Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection

, Volume 122, Issue 5–6, pp 250–254 | Cite as

Effect of Temperature on the Hatch of Two German Populations of the Beet Cyst nematodes, Heterodera schachtii and Heterodera betae

  • Bart AB Vandenbossche
  • Björn Niere
  • Stefan Vidal


Beet cyst nematodes, Heterodera schachtii and H. betae, cause damage to sugar beet production and could become even more important with an increase in soil temperatures. In northern Germany, temperatures are expected to rise by 4°C by 2100. In this study we investigated the hatch of two beet cyst nematode species at constant temperatures as well as simulated temperature conditions set to be 4°C higher than the standard temperature regime. The effect of different constant temperatures on the emergence of second-stage juveniles of H. schachtii and H. betae was investigated using six incubators set at 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30°C for a period of 6 weeks. In a second experiment, the effect of increased and standard temperature regimes on the emergence of second-stage juveniles of H. schachtii and H. betae was investigated in climate chambers for 12 weeks. The highest cumulative hatching rates for H. schachtii were observed at temperatures between 15 and 30°C and for H. betae between 20 and 30°C, suggesting that this can be considered as the optimal temperature range for hatch. The emergence of juveniles of both beet cyst nematode species started at 5°C, but cumulative hatch percentages were less than 1%. Differences in final cumulative hatching rate of H. schachtii and H. betae between the increased and standard temperature regime were not significant.

Key words

Global warming juvenile emergence life cycle thermal time 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Amiri S, Subbotin SA & Moens M, 2002. Identification of the beet cyst nematode Heterodera schachtii by PCR. Eur J Pl Pathol 108, 497–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Caswell EP & Thomason IJ, 1991. A model of egg production by Heterodera schachtii (Nematoda: Heteroderidae). Can J Zool 69, 2085–2088.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Clarke AJ & Shepherd AM, 1964. Synthetic hatching agents for Heterodera schachtii Schm. and their mode of action.Nematologica 10, 431–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Clarke AJ & Perry RN, 1977. Hatching of cyst-nematodes.Nematologica 23, 350–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cooke DA, 1991. The effect of beet cyst nematode, Heterodera schachtii, on the yield of sugar beet in organic soils 88. Ann Appl Biol 118, 153–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Curi J & Zmoray I, 1966. Beziehung klimatischer Faktoren zur Entwicklungsdauer von Heterodera schachtii in der Slowakei (CSSR). Helminthologia 7, 49–63.Google Scholar
  7. Franco J, 1979. Effect of temperature on hatching and multiplication of potato cyst-nematodes. Nematologica 25,237–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gracianne C, Petit E, Arnaud J-F, Porte C, Renault L, Fouville D, Rouaux C & Fournet S, 2014. Spatial distribution and basic ecology of Heterodera schachtii and H. betae wild populations developing on sea beet, Beta vulgaris ssp. maritima. Nematology 16, 797–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Griffin G, 1981a. The relationship of plant age, soil temperature, and population density of Heterodera schachtii on the growth of sugarbeet. J Nematol13, 184.Google Scholar
  10. Griffin G, 1981b. The Interaction of Heterodera schachtii and Ditylenchus dipsaci on sugarbeet. J Nematol 13, 441–441.Google Scholar
  11. Griffin G, 1988. Factors affecting the biology and pathogenicity of Heterodera schachtii on sugarbeet. J Nematol 20,396–404.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Jacob D & Podzun R, 1997. Sensitivity studies with the regional climate model REMO. Meteorl Atmos Phys 63,119–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kakaire S, Grove I & Haydock P, 2012. Effect of temperature on the life cycle of Heterodera schachtii infecting oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.). Nematology 14, 855–867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Maas PWT & Heijbroek W, 1982. Biology and pathogenicity of the yellow beet cyst nematode; a host race of Heterodera trifolii on sugar beet in the Netherlands. Nematologica 28, 77–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Müller J & Rumpenhorst H, 2000. Die Prüfung von Pflanzen auf ihre Widerstandsfähigkeit gegen Schadorganismen in der Biologischen Bundesanstalt. Teil 1 Prüfung von Kulturpflanzen auf Resistenz gegen pflanzenparasitäre Nematoden. Mitt Biol Bundesanst Land-Forstwirtsch Berlin-Dahlem 372, 38.Google Scholar
  16. Olthof T, 1983. Effect of plant age and transplanting damage on sugarbeets infected by Heterodera schachtii. J Nematol 15, 555–559.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Racca P, Kakau J, Kleinhenz B & Kuhn C, 2015. Impact of climate change on the phenological development of winter wheat, sugar beet and winter oilseed rape in Lower Saxony, Germany. J Plant Dis Protect 122, 16–27.Google Scholar
  18. Steele A, Toxopeus H & Heijbroek W, 1982. A comparison of the hatching of juveniles from cysts of Heterodera schachtii and H. trifolii. J Nematol 14, 588.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Steudel W & Thielemann R, 1970. Weitere Untersuchungen zur Frage der Empfindlichkeit von Zuckerrüben gegen den Rübennematoden (Heterodera schachtii Schmidt). Zucker 23, 106–109.Google Scholar
  20. Trudgill D, 1995. An assessment of the relevance of thermal time relationships to nematology. Fund Appl Nematol 18,407–417.Google Scholar
  21. Werner PC & Gerstengarbe FW, 2007. Welche Klimaänderungen sind in Deutschland zu erwarten? In: Endlicher W and Gerstengarbe FW (Ed.) 2007: Der Klimawandel-Einblicke, Rückblicke und Ausblicke. Potsdam-Institut für Klimafolgenforschung und Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin/Potsdam, 56–59.Google Scholar
  22. Wouts WM, Rumpenhorst HJ & Sturhan D, 2001. Heterodera betae sp n., the yellow beet cyst nematode (Nematoda: Heteroderidae). Russ J Nematol 9, 33–42.Google Scholar
  23. Wrather J & Anand S, 1988. Relationship between time of infection with Heterodera glycines and soybean yield. J Nematol 20, 439.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Yeates GW, Gaugler R & Bilgrami A, 2004. Ecological and behavioural adaptations. In: Gaugler R & Bilgrami AL (Eds.) 2004: Nematode Behaviour, 1–24. CAB International.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Zheng L & Ferris H, 1991. Four types of dormancy exhibited by eggs of Heterodera schachtii. Rev Nématol 14, 419–426.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Deutsche Phythomedizinische Gesellschaft 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bart AB Vandenbossche
    • 1
  • Björn Niere
    • 1
  • Stefan Vidal
    • 2
  1. 1.Julius Kühn-Institut, Federal Research Centre for Cultivated PlantsInstitute for National and International Plant HealthBraunschweigGermany
  2. 2.Department of Crop Science, Agricultural EntomologyGeorg-August University GoettingenGöttingenGermany

Personalised recommendations