Crime in the streets — A moral panic: Understanding “get tough” policies in the criminal justice system
- 67 Downloads
There is more to the crisis of violent crime in the streets than simply citizens being increasingly victimized, becoming alarmed and demanding that public officials do something about it. The. fear of crime, a central theme in diologue surrounding the movement toward “tough on crime” legislation, may exceed by far the actual threat which exists. preliminary eviddnce suggests that indeed a “moral panic” has developed around violent crime in the united States — a “panic” which cannot be explained by dramatic increases in the crime rate. A social structural explanation is required if this lack of fit between the fear of crime and the crime rate is to be understood.
KeywordsCriminal Justice Criminal Justice System Crime Rate Violent Crime Victimization Survey
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Baab, C. Columbia has no crime wave—it’s more like a tide. The Columbia Record. May 4, 1981, pp. 1A; 12A.Google Scholar
- Burger urges plan of ‘damage control’ to end cities’ crime. The New York Times. February 9, 1981, pp. 1; 11.Google Scholar
- Federal Bureau of Investigation. Uniform crime reports. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1970–79.Google Scholar
- Herring, M. Guns, dogs, mace, alarms—Columbians seek safety. The Columbia Record. May 5, 1981, pp. 1A; 10A.Google Scholar
- Man, woman sought in shooting incident. The Columbia Record. May 1, 1981, p. 5B.Google Scholar
- Pair sentenced to life terms for burglary. The Columbia Record. April 19, 1981, p. 4B.Google Scholar
- The curse of violent crime. Time. March 23, 1981, pp. 16–21.Google Scholar
- The plague of violent crime. Newsweek. March 23, 1981, pp. 46–54.Google Scholar
- U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics. Criminal victimization in the U.S. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1980.Google Scholar
- Violent crime on the rise. South Carolina Law Enforcement Officers Association Magazine. March–April 1981, p. 5.Google Scholar