Advertisement

Unternehmensethik als Gegenstand betriebswirtschaftlicher Forschung und Lehre–Eine Bestandsaufnahme aus internationaler Perspektive

  • Dirk Matten
  • Guido Palazzo
Unternehmensethik und CSR

Zusammenfassung

Der vorliegende Beitrag bietet einen Überblick über den Status Quo in der unternehmensethischen Forschung und Lehre im internationalen Bereich. Nach einer kurzen Begriffsklärung werden zunächst Entwicklung und Strukturen des Faches skizziert. Alsdann analysiert der Beitrag bedeutende Forschungsrichtungen des Feldes und beschreibt den Stellenwert von Unternehmensethik in der weltweiten Managementausbildung. Darüber hinaus werden wesentliche Zukunftstrends in der inhaltlichen Entwicklung des Faches aufgezeigt. Der Beitrag schließt mit einigen vergleichenden Bemerkungen über die Bedeutung des Feldes im deutschsprachigen Raum und wagt einen abschließenden Ausblick.

Abstract

This paper attempts at providing an overview over the international debate in business ethics (and related concepts). It addresses some of the labels and concepts of the field internationally before providing an overview over the development of the field and its key structural elements. It then moves on to adumbrate key areas of research and sketches out the current state-of-the-art in the teaching of business ethics. Finally, the paper ventures a foray into key ongoing developments in the field and offers some comments on the current state of affairs in business ethics in the German speaking countries. The remarks close with some comments on the future of business ethics teaching and research.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literaturverzeichnis

  1. Albach, Horst (2005), Betriebswirtschaftslehre ohne Unternehmensethik!, in: Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft, 75. Jg., S. 809–831.Google Scholar
  2. Albach, Horst (2007), Unternehmenstheorie und Unternehmensethik, in: Schwalbach, Joachim/ Fandel, Günter (Hrsg.), Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft, Special Issue 1/2007, Der Ehrbare Kaufmann: Modernes Leitbild für Unternehmen?, S. 1–13.Google Scholar
  3. Alvesson, Mats/ Willmott, Hugh (1992), Critical theory and management studies: An introduction, in: Alvesson, Mats/ Willmott, Hugh (Hrsg.), Critical management studies, London, S. 1–20.Google Scholar
  4. Bacharach, Samuel B. (1989), Organizational theories: Some criteria for evaluation, in: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 14, S. 495–515.Google Scholar
  5. Banerjee, Subhabrata Bobby (2003), The practice of stakeholder colonialism: National interest and colonial discourses in the management of indigenous stakeholders, in: Prasad, A. (Hrsg.), Postcolonial theory and organizational analysis, New York, S. 255–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barnett, Michael L./ Salomon, Robert M. (2006), Beyond dichotomy: the curvilinear relationship between social responsibility and financial performance, in: Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 27, S. 1101–1122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bass, Bernard M./ Steidlmeier, Paul (1999), Ethics, character, and authentic transformational leadership behavior, in: Leadership Quarterly, Vol. 10, S. 181–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Basu, Kunal/ Palazzo, Guido (2008), Corporate Social Responsibility: A process model of sensemaking, in: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 33, S. 122–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bhattacharya, C.B./ Sen, Sankar (2003), Consumer-Company Identification: A Framework for Understanding Consumers’ Relationships with Companies’, in: Journal of Marketing, Vol. 67, S. 76–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Birch, David/ Moon, Jeremy (2004), Corporate social responsibility in Asia, in: Journal of Corporate Citizenship, Special Issue, S. 18–149.Google Scholar
  11. Boje, David M./ Dennehy, Robert F. (1993), Managing in the postmodern world, Dubuque, Iowa.Google Scholar
  12. Bowen, Howard R (1953), Social Responsibilities of the Businessman, New York.Google Scholar
  13. Bowie, Norman E. (1999), Business ethics: A Kantian perspective, Oxford.Google Scholar
  14. Braithwaite, John/ Drahos, Peter (2000), Global Business Regulation, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  15. Brickson, Shelley L. (2007), Organizational identity orientation: The genesis of the role of the firm and distinct forms of social value, in: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 32, S. 864–887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Brief, Arthur P./ Buttram, Robert T./ Dukerich, Janet M. (2000), Collective corruption in the corporate world: Toward a process model, in: Turner, Marlene E. (Hrsg.), Groups at Work: Advances in Theory and Research, Hillsdale, NJ.Google Scholar
  17. Brown, Michael E./ Trevino, Linda K. (2006), Ethical leadership: A review and future directions, in: Leadership Quarterly, Vol. 17, S. 595–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Brown, Michael E./ Treviño, Linda K./ Harrison, David A. (2005), Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing, in: Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 97, S. 117–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Campbell, John L. (2006), Institutional Analysis and the Paradox of Corporate Social Responsibility, in: American Behavioral Scientist, Vol. 49, S. 925–938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cannon, Tom (1994), Corporate responsibility, London.Google Scholar
  21. Carroll, Archie B. (1991), The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders, in: Business Horizons, Vol. 34, S. 39–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Carroll, Archie B. (1999), Corporate social responsibility–evolution of a definitional construct, in: Business & Society, Vol. 38, S. 268–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Carroll, Archie B./ Buchholtz, Ann K. (2006), Business & society: ethics and stakeholder management, 6. Aufl., Mason, Ohio.Google Scholar
  24. Chapple, Wendy/ Moon, Jeremy (2005), Corporate Social Responsibility in Asia: A Seven Country Study of CSR Website Reporting, in: Business and Society, Vol. 44, S. 415–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Clapham, Andrew (2006), Human rights obligations of non-state actors, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Collins, Denis/ Wartick, Steven L (1995), Business and society/business ethics courses, in: Business & Society, Vol. 34, S. 51–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Crane, Andrew/ Matten, Dirk (2004), Questioning the Domain of the Business Ethics Curriculum, in: Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 54, S. 357–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Crane, Andrew/ Matten, Dirk (2007), Business ethics. Managing corporate citizenship and sustainability in the age of globalization, 2. Aufl., Oxford.Google Scholar
  29. Crane, Andrew/ Matten, Dirk/ Moon, Jeremy (2008), Corporations and Citizenship, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Crane, Andrew/ McWilliams, Abagail/ Matten, Dirk/ Moon, Jeremy/ Siegel, Donald (Hrsg.) (2008), The Oxford Handbook of CSR, Oxford.Google Scholar
  31. Den Hond, Frank/ De Bakker, Frank G. A. (2007), Deologically motivated activism: How activist groups influence corporate social change activities, in: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 32, S. 901–924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. DiMaggio, Paul J./ Powell, Walter W. (1983), The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields, in: American Sociological Review, Vol. 48, S. 147–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Donaldson, Lex (1996), For positivist organization theory, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Donaldson, Thomas (2003), Editor’s comments: taking ethics seriously–A mission now more possible, in: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 28, S. 363–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Donaldson, Thomas/ Dunfee, Thomas W. (1994), Toward a unified conception of business ethics: Integrative social contracts theory, in: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 19, S. 252–284.Google Scholar
  36. Dryzek, John S. (1999), Transnational democracy, in: Journal of Political Philosophy, Vol. 7, S. 30–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Dunfee, Thomas W./ Hess, David (2007), The Kasky-Nike threat to corporate social reporting, in: Business Ethics Quarterly, Vol. 17, S. 5–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ferraro, Fabrizio/ Pfeffer, Jeffrey/ Sutton, Robert I. (2005), Economic language and assumptions: How theories can become self-fulfilling, in: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 30, S. 8–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Freeman, R Edward (1984), Strategic management. A stakeholder approach, Boston.Google Scholar
  40. Friedman, Milton (1962), Capitalism and freedom, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
  41. Frooman, Jeff (1999), Stakeholder influence strategies, in: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 24, S. 191–205.Google Scholar
  42. Frynas, Jedrzej George (2005), The false developmental promise of Corporate Social Responsibility: evidence from multinational oil companies, in: International Affairs, Vol. 81, S. 581–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Fung, Archon (2003), Deliberative democracy and international labor standards, in: Governance: an International Journal of Policy and Administration, Vol. 16, Nr. 1, S. 51–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Gardberg, Naomi A./ Fombrun, Charles J. (2006), Corporate citizenship: Creating intangible assets across institutional environments, in: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 31, S. 329–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Garriga, Elisabet/ Melé, Domènec (2004), Corporate Social Responsibility Theories: Mapping the Territory, in: Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 53, S. 51–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ghoshal, Sumantra (2003), Business schools share the blame for ENRON: Teaching brutal theories leads naturally to management brutality, in: Business Ethics, Vol. 17, S. 4.Google Scholar
  47. Ghoshal, Sumantra (2005), Bad management theories are destroying good management practices, in: Academy of Management Learning and Education, Vol. 4, S. 75–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Habisch, Andre/ Jonker, Jan/ Wegner, Martina/ Schmidpeter, René (Hrsg.) (2004), CSR across Europe, Berlin.Google Scholar
  49. Handy, Charles (2002), What’s a business for?, in: Harvard Business Review, Vol. 80, S. 49–56.Google Scholar
  50. Hart, Stuart L. (1997), Beyond greening: strategies for a sustainable world, in: Harvard Business Review, Vol. 75, S. 67–76.Google Scholar
  51. Hart, Stuart L. (2005), Capitalism at the crossroads: the unlimited business opportunities in solving the world’s most difficult problems, Upper Saddle River, N.J.Google Scholar
  52. Haslam, Paul Alexander (2008), The Corporate Social Responsibility System in Latin America and the Caribbean, in: Crane, Andrew/ Matten, Dirk (Hrsg.), Corporate Social Responsibility–Sage Library in Business and Management, Vol. 3, London, in Druck.Google Scholar
  53. Jawahar, I. M./ McLaughlin, Gary L. (2001), Toward a descriptive stakeholder theory: An organizational life cycle approach, in: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 26, S. 397–414.Google Scholar
  54. Jones Christensen, Lisa/ Peirce, Ellen/ Hartman, Laura P./ Hoffman, W. Michael/ Carrier, Jamie (2007), Ethics, CSR, and Sustainability Education in the Financial Times Top 50 Global Business Schools: Baseline Data and Future Research Directions, in: Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 73, S. 347–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Kinley, David/ Chambers, Rachel (2006), The UN Human Rights Norms for Corporations: The Private Implications of International Law, in: Human Rights Law Review, Vol. 6, S. 447–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Kobrin, Stephen J. (2001), Sovereignty @bay: globalization, multinational enterprise, and the international political system, in: Rugman, A. M./ Brewer, Thomas (Hrsg.), The Oxford handbook of international business, Oxford, S. 181–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Koehn, Daryl (2005), Transforming our Students: Teaching Business Ethics Post Enron, in: Business Ethics Quarterly, Vol. 15, S. 137–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Koenig-Archibugi, Mathias (2002), Transnational Corporations and Public Accountability, in: Government and Opposition, Vol. 39, S. 234–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Kotler, Philip/ Lee, Nancy (2004), Corporate Social Responsibility: Doing the Most Good for Your Company and Your Cause, Hoboken.Google Scholar
  60. Küpper, Hans-Ulrich (2006), Unternehmensethik, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
  61. Levy, David (2008), Political contestation in global production networks, in: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 33, in DruckGoogle Scholar
  62. Lichtenstein, Nelson (Hrg.) (2006), Wal-Mart. The face of twenty-first century capitalism, New York.Google Scholar
  63. Livesey, Sharon M. (2001), Eco-identity as discursive struggle: Royal Dutch/Shell, Brent Spar, and Nigeria, in: Journal of Business Communication, Vol. 38, S. 58–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Lockett, A./ Moon, J./ Visser, W. (2006), Corporate Social Responsibility in Management Research: Focus, Nature, Salience and Sources of Influence, in: Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 43, S. 115–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Lopez, Yvette P./ Rechner, Paula L./ Olson-Buchanan, Julie B. (2005), Shaping ethical perceptions: An empirical assessment of the influence of business education, culture, and demographic factors, in: Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 60, S. 341–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Mahoney, John (1990), Teaching business ethics in the UK, Europe, and the USA: a comparative study, London; Atlantic Highlands, NJ.Google Scholar
  67. Margolis, Joshua Daniel/ Walsh, James P. (2001), People and profits? The search for a link between a company’s social and financial performance, Mahwah, NJ.Google Scholar
  68. Margolis, Joshua Daniel/ Walsh, James P. (2003), Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business, in: Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 48, S. 268–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Matten, Dirk/ Crane, Andrew (2005), Corporate citizenship: toward an extended theoretical conceptualization, in: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 30, S. 166–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Matten, Dirk/ Moon, Jeremy (2004), Corporate Social Responsibility Education in Europe, in: Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 54, S. 323–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Matten, Dirk/ Moon, Jeremy (2008), ‘Implicit’ and ‘Explicit’ CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility, in: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 33, in Druck.Google Scholar
  72. Messick, David M./ Bazerman, Max H. (1996), Ethical Leadership and the Psychology of Decision Making, in: Sloan Management Review, Vol. 37, S. 9–22.Google Scholar
  73. Midttun, Atle/ Gautesen, Kristian/ Gjølberg, Maria (2006), The political economy of CSR in Western Europe, in: Corporate Governance: the International Journal of Business in Society, Vol. 6, S. 369–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Mintzberg, Henry (1983), The Case For Corporate Social Responsibility, in: Journal of Business Strategy, Vol. 4, S. 3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Mintzberg, Henry (2004), Managers Not MBAs. A Hard Look at the Soft Practice of Managing and Management Development, London et al.Google Scholar
  76. Mintzberg, Henry/ Simons, Robert/ Basu, Kunal (2002), Beyond Selfishness, in: MIT Sloan Management Review, Vol. 44, S. 67–74.Google Scholar
  77. Misangyi, Vilmos F./ Weaver, Gary R./ Elms, Heather (2008), Ending corruption: The interplay between institutional logics, resources, and institutional entrepreneurs, in: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 33, in Druck.Google Scholar
  78. Moore, Don A./ Tetlock, Philip E./ Tanlu, Lloyd/ Bazerman, Max H. (2006), Conflicts of interest and the case of auditor independence: Moral seduction and strategic issue cycling, in: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 31, S. 10–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Orlitzky, Mark/ Schmidt, Frank L./ Rynes, Sara L. (2003), Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis, in: Organization Studies, Vol. 24, S. 403–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Palazzo, Bettina (2000), Interkulturelle Unternehmensethik. Deutsche und Amerikanische Ansätze im Vergleich, Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
  81. Palazzo, Bettina (2002), U.S.-American and German business ethics: an intercultural comparison, in: Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 41, S. 195–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Palazzo, Guido/ Basu, Kunal (2007), The Ethical Backlash of Corporate Branding, in: Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 73, S. 333–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Palazzo, Guido/ Scherer, Andreas (2006), Corporate Legitimacy as Deliberation: A Communicative Framework, in: Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 66, S. 71–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Phillips, Robert (2003), Stakeholder Theory and Organizational Ethics, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  85. Phillips, Robert/ Freeman, R Edward/ Wicks, Andrew C (2003), What stakeholder theory is not, in: Business Ethics Quarterly, 13. Jg., S. 479–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Popper, Karl Raimund (1959), The logic of scientific discovery, New York.Google Scholar
  87. Porter, Michael E./ Kramer, M R (2002), The competitve advantage of corporate philanthropy, in: Harvard Business Review, Vol. 80, S. 56–69.Google Scholar
  88. Porter, Michael E./ Kramer, Mark R. (2006), Strategy & Society: The Link Between Competitive Advantage and Corporate Social Responsibility, in: Harvard Business Review, Vol. 84, S. 78–92.Google Scholar
  89. Prahalad, Coimbatore Krishnarao (2005), The fortune at the bottom of the pyramid, Upper Saddle River, NJ.Google Scholar
  90. Prahalad, Coimbatore Krishnarao/ Hammond, Allen (2002), Serving the world’s poor, profitably, in: Harvard Business Review, Vol. 80, S. 48–57.Google Scholar
  91. Puppim de Oliveira, Jose Antonio/ Vargas, Getulio (2006), Corporate Citizenship in Latin America: New Challenges for Business, in: Journal of Corporate Citizenship, Nr. 21, Special Issue.Google Scholar
  92. Rossouw, Gedeon (2005), Business Ethics and Corporate Governance in Africa, in: Business & Society, Vol. 44, S. 94–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Rowley, Timothy I./ Moldoveanu, Mihnea (2003), When will stakeholder groups act? An interest- and identity-based model of stakeholder group mobilization, in: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 28, S. 204–219.Google Scholar
  94. Ruggie, John Gerard (2004), Reconstituting the public domain - issues, actors, and practices, in: European Journal of International Relations, 10. Jg., S. 499–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Scherer, Andreas Georg/ Palazzo, Guido (2007), Toward a political conception of corporate responsibility–business and society seen from a Habermasian perspective, in: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 32, S. 1096–1120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Scherer, Andreas Georg/ Palazzo, Guido (Hrsg.) (2008), Handbook of Research on Global Corporate Citizenship, Cheltenham.Google Scholar
  97. Seth, Anju/ Zinkhan, George (1991), Strategy and the research process: A comment, in: Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 12, S. 75–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Shrivastava, Paul (1986), Is strategic management ideological?, in: Journal of Management, Vol. 12, S. 363–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Smith, N. Craig/ Simpson, Sally S./ Huang, Chun-Yao (2007), Why managers fail to do the right thing: An empirical study of unethical and illegal conduct, in: Business Ethics Quarterly, Vol. 17, S. 633–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Solomon, Robert C. (1993), Ethics and excellence, Oxford.Google Scholar
  101. Sonenshein, Scott (2007), The Role of Construction, Intuition, and Justification in Responding to Ethical Issues at Work: The Sensemaking-Intuition Model, in: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 32, S. 1022–1040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Spar, Debora L./ La Mure, Lane T. (2003), The power of activism: Assessing the impact of NGOs on global business, in: California Management Review, Vol. 45, S. 78–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Sundaram, Anant K./ Inkpen, Andrew C. (2004), The corporate objective revisited, in: Organization Science, Vol. 15, S. 350–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Teegen, Hildy/ Doh, Jonathan P./ Vachani, Sushil (2004), The importance of nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) in global governance and value creation: An international business research agenda, in: Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 35, S. 463–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Treviño, Linda K. (1986), Ethical decision making in organizations: a person-situation interactionist model, in: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 11, S. 601–617.Google Scholar
  106. Treviño, Linda Klebe/ Weaver, Gary R. (1994), Business ETHICS/BUSINESS ethics: One field or two?, in: Business Ethics Quarterly, Vol. 4, S. 113–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Visser, Wayne (2008), CSR in Developing Countries, in: Crane, Andrew/ McWilliams, Abagail/ Matten, Dirk/ Moon, Jeremy/ Siegel, Donald (Hrsg.), The Oxford Handbook of CSR, Oxford, in Druck.Google Scholar
  108. Visser, Wayne/ Matten, Dirk/ Pohl, Manfred/ Tolhurst, Nick (Hrsg.) (2008), The A-Z of Corporate Social Responsibility - The Complete Reference of Concepts, Codes and Organisations, London.Google Scholar
  109. Visser, Wayne/ McIntosh, Malcolm/ Middleton, Charlotte (Hrsg.) (2006), Corporate citizenship in Africa–Lessons from the past; paths into the future, Sheffield.Google Scholar
  110. Wartick, Steven L/ Cochran, Philip L. (1985), The evolution of the corporate social performance model, in: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 10, S. 758–769.Google Scholar
  111. Weick, Karl E. (1995), Sensemaking in Organizations, Thousand Oaks.Google Scholar
  112. Windsor, Duane (2008), Educating for Responsible Management, in: Crane, Andrew/ McWilliams, Abagail/ Matten, Dirk/ Moon, Jeremy/ Siegel, Donald (Hrsg.), The Oxford Handbook of CSR, Oxford.Google Scholar
  113. Wolf, Klaus Dieter (2006), Private actors and the legitimacy of governance beyond the state. Conceptional outlines and empirical explorations, in: Benz, Arthur/ Papadopoulos, Yannis (Hrsg.), Governance and Democracy Comparing National, European and International Experiences, London, S. 200–227.Google Scholar
  114. Wood, Donna J (1991), Corporate social performance revisited, in: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 16, S. 691–718.Google Scholar
  115. Young, Iris Marion (2004), Responsibility and global labor justice, in: Journal of Political Philosophy, Vol. 12, S. 365–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Schmalenbach-Gesellschaft.eV. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Hewlett-Packard Chair in Corporate Social Responsibility, Schulich School of BusinessYork UniversityTorontoCanada
  2. 2.Faculty of Business and EconomicsUniversity of LausanneLausanneSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations