Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of Techniques in a Study of Zinc Self-Diffusion

  • Transactions
  • Published:
JOM Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Self-diffusion in zinc has been used as an instrument for comparison of the absorption and sectioning techniques as a means of studying diffusion. Single crystal as well as poly-crystal samples were used and the temperature range of diffusion extended from 200° to 415°C. For temperatures above 200°C, the data indicate that the results obtained from the absorption technique agree with those obtained from the sectioning technique. The effect on the values of the diffusion coefficient of electroplating vs evaporation as a means of applying the tracer was investigated and no significant difference observed. It was found that an excess or deficiency of tracer did not materially affect the results obtained from the sectioning technique, but invariably caused errors with the absorption technique.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. G. A. Shirn, E. S. Wadja, and H. D. Huntingdon: Acta Metallurgica (1951) 1, p. 513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. P. H. Miller and F. L. Banks: Physical Review (1942) 61, p. 648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. A. M. Sagrubskij: Bulletin Academy of Science, USSR (1937) p. 903. Physical Series.

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. C. McKay: Trans. Faraday Soc. (1918) 34, p. 845.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. L. Slifkin, D. Lazarus, and T. Tomizuka: Journal of Applied Physics (1952) 23, p. 1032.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. W. A. Johnson: Trans. AIME (1941) 143, p. 107; Metals Technology (January 1941).

    Google Scholar 

  7. R. E. Hoffman and D. Turnbull: Journal of Applied Physics (1951) 22, p. 634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. A. D. Martin, R. D. Johnson, and F. Asaro: Journal of Applied Physics (1954) 25, p. 364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. M. S. Maier and H. R. Nelson: Trans. AIME (1942) 147, p. 39; Metals Technology (January 1942).

    Google Scholar 

  10. C. L. Raynor, L. Thomassen, and L. J. Rouse: Trans. ASM (1942) 30, p. 313.

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. Steigman, W. Shockley, and Nix: Physical Review (1939) 25, p. 605. See for derivation of Eq. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  12. A. E. Berkowitz. F. E. Jaumot, Jr., and F. C. Nix: Physical Review (1954) 95, p. 1185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. F. C. Nix and F. E. Jaumot, Jr.: Physical Review (1951) 82, p. 72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. A. E. Berkowitz: Journal of Applied Physics (1955) 26, p. 403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. J. E. Perkins and S. K. Hagrees: Physical Review (1953) 92, p. 686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. T. Liu and H. G. Drickamer: Journal of Chemical Physics (1954) 22, No. 2, p. 312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. R. E. Carter and F. O. Richardson: Trans. AIME (1954) 200, p. 1244; Journal of Metals (November 1954).

    Google Scholar 

  18. L. Himmel, R. F. Mehl, and C. E. Birchenall: Trans. AIME (1953); 197, p. 827; Journal of Metals (June 1953).

    Google Scholar 

  19. C. E. Birchenall: Private communication.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Discussion of this paper, TP 4138E, may be sent, 2 copies, to AIME by Apr. 1, 1956. Manuscript, Dec. 21, 1954.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jaumot, F.E., Smith, R.L. Comparison of Techniques in a Study of Zinc Self-Diffusion. JOM 8, 137–142 (1956). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03377658

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03377658

Navigation