Advertisement

Historical Archaeology

, Volume 10, Issue 1, pp 17–27 | Cite as

The interpretive potential of glass trade beads in historic archæology

  • Janet D. Spector
Article

Abstract

Glass trade beads, because of their frequency of occurrence at historic sites, and because of the culturally prescribed manner in which they were utilized by Indian groups, should be an artifact type with considerable temporal and cultural interpretive potential in historic archæology. Two approaches, ethnohistoric and archæological, are advocated here as means of maximizing the interpretive potential of beads. Both approaches can contribute to the formalization of descriptive methods as an initial step in the analysis of beads, rendering bead samples from different sites comparable. In the following pages an exploration of both the ethnohistoric and archæological approaches is presented in an effort to demonstrate the potential of trade beads in historic sites archæology and to stimulate more intensive and extensive trade bead research.

Keywords

Historic Site Molten Glass Surface Decoration Artifact Type Bead Type 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. American Fur Company Papers, The n.d. On microfilm, State Historical Society of Wisconsin.Google Scholar
  2. Cleland, Charles E. 1972 The Matthews site (20CL61), Clinton County, Michigan. The Michigan Arch æologist, Vol. 18, No. 4, December, pp. 175–208.Google Scholar
  3. Good, Mary Elizabeth 1972 The Guebert site: an 18th century historic Kaskaskia indian village in Randolph County, Illinois. Memoir II, The Central States Archæological Societies, Inc.Google Scholar
  4. Kidd, Kenneth E. and Martha Ann 1970 A classification system for glass beads for the use of field archæologists. Canadian Historic Sites: Occasional Papers in Archæology and History, No. 1, pp. 46–89.Google Scholar
  5. Spector, Janet D. 1974 Winnebago Indians, 1634–1829: an archeological and ethnohistoric investigation. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Wisconsin, published on demand by University Microfilms, a Xerox Company.Google Scholar
  6. Stone, Lyle 1970 Archæological research at Fort Michilimackinac, an eighteenth century historic site in Emmett County, Michigan: 1959–1966 excavations. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Michigan State University, published on demand by University Microfilms, a Xerox Company, Vols. I and II.Google Scholar
  7. Woodward, Arthur 1965 Indian Trade Goods, Oregon Archæological Society.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Historical Archaeology 1978

Authors and Affiliations

  • Janet D. Spector
    • 1
  1. 1.University of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA

Personalised recommendations