcanet Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kappel, A. J. (1985). Psychiatrists, Paranoia, and the Mind of Ezra Pound. Literature and Medicine, 4, 70–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keats, J. (1951). Complete poetry and selected prose. New York: Modern Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxford English dictionary. (1971). Compact Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Plath, S. (1981). The collected poems. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plato. (1965). The republic. Cambridge (England): University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pound. E. (1972). The cantos of Ezra Pound. New York: New Directions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sexton, A. (1974). The death notebooks. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shakespeare, W. (1969). The complete works. Baltimore: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sidney, Sir Philip. (1965). The prose works. Cambridge (England): Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Very, J. (1966). Selected poems. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitman, W. (1973). Leaves of grass. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolf, V. (1977). The diary of Virginia Woolf. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolf, V. (1975). The letters of Virginia Woolf. London: Hogarth Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeats, W. (1966). A vision. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jaskoski, H. Artisan or Genius: Two Views of Poetic Process. J Poetry Ther 1, 5–13 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03391264

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03391264

Navigation