Abstract
The use of plant growth promoting bacteria (PGPB) is an economically and environmental friendly alternative to the application of chemical fertilizers resp. pesticides in agriculture. To obtain novel bacterial strains that could be used for plant growth promotion (PGP) in the agriculture of Bolivia, plant associated bacteria derived from horseradish tree (Moringa oleifera), sorghum (Sorghum vulgare), sunflower (Helianthus annuus), and safflower (Carthamus tinctorius) were screened for direct and indirect in vitro PGP traits. Subsequently, most promising strains were selected for ad planta studies. According to in vitro experiments, out of 59 tested isolates, 19% were declared as diazotrophs, 41% as solubilizers of phosphorus, 10% were able to reduce the ethylene precursor 1-aminocy-clopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC), and 17% exhibited phytohormone (IAA) synthesis. Only a small proportion of rhizo-bacterial strains (7% out of 276) showed in vitro antagonism against plant pathogenic Colletotrichum sp., whereas none of isolated stem and leaf endophytes inhibited growth of Verticillium chlamydosporum or Bipolaris maydis in dual culture. Based on results of in vitro screens, the rhizospheric strains Pectobacterium cypripedii M56, Pantoea agglomerans M72, and P. agglomerans M81 were selected for ad planta applications. Results revealed significant increases in number of beans per black bean plant resp. diameters of flower heads of sunflower plants compared to controls by P. agglomerans M72. We conclude that the assessment and selection of plant associated bacteria based on traits conferring theoretically PGP can provide the basis for the development of new microbial inoculants for agricultural purposes.
Zusammenfassung
Die Anwendung pflanzenwachstumsfördernder Bakterien in der Landwirtschaft kann eine profitable und umweltschonende Alternative zum Einsatz von chemischen Düngemitteln und Pestiziden darstellen. Um neue, bakterielle Pflanzenwachstumsförderer für die bolivianische Landwirtschaft zu gewinnen, wurden pflanzenassoziierte Bakterien von Meerrettichbaum (Moringa oleifera), Sorghumhirse (Sorghum vulgare), Sonnenblume (Helianthus annuus) und Färberdistel (Carthamus tinctorius) isoliert und in vitro auf direkte und indirekte Mechanismen der Pflanzenwachstumsförderung untersucht. Ausgehend von 59 unter Laborbedingungen getesteten Isolaten, waren 19% diazotroph, 41% wurden als Phosphor-Solubilisierer deklariert, 17% zeigten Phytohormonsynthese (IAA) und 10% wurden als Verwerter der Ethy- len-Vorläufer-Substanz 1-Aminocyclopropan-1-Carbonsäure (ACC) erklärt. Nur ein geringer Anteil rhizobakterieller Stämme (7% von 276) zeigte antagonistische Aktivität in vitro gegen das Pflanzenpathogen Colletotrichum sp., während keiner der von Stängeln oder Blättern isolierten Endophyten das Wach stum von Verticillium chlamydosporum oder Bipolaris maydis in Dualkultur inhibieren konnte. Basierend auf den Resultaten der in vitro Tests, wurden die Rhizosphären-Stämme Pectobacterium cypripedii M56, Pantoea agglomerans M72 und P. agglomerans M81 für die Applikation in Freilandexperimenten selektiert, wobei P. agglomerans M72 zu signifikant höheren Bohnenzahlen bei schwarzer Bohne bzw. Blütenkorbdurchmessern bei Sonnenblume im Vergleich zu Kontroll-Behandlungen geführt hat. Die Bewertung und Selektion pflanzenassoziierter Bakterien, basierend auf deren pflanzenwachstumsfördernden Eigenschaften in vitro, stellt die Grundlage für die Entwicklung neuer biologischer Produkte für landwirtschaftliche Zwecke dar.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Altschul, S.F., T.L. Madden, A.A. Schaffer, J.H. Zhang, Z. Zhang, W. Miller, D.J. Lipman, 1997: Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 25, 3389–3402.
Bashan, Y., G. Holguin, 1998: Proposal for the division of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria into two classifications: Biocontrol-PGPB (plant growth-promoting bacteria) and PBPB. Soil. Biol. Biochem. 30, 1225–1228.
Berg, G., A. Krechel, M. Ditz, R.A. Sikora, A. Ulrich, J. Hall-Mann, 2005: Endophytic and ectophytic potato-associated bacterial communities differ in structure and antagonistic function against plant pathogenic fungi. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 51, 215–229.
Berg, G., J. Hallmann, 2006: Control of plant pathogenic fungi with bacterial endophytes. In: B. SCHULZ, C. BOYLE, T. SIEBER (eds.): Microbial Root Endophytes, pp. 53–70. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York.
Berg, G., K. Opelt, C. Zachow, J. Lottmann, M. Götz, R. Costa, K. Smalla, 2006: The rhizosphere effect on bacteria antagonistic towards the pathogenic fungus Verticillium differs depending on plant species and site. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 56, 250–261.
Berg, G., H. Müller, C. Zachow, K. Opelt, K. Scherwinski, R. Tilcher, A. Ullrich, J. Hallmann, R. Grosch, A. Sessitsch, 2008: Endophytes: structural and functional diversity and biotechnological applications in control of plant pathogens. Ecol. Gen. 6, 17–26.
Bloemberg, G.V., B.J.J. Lugtenberg, 2001: Molecular basis of plant growth promotion and biocontrol by rhizobacteria. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 4, 343–350.
Bonaterra, A., L. Ruz, E. Badosa, J. Pinochet, E. Montesinos, 2003: Growth promotion of Prunus rootstocks by root treatment with specific bacterial strains. Plant Soil 255, 555–569.
Brown, C.M., M.J. Dilworth, 1975: Ammonia assimilation by Rhizobium cultures and bacteroids. J. Gen. Microbiol. 86, 39–48.
Cattelan, A.J., P.G. Hartel, J.J. Fuhrmann, 1999: Screening for plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria to promote soybean growth. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 63, 1670–1680.
Chernin, L., I. Chet, 2002: Microbial enzymes in the biocontrol of plant pathogens and pests. In: R.G. BURNS, R.P. DICK (eds.): Enzymes in the Environment — Activity, Ecology and Applications, pp. 171–226. Marcel Dekker, New York.
Compant, S., B. Duffy, J. Nowak, C. Clément, E.A. Barka, 2005: Use of plant growth-promoting bacteria for biocontrol of plant diseases: principles, mechanisms of action, and future prospects. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71, 4951–4959.
Dart, P.J., 1986: Nitrogen fixation associated with non-legumes in agriculture. Plant Soil 90, 303–334.
Dobbelare, S., J. Vanderleydern, Y. Okon, 2003: Plant-growth promoting effects of diazotrophs in the rhizosphere. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 22, 107–149.
El-Shanshoury, A.R., 1989: Growth promotion of wheat seedlings by Streptomyces atroolivaceus. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 163, 109–114.
Fahey, J.W., A.T. Zalcmann, P. Talalay, 2001: The chemical diversity and distribution of glucosinolates and isothiocyanates among plants. Phytochemistry 56, 5–51.
Faure, D., D. Vereecke, J.H.J. Leveau, 2008: Molecular communication in the rhizosphere. Plant Soil, DOI 10.1007/s11104-008-9839-2.
Glick, B.R. 2005: Modulation of plant ethylene levels by the bacterial enzyme ACC deaminase. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 252, 1–7.
Gull, M., F.Y. Hafeez, M. Saleem, K.A. Malik, 2004: Phosphorus uptake and growth promotion of chickpea by co-inoculation of mineral phosphate solubilising bacteria and a mixed rhizobial culture. Austral. J. Exp. Agric. 44, 623–628.
Hartmann, A., D. van Tuinen, G. Berg, 2009: Plant-driven selection of microbes. In: P. LEMANCEAU (ed.), Rhizosphere, a Major Place of Interactions. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, in press.
Kadam, S.S., K.G. Kachhave, J.K. Chavan, D.K. Salunkhe, 1977: Effect of nitrogen, Rhizobium inoculation and simazine on yield and quality of Bengal gram (Cicer arietinum L.). Plant Soil 47, 279–281.
Kjaer, A., O. Malver, B. El-Menshawi, J. Reisch, 1979: Isothiocyanates in myrosinase-treated seed extracts of Moringa peregrina. Phytochemistry 18, 1485–1487.
Krebs, B., B. Höding, S. Kübart, M.A. Workie, H. Junge, G. Schmiedeknecht, R. Grosch, H. Bochow, M. Hevesi, 1998: Use of Bacillus subtilis as biocontrol agent. I. Activities and characterization of Bacillus subtilis strains. J. Plant Dis. Protect. 105, 181–197.
Kurze, S., H. Bahl, R. Dahl, G. Berg, 2001: Biological control of fungal strawberry diseases by Serratia plymuthica HRO-C48. Plant Dis. 85, 529–534.
O’Sullivan, D.J., F. O’Gara, 1992: Traits of fluorescent Pseudomonas spp. involved in suppression of plant root pathogens. Microbiol. Rev. 56, 662–676.
Raaijmakers, J.M., T.C. Paulitz, C. Steinberg, C. Alabouvette, Y. Moenne-Loccoz, 2008: The rhizosphere: a playground and battlefield for soilborne pathogens and beneficial microorganisms. Plant Soil, DOI 10.1007/s11104-008-9568-6.
Reddy, M.S., R.K. Hynes, G. Lazarovits, 1994: Relationship between in vitro growth inhibition of pathogens and suppression of preemergence damping-off and postemergence root rot of white bean seedlings in the greenhouse by bacteria. Can. J. Microbiol. 40, 113–119.
Rumberger, A., P. Marschner, 2003: 2-Phenylethylisothiocyanate concentration and microbial community composition in the rhizosphere of canola. Soil. Biol. Biochem. 35, 445–452.
Sergeeva, E., L. Danielle, M. Hirkala, L.M. Nelson, 2007: Production of indole-3-acetic acid, aromatic amino acid aminotransferase activities and plant growth promotion by Pantoea agglomerans rhizosphere isolates. Plant Soil 297, 1–13.
Sessitsch, A., T. Coenye, A.V. Sturz, P. Vandamme, E.A. Barka, J.F. Salles, J.D. Van Elsas, D. Faure, B. Reiter, B.R. Glick, G. Wang-Pruski, J. Nowak, 2005: Burkholderia phytofirmans sp. nov., a novel plant-associated bacterium with plant-beneficial properties. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 55, 1187–1192.
Van Loon, L.C., 2007: Plant responses to plant growth promoting bacteria. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 119, 243–254.
Weller, D.M., R.J. Cook, 1983: Suppression of take-all of wheat by seed treatments with fluorescent pseudomonads. Phytopathology 73, 463–469.
Whipps, J.M., 2001: Microbial interactions and biocontrol in the rhizosphere. J. Exp. Bot. 52, 487–511.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fürnkranz, M., Müller, H. & Berg, G. Characterization of plant growth promoting bacteria from crops in Bolivia. J Plant Dis Prot 116, 149–155 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03356303
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03356303