Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection

, Volume 119, Issue 1, pp 15–23 | Cite as

Plant age and timing of epidemic initiation affect mycosphaerella blight in field pea

  • Sheau-Fang Hwang
  • Kan-Fa Chang
  • Robert L. Conner
  • Bruce D. Gossen
  • George D. Turnbull


Mycosphaerella blight (Mycosphaerella pinodes) occurs throughout western Canada and can severely reduce seed yield and quality of field pea (Pisum sativum). Field experiments were conducted to assess the impact of seeding date and timing of epidemic initiation on the severity of mycosphaerella blight on field pea. Early seeding or early initiation of the epidemic (early July) resulted in the highest severity and area under disease progress curve of mycosphaerella blight at the end of the growing season. Plants seeded later in the growing season showed less severe symptoms of mycosphaerella blight compared to those seeded earlier, and the blight severity was declined by delaying 1–2 weeks of disease initiation. However, late seeding reduces yield potential offsetting the benefit of disease reduction. A greenhouse study on the effect of both plant and tissue age on susceptibility to mycosphaerella blight revealed that both whole plants and leaf tissues became more susceptible as they aged. We conclude that delay of epidemic initiation in late June to early July through the use of foliar fungicides is effective in reducing mycosphaerella blight severity on the Canadian prairies.

Key words

crop management fungicide Mycosphaerella pinodes Pisum sativum 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ahmed HU, Chang KF, Hwang SF, Gossen BD, Howard RJ & Warkentin TD, 2006. Components of disease resistance in desi and kabuli chickpea varieties against ascochyta blight. Plant Pathol J 5, 336–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ali SM, Nitschke LF, Dube AJ, Krause MR & Cameron B, 1978. Selection of pea lines for resistance to pathotypes of Ascochyta pinodes, A. pisi and Phoma medicaginis var. pinodella. Aust Agric Res 29, 841–849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bretag TW, Keane PJ & Price TV, 2000. Effect of sowing date on the severity of ascochyta blight in field peas (Pisum sativum L.) grown in the Wimmera region of Victoria. Aust J Exp Agric 40, 1113–1119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Burdon JJ & Chilvers GA, 1982. Host density as a factor in plant disease ecology. Annu Rev Phytopathol 20, 143–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen C, Miller P, Muehlbauer F, Neill K, Wichman D & McPhee K, 2006. Winter pea and lentil response to seeding date and micro- and macro-environments. Agron J 98, 1655–1663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chongo G & Gossen BD, 2001. Effect of plant age on resistance to Ascochyta rabiei in chickpea. Can J Plant Pathol 23, 358–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Conner RL, Hwang SF, Woods SM, Chang KF, Bing DJ, Dongfang Y, Su H, McAndrew DW & Yager LM, 2007. Influence of agronomic traits on the expression of tissue-specific resistance to mycosphaerella blight in field peas. Can J Plant Sci 87, 157–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gossen BD, Buchwald L, Kutcher HR & Chongo G, 2005. Decision support systems for management of foliar blight on lentil and field pea in western Canada. P. 93 in Proc 9th Int Workshop on Plant Disease Epidemiology. Int Soc for Plant Pathology, Landerneau, France, April 11–15, 2005.Google Scholar
  9. Hwang SF, Gossen BD, Turnbull GD, Chang KF, Howard RJ & Thomas AG, 2000. Seeding date, temperature and seed treatment affect pythium seedling blight of field pea. Can J Plant Pathol 22, 392–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hwang SF, Conner RL, Chang KF, Gossen BD, Su H, Howard RJ & Turnbull GD, 2006. Effect of seed rate, seed infection, and seeding depth on mycosphaerella blight and seed yield of field pea. Can J Plant Sci 86, 845–853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. LeMay C, Jumel S, Schoeny A & Tivoli B, 2009a. Ascochyta blight development on a new winter pea genotype highly reactive to photoperiod under field conditions. Field Crops Res 111, 32–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. LeMay C, Ney B, Lemarchand E, Schoeny A & Tivoli B, 2009b. Effect of pea plant architecture on spatiotemporal epidemic development of ascochyta blight (Mycosphaerella pinodes) in the field. Plant Pathol 58, 332–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Richard B, Jumel S, Rouault F & Tivoli B, 2011. Influence of plant stage and organ age on the receptivity of Pisum sativum to Mycosphaerella pinodes. Eur J Plant Pathol 131. DOI: 10.1007/s10658-011-9882-3.Google Scholar
  14. Roger C & Tivoli B, 1996. Spatio-temporal development of pycnidia and perithecia and dissemination of spores of Mycosphaerella pinodes on pea (Pisum sativum). Plant Pathol 45, 518–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Roger C, Tivoli B & Huber L, 1999a. Effects of interrupted wet periods and different temperatures on the development of ascochyta blight caused by Mycosphaerella pinodes on pea (Pisum sativum) seedlings. Plant Pathol 48, 10–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Roger C, Tivoli B & Huber L, 1999b. Effects of temperature and moisture on disease and fruit body development of Mycosphaerella pinodes on pea. Plant Pathol 48, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. SAS Institute Inc. 1989. SAS/STAT user’s guide. Version 5, Vol. 2, 4th ed., SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, NC. 846 pp.Google Scholar
  18. Wallen VR, 1974. Influence of three ascochyta diseases of peas on plant development and yield. Can Plant Dis Surv 54, 86–90.Google Scholar
  19. Wang H, Hwang SF, Turnbull GD, Chang KF & Howard RJ, 1999. Ascochyta blight and other diseases of field pea in northeastern Alberta in 1998. Can Plant Dis Surv 79, 116–118. []Google Scholar
  20. Wang TF, Gossen BD & Slinkard AE, 2006. Lodging increases severity and impact of mycosphaerella blight on field pea. Can J Plant Sci 86, 855–863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Warkentin TD, Rashid KY & Xue AG, 1996. Fungicidal control of ascochyta blight of field pea. Can J Plant Sci 76, 67–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Wilcoxson RD, Skovmand B & Atif AH, 1975. Evaluation of wheat cultivars for ability to retard development of stem rust. Ann Appl Biol 80, 275–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Xue AG, Tuey HJ & Platford RG, 1999. Diseases of field pea in Manitoba in 1998. Can Plant Dis Surv 79, 119–120. []Google Scholar
  24. Xue AG & Warkentin TD, 2001. Partial resistance to Mycosphaerella pinodes in field pea. Can J Plant Sci 81, 535–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Xue AG, Warkentin TD, Gossen BD, Burnett PA, Vandenberg A & Rashid KY, 1998. Pathogenic variation of western Canadian isolates of Mycosphaerella pinodes on selected Pisum sativum genotypes. Can J Plant Pathol 20, 189–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Xue AG, Warkentin TD, Greeniaus MT & Zimmer RC, 1996. Genotypic variability in seedborne infection of field pea by Mycosphaerella pinodes and its relation to foliar disease severity. Can J Plant Pathol 18, 370–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Xue AG, Warkentin TD & Kenaschuk EO, 1997. Effects of timing of inoculation with Mycosphaerella pinodes on yield and seed infection of field pea. Can J Plant Sci 78, 685–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Zhang JX, Fernando WGD, Xue AG, 2005. Daily and seasonal spore dispersal by Mycosphaerella pinodes and development of mycosphaerella blight of field pea. Can J Bot 83, 302–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Deutsche Phythomedizinische Gesellschaft 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sheau-Fang Hwang
    • 1
  • Kan-Fa Chang
    • 1
  • Robert L. Conner
    • 2
  • Bruce D. Gossen
    • 3
  • George D. Turnbull
    • 1
  1. 1.Alberta Agriculture and Rural DevelopmentCrop Diversification CentreEdmontonCanada
  2. 2.Agriculture and Agri-Food CanadaMorden Research CentreMordenCanada
  3. 3.Agriculture and Agri-Food CanadaSaskatoon Research CentreSaskatoonCanada

Personalised recommendations