Spatial Demography

, Volume 1, Issue 1, pp 120–130 | Cite as

What are Spatial Data? When are They Sufficient?

  • Lee R. Mobley
Open Access


Social Science Public Policy Science Research Open Access Geographical Information 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Acevedo-Garcia, D., Osypuk, T. L., McArdle, N., & Williams, D. R. (2008). Toward a policy-relevant analysis of geographic and racial/ethnic disparities in child health. Health Affairs (Project Hope), 27(2), 321–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aday, L. A., & Andersen, R. (1974). A framework for the study of access to medical care. Health Services Research, 9, 208–220.Google Scholar
  3. Baranowski T, Anderson C, Carmack C: Mediating variable framework in physical activity interventions: How are we doing? How might we do better? Am J Prev Med 1998, 15:266–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barker, L. E., Kirtland, K. A., Gregg, E. W., Geiss, L. S., & Thompson, T. J. (2011, April). Geographic distribution of diagnosed diabetes in the U.S.: A diabetes belt. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 40(4), 434–439. PubMed PMID: 21406277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blakely T, Woodward A: Ecological effects in multilevel studies. J Epidemiol Community Health 2000, 54:367–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bronfenbrenner U: The Ecology of Human Development. Experiments by Nature and Design Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press; 1979.Google Scholar
  7. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2009, November 20). Estimated county- level prevalence of diabetes and obesity, United States, 2007. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 58(45) 4259–1263. Available at: Scholar
  8. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2012). Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: National Diabetes Surveillance System. Available at: Scholar
  9. Diez-Roux A: Bringing context back into epidemiology: Variables and fallacies in multilevel analysis. Am J Public Health 1998, 88:216–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Duncan C, Jones K, Moon G: Context, composition, and heterogeneity: using multilevel models in health research. Soc Sci Med 1998, 46:97–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Duncan C, Jones K, Moon G: Health-related behavior in context: a multilevel modeling approach. Soc Sci Med 1996, 42:817–830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Frazier, E. L., Franks, A. L., & Sanderson, L. M. (1992). Using Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance data. In Using chronic disease data: A handbook for public health practitioners. Atlanta GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.Google Scholar
  13. Jia, H., Muennig, P., & Borawski, E. (2004). Comparison of small-area analysis techniques for estimating county-level outcomes. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 26(5), 453–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Khan, A. A, & Bhardwaj, S. M. (1994). Access to health care: A conceptual framework and its relevance to health care planning. Evaluation & the Health Professions, 17, 60–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Krieger N: Epidemiology and the web of causation: has anyone seen the spider? Soc Sci Med 1994, 39:887–903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kuo, T., and Mobley, L., and Anselin, L., “Geographic Disparities in Late-Stage Breast Cancer Diagnosis in California”, Health&Place, v 17 (2011) 327–334.Google Scholar
  17. Mobley, L., Kuo, M., Urato, M., Subramanian, S., Watson, L., and Anselin, L., “Spatial Heterogeneity inGoogle Scholar
  18. Cancer Control Planning and Cancer Screening Behavior” forthcoming in the 2012 Special Issue on the Geography of Health in the Annals of the Association of American Geographers (special issue September 2012).Google Scholar
  19. Mobley, L., Kuo, T., and Urato, M., and Subramanian, S.,(2010) “Community contextual predictors of endoscopic colorectal cancer screening in the USA: spatial multilevel regression analysis”, International Journal of Health Geographies, 2010, 9:44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mobley, L.R., T. Kuo, and L.S. Andrews. (2008). How Sensitive are Multilevel RegressionGoogle Scholar
  21. Findings to Defined Area of Context? A Case Study of Mammography Use in California.Google Scholar
  22. Medical Care Research and Review, v 65, pp 315–337; PMID: 18259047Google Scholar
  23. Osypuk, T. and Acevedo-Garcia, D. 2010. Beyond individual neighborhoods: A geography of opportunity perspective for understanding racial/ethnic health disparities, Health&Place. Doi:10.1016/j.healthplace. 2010.07.002Google Scholar
  24. Pickle, L., & Su, Y. (2002). Within-state geographic patterns of health insurance coverage and health risk factors in the United States. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 22(2), 79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sallis J, Bauman A, Pratt M: Environmental and policy interventions to promote physical activity. Am J Prev Med 1998, 15:379–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sallis J, Owen N, Frank L: Behavioral epidemiology: a systematic framework to classify phases of research on health promotion and disease prevention. Ann Behav Med 2000, 22:294–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sallis J, Owen N: Physical Activity and Behavioral Medicine. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1999.Google Scholar
  28. Schad, P., Mobley, L., and Hamilton, C. (2011) “Building a Biomedical Cyberinfrastructure for Collaborative Research”, American Journal of Preventive Medicine, Supplement: Cyberinfrastructure for Consumer Health, v 40(5S2) (AMEPRE_3067), S144–S150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Schmid T, Pratt M, Witmer L: A framework for physical activity policy research. J Phys Act Health 2006, 3(Suppl 1):S20–S29.Google Scholar
  30. Schulz A, Kannan S, Dvonch J, Israel B, Allen A, James S, House J, Lepkowski J: Social and physical environments and disparities in risk for cardiovascular disease: the healthy environments partnership conceptual model. Environ Health Perspect 2005, 113:1817–1825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Smedley B, Syme S (Eds): Promoting Health: Strategies from Social and Behavioral Research. Institute of Medicine, Washington DC: National Academies Press; 2000.Google Scholar
  32. Susser M, Susser E: Choosing a future for epidemiology: from black box to Chinese boxes and eco-epidemiology. Am J Public Health 1996, 86:674–677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wakefield, J. C., Best, N. G., & Waller, L. A. (2000). Bayesian approaches to disease mapping. In P. Elliott, J. C. Wakefield, N. G. Best, & D. J. Briggs (Eds.), Spatial epidemiology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, Cham 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lee R. Mobley

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations