International Journal of Metalcasting

, Volume 7, Issue 4, pp 17–33 | Cite as

Dynamic Fracture Toughness of High Strength Cast Steels

  • L. Bartlett
  • A. Dash
  • D. Van Aken
  • V. Richards
  • K. Peaslee


The dynamic fracture toughness of Cr and Mo steels with nickel contents of 0, 1.56, and 5.5 wt.% was evaluated and compared to a lightweight steel of composition Fe-30.40%Mn-8.83%Al-1.07%Si-0.90%C-0.53%Mo. Each steel was heat treated to a Rockwell C-scale hardness range of 36 to 38. The 4130, 4325, and HY130 steels were quench-hardened and tempered. The lightweight steel was solution treated, water quenched, and age hardened. In the hardness range of Rockwell C36 to C38, the lightweight steel, the 4325 steel, and the Al-killed and Ca-treated HY130 steel had similar dynamic fracture toughness values of 153, 153, and 165 kJ/m2, respectively. The 4130 steel had a much lower toughness of 94 kJ/m2. The lightweight Fe-Mn-Al-C alloy performed better at Rockwell C32, producing the highest dynamic fracture toughness of 376 kJ/m2. Toughness of the Cr and Mo steels was strongly dependent on deoxidation practice. Alloys treated with ferro-titanium showed a reduction in toughness, which was attributed to TiN particles and in one case eutectic Type II sulfides. Addition of misch metal to an aluminum and ferro-titanium treated HY130 steel eliminated the Type II sulfides and increased the dynamic fracture toughness from 58 to 88 kJ/m2. HY130 obtained the highest toughness (165 kJ/m2) when aluminum deoxidation was followed by calcium treatment.


high strength cast steels dynamic fracture toughness inclusion analysis 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Anderson, T.L., Fracture Mechanics: Fundamentals and Applications, third edition. Taylor and Francis, New York (2005).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    ASTM E813-89, Standard Test Method for Jic, a Measure of Fracture Toughness.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    ASTM E1820, Standard Test Method for Measurement of Fracture Toughness.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Schindler, H.J., “Estimation of the Dynamic J-R Curve from a Single Impact Bending Test,” Mechanisms and Mechanics of Damage and Failure: Proceedings of the 11th ECF (1996).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Leslie, W.C., “The Physical Metallurgy of Steels,” Hemisphere Publishing Co. (1981).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sims, C.E., Briggs, C.W., “A Primer on Deoxidation,” Journal of Metals, pp. 815–822 (1959).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Garrison, W.M., Moody, N.R., “The Influence of Spacing and Microstructure on the Fracture Toughness of Secondary Hardening Steel AF 1410,” Met. Trans. A, vol. 18A, pp. 1257–1263 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Barsom, J.M., Pellegrino, J.V., “Relationship Between K1c and Plastic-Strain Tensile Ductility and Microscopic Mode of Fracture,” Engineering Fracture Mechanics, vol. 5, pp. 209–221 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Joyce, J.A., Hacket, E.M., “Dynamic J-R Curve Testing of a High Strength Steel Using the Multispecimen and Key Curve Techniques,” ASTM STP 905, ASTM, Philadelphia, PA., pp. 741–774 (1984).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Howell, R.A., Montgomery, J.S., Van Aken, D.C., “Advancements in Steel for Weight Reduction of P900 Armor Plate,” AIST Trans. 6(5), pp. 168–176 (2009).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kayak, G.L., “Fe-Mn-Al Precipitation-Hardening Austenitic Alloys,” Met. Sc. and Heat Tr., vol. 11, pp. 95–97 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kalashnikov, I.S., Acselrad, O., Shalkevich, A., Chumokova, L.D., Pereira, L.C., “Heat Treatment and Thermal Stability of FeMnAlC Alloys,” Journal of Materials Processing Technology, vol 136, pp. 72–79 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sato, K., Igarashi, Y., Inoue, Y., Yamazaki, T., Yamanaka, M., “Microstructure and Age Hardening in Spinodally Decomposed Austenitic Fe-Mn-Al-C Alloys,” Proceedings of the International Conference on Stainless Steels (1991).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Howell, R.A., Weerasooriya, T., and Van Aken, D.C., “Tensile, High Strain Rate Compression and Microstructural Evaluation of Lightweight Age Hardenable Cast Fe-30Mn-9Al-XSi-0.9C-0.5Mo Steel,” Transactions of the American Foundry Society (2008).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Frommeyer, G., Brux, U., “Microstructures and Mechanical Properties of High-Strength Fe-Mn-Al-C Light-Weight TRIPLEX Steels,” Steel Research Int., vol. 77, pp. 627–633 (2006).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Choo, W.K., Kim, J.H., “Microstructure and Mechanical Property Changes on Precipitation of Intermetallic κ′ in the Fe-Mn(Ni)-Al-C Solid Solution” Conf. on Thermo-mechanical Process. of Steels and Other Mats., pp. 1631–1637 (1997).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sato, K., Tagawa, K., Inoue, Y., “Modulated Structure and Magnetic Properties of Age-Hardenable Fe-Mn-Al-C Alloys”, Met. Trans A, vol. 21A, pp. 5–11 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Van Aken, D.C., Howell, R.A., Bartlett, L.N., Schulte, A.M., Lekakh, S.N., Medvedeva, J., Richards, V.L., Peaslee, K.D., “Casting P900 Armor with Lightweight Steel,” 63rd Technical & Operating Conference of the Steel Founders’ Society of America, paper 3-2 (2009).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Schulte, A.M., Lekakh, S.N., Van Aken, D.C., Richards, V.L., “Phosphorus Mitigation in Cast Lightweight Fe-Mn-Al-C Steel,” 114th Metalcasting Congress, Orlando, FL, March 19–23 (2010).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bartlett, L.N., Schulte, A.M., Van Aken, D.C., Peaslee, K.D., Howell, R.A., “A Review of the Physical and Mechanical Properties of a High Strength and Lightweight FeMnAlC Steel,” MS&T 2010 Conference Proceedings, Houston TX (2010).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kalthoff, J.F., Gregor, M., “Instrumented Impact Testing of Subsize Charpy V-Notch Specimens,” Small Specimen Test Techniques, ASTM STP 1329 (1998).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Courtney, T.H., Mechanical Behavior of Materials, second edition, Waveland Press, pp. 459–461 (2005).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Magudeeswaran, G., Balasubramanian, V., Sathyanarayanan, S., Reddy, G., Moitra, A., Venugopal, S., Sasikala. G., “Dynamic Fracture Toughness Behavior of Armor-Grade Q&T Steel Weldments: Effect of Weld Metal Composition and Microstructure,” Met. Mater. Int., vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 1017–1026 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Fairchild, D.G., Howden, D.P., Clark, W.A.T. “The Mechanism of Brittle Fracture in a Microalloyed Steel: Part 1. Inclusion Induced Cleavage,” Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, vol. 31A, pp. 641–652 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Fairchild, D.P., Howden, D.G., Clark, W.A.T., “The Mechanism of Brittle Fracture in a Microalloyed Steel: Part 2. Mechanistic Modeling,” Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, vol. 31A, pp. 653–667 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Yan, W., Shan, Y.Y., Yang, K., “Effect of TiN Inclusions on the Impact Toughness of Low Carbon Microalloyed Steels,” Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, vol. 37A, pp. 2147–2158 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Porter, L.F., “Effect of Sulfur Content and Sulfide Shape on Shelf Energy of High Strength Steels,” Paper presented at William Hunt Eisenman Conference on Fracture Control, American Society for Metals, Philadelphia, PA (January 27, 1970).Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kuslitskii, A.B., Kurilo, Zlotnikov, S.A., Starchak, V.G., “Effect of the Composition of Nonmetallic Inclusions on the Susceptibility of Steel 20 to Hydrogen Embrittlement,” Materials Science, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 623–624 (1970).Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hale, G.E. and Baker, A.J., “Carbide Precipitation in Austenitic Fe-Mn-Al-C Alloys,” Alternative Alloying for Environmental Resistance, New Orleans, LA (March 2–6 1986).Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    McClintock, F.M. “Plasticity Aspects of Fracture,” Fracture, Academic Press, New York and London, vol. 3, pp. 47–225 (1971).Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Beremin, F.M., “Cavity Formation from Inclusions in the Ductile Fracture of A508 Steel,” Metallurgical Transactions A, vol. 12A, pp. 723–731 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Broek, D., “Engineering Fracture Mechanics,” Pergamon Press (1973).Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Deimel, P., Sattler, E., “Non-Metallic Inclusions and Their Relation to the J-integral at Physical Crack Initiation for Different Steels and Weld Metals,” Journal of Materials Science, vol. 33, pp. 1723–1736 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hahn, G.T., Kanninen, M.F., Rosenfield, A.R., “Fracture Toughness of Materials,” Annual Review of Materials Science, vol. 2, pp. 381–404 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Hahn, G.T., Rosenfield, A.R., “Metallurgical Factors Affecting Fracture Toughness of Aluminum Alloys,” Met. Trans. A, vol. 6A, pp. 653–667 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Garrison, W.M., “Controlling Inclusion Distributions to Achieve High Toughness in Steels,” AIST Trans., vol. 4, pp. 132–139 (2007).Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Leskovsek, V., Ule, B., Liscic, B., “Relations Between Fracture Toughness, Hardness and Microstructure of Vacuum Heat Treated High Speed Steel,” Journal of Materials Processing and Technology, pp. 298–308, (2002).Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Brown, L.M., Embury, J.F., “The Microstructure and Design of Alloys,” Proceedings of the Third International Conference on the Strength of Metals and Alloys (Cambridge) The Institute of Metals, vol.1, p.164 (1973).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© American Foundry Society 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. Bartlett
    • 1
  • A. Dash
    • 2
  • D. Van Aken
    • 2
  • V. Richards
    • 2
  • K. Peaslee
    • 2
  1. 1.Texas State University-San MarcosSan MarcosUSA
  2. 2.Missouri University of Science and EngineeringRollaUSA

Personalised recommendations