, Volume 31, Issue 5, pp 12–12 | Cite as

Review of Developments in Hydrometallurgy in 1978

  • Milton E. Wadsworth
Developments in General Principle


Uranium Chalcopyrite Cyanide Solution Supported Liquid Membrane Ferric Chloride Solution 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    107th AIME Annual Meeting, Denver, Colorado, February 26–March 2, 1978.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    “17th Annual Conference of Metallurgists with Joint 8th Hydrometallurgy Meeting,” CIM Bull., 71 (1978) pp. 143-145.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    “Post Script to Hong Kong Conference,” Min. Mag., 139 (1978) pp. 126-137.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    “A View of the Uranium Institute Program,” Min. Mag., 139 (1978) pp. 138-141.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    D.A. Shock, “In Situ Highlights - Synopsis of South Texas Uranium In Situ Symposium,” In Situ, 2 (1978) pp. 229-246.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Technology Transfer Seminar of In Situ, Leading and Borehole Mining of Uranium, Denver, Colorado, July 26, 1978; contact: D. E. Ralston, U.S.B.M., 2401 E Street, NW, Washington, D.C., 20241.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    “Review, 1977,” Min. Eng. 30 (1978) pp. 499-509.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    M. E. Wadsworth, “Annual Review - Hydrometallurgy,” J. Metals, 29 (1978) pp. 32-36.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    I. C. Herbert and J. F. Castle, “Extractive Metallurgy (Mining Annual Review)”, Min. Mag., 138 (1978) pp. 293-319.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    R. Shantz and J. Reich, “A Review of Copper-Cyanide Metallurgy,” Hydrometallurgy, 3 (1978) pp. 99-109.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    N.M. Rice, “Recent Developments and Potential Uses for Carboxylic Acid Extractants,” Hydrometallurgy, 3 (1978) pp. 111-133.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    “Uranium Mining Developments in Wyoming, U.S.,” Min. Mag., 38 (1978) p. 539.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    “Industry Newswatch,” Min. Eng., 30 (1978) p. 736.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    “This Month in Mining,” EMJ, 179 (1978) pp. 33-34.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    M. H. Pettibone and W.W. Cody, “Sohio’s L-Bar Uranium Mill,” CIM Bull, 71 (1978) pp. 151-156.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    H. J. McGarr and E. Dement, “‘Pure’ Mill Recovers Uranium from Small Deposits,” EMJ, 179 (1978) pp. 214-216.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    P. Eyzaguirre, V. R., R. Ellerman and L. Gormley, “Cerro Verde Project-Stage 1 - ‘Copper-Oxides to Cathodes’,” CIM Bull, 71 (1978) pp. 96-108.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    R.J. Bonnis and J.E. Nelson, “Cyprus Bagdad’s $240-Million Expansion Boosts Production to 40,000 STPD,” Min. Eng., 30 (1978) pp. 351-354.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    R.P. Plasket and S. Romanchuk, “Recovery of Nickel and Copper from High-grade Matte at Impala Platinum by the Sherritt Process,” Hydrometallurgy, 3 (1978) pp. 135-161.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    A. Payne, “New South African Complex Leaches Gold, Uranium and Sulphur from Slimes,” EMJ 179 (1978) pp. 81-84.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    W. Millsap and H. Reisler, “Cotter’s New Plant Diets on Spent Catalyst,” EMJ, 179 (1978) pp. 105-107.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    D.R. Spink, “Energy Requirements for the Extractive Metallurgy of Copper,” Annual Volume, Met. Soc. of CIM., Vol. 16, 1977, pp. 167-175.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    P.A. Distin, “Nickel Extraction from Reduction-Roasted Ores by Copper Sulfate Leaching,” J. Metals, 30 (1978) pp. 30-35.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    C.L. Apostolidis and P.A. Distin, “The Kinetics of the Sulphuric Acid Leaching of Nickel and Magnesium from Reduction Roasted Serpentine,” Hydrometallurgy, 3 (1978) pp. 181-196.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    J.P. Bryson and P.A. Distin, “The Recovery of Nickel Laterites by Chelate Formation and Reduction with Hydrogen,” Hydrometallurgy, 3 (1978) pp. 343-354.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    J.H. Canterford, “Leaching of Some Australian Nickeliferous Laterites with Sulfuric Acid at Atmospheric Pressure,” Proc. Australas. Inst. Min. Metall., 265 (1978) pp. 19-26.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    R.B. Coleman, “Today’s Uranium Milling Costs,” Min. Eng., 30 (1978) pp. 14271432.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    S.B. Kesler and H.L. Shergold, “Behaviour of Oxidized Zinc Minerals in Cyanide Solutions,” Inst. Min. Metall., 87 (1978) pp. C50-59.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    M.F. DeGuire, A.L. Hannaford, and L. Harris, “Pilot Plant Operations on Gamsberg Manganiferous Zinc Concentrates,” Soc. Min. Eng. of AIME, Preprint No. 78-B-30, AIME Annual Meeting, Denver, Colo., February, 1978.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    G.M. Swinkels and R.M.G.S. Berezowsky, “The Sherritt-Cominco Copper Process - Part I: The Process,” CIM Bulletin, 71 (1978) pp. 105-121.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    P. Kawulka, C.R. Kirby, and G.L. Bolton, “The Sherritt-Cominco Copper Process - Part II: Pilot-Plant Operation,” CIM Bulletin, 71 (1978) pp. 122-130.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    D.E.G. Maschmeyer, P. Kawulka, E.F.G. Milner and G.M. Swinkels, “Application of the Sherritt-Cominco Copper Process to Arizona Copper Concentrates,” J. Metals, 30 (1978) pp. 27-31.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    K.N. Subramanian, A.J. Oliver, J.A. Thomas and E. Krause, “Production of Copper by a Pressure Leaching Precipitation, Electrowinning Process,” CIM Bulletin, 71 (797) (1978) pp. 132-137.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    J.H. McNamara, W.A. Ahrens and J.B. Franek, “A Hydrometallurgical Process for the Extraction of Copper,” paper presented 107th AIME Annual Meeting, Denver, Colo., February, 1978.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    R.W. Bartlett, “A Process That Uses Sulfur From a Copper Concentrate to Reduce Leached Copper,” Society of Min. Engrs. AIME Preprint No. 78-B-13, AIME Annual Meeting, Denver, Colo., February, 1978.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    J.E. Dutrizac, “The Kinetics of Dissolution of Chalcopyrite in Ferric Ion Media,” Met. Trans B., 9 (1978) pp. 431-439.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    B.J. Scheiner, G.A. Smyres, P.R. Haskett and R.E. Lindstrom, “Copper and Silver Recovery from a Sulfide Concentrate by Ferrous Chloride-Oxygen Leaching,” U.S. Bureau of Mines, R1 8290, 1978.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    I.G. Reilly and D.S. Scott, “Recovery of Elemental Sulfur During the Ammoniacal Leaching of Copper Sulfate,” Met. Trans. B., 9 (1978) pp. 681-686.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    J.E. Dutrizac and R.J.C. MacDonald, “The Dissolution of Sphalerite in Ferric Chloride Solutions,” Met. Trans. B., 9 (1978) pp. 543-551.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    M.J. Nicol and P.D. Scott, “The Kinetics of the Leaching of Zinc Sulphide Concentrates in Acidic Solutions Containing Ferric Sulphate,” National Institute for Metallurgy, Report No. 1949, 1978.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    H.H. Dewing and A.A. Cochran, “Sulfuric Acid Extraction Technique for Recovering Zinc and Sulphur from Sphalerite,” U.S. Bureau of Mines, RI 8322, 1978.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    E.L. Ghali and B. Girard, “La Lixiviation de Concentres de Sulfures de Nickel Par Le Chlorure Ferrique,” Hydrometallurgy, 3 (1978) pp. 355-371.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    P.P. Shukla, T.K. Mukherjee and C.K. Gupta, “A Nitric Acid Route for Processing a Nickel/Copper Sulphide Concentrate,” Hydrometallurgy, 3 (1978) pp. 55-64.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    D.A.D. Boateng and C.R. Phillips, “The Hydrometallurgy of Nickel Extraction From Sulphide Ores, Part I: Feed Preparation and Leaching Systems,” Min. Sci. Engr, 10 (3) (1978) pp. 155-162.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    A.V.D: Steen, J.E. Fuentes and C. Salvo, “Hydrometallurgical Recovery of Molybdenum From Low-Grade Molybdenite,” The Metallurgical Society of CIM, Annual Vol. 1977, pp. 7-10.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    I.H. Warren, A. Ismay and J. King, “The Leaching of Molybdenite with Sodium Hypochlorite Solutions,” The Metallurgical Society of CIM, Annual Volume, 1977, pp. 11-20.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    G.C. Thom, P.F. Waters and A.F. Hadermann, “A Study of the Metal Sulfide-Sulfur Dioxide Reaction in Aqueous Media by Reaction Pressure Characterization and Ultraviolet Spectrophotometry,” Hydrometallurgy, 3 (1978) pp. 373-396.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    R. Addison and H.R. Prieto, “Reagent Optimization in a Gold/ Silver Cyanide Plant,” Mining Congress Journal (1979) pp. 29-33.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    P.J.D. Lloyd, “Maximizing the Recovery of Gold from Witwatersrand Ores,” Min. Sci. Engr., 10 (3) (1978) pp. 208-221.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    D.W. Kirk, F.R. Foulkes and W.F. Graydon, “A Study of Anodic Dissolution of Gold in Aqueous Alkaline Cyanide,” J. Electrochem. Soc., 125 (9) (1978) pp. 1436-1443.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    J. Sedzimir and M. Bujanska, “Kinetics of Leaching of Copper Metal in Copper(II) - Ammonium Sulphate Solutions as Determined by the Rotating Disc Method,” Hydrometallurgy, 3 (1978) pp. 233-248.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    K.K. Mishra and M.L. Kapoor, “Kinetics of Liquid-Gas Reactions Through Bubbles,” Hydrometallurgy, 3 (1978) pp. 75-83.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    “Formidable Challenges Await Uranium Mining,” Min. Eng., 30 (1978) pp. 14231426.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    W.C. Larson, “Uranium In Situ Leach Mining in the United States,” U.S. Bureau of Mines IC 8777, 1978.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    W.C. Larson and D.V. Dandrea, “In Situ Leaching Bibliography, Part I,” U.S. Bureau of Mines Twin Cities Mining Research Center, P.O. Box 1660, Twin Cities, Minnesota, 55111, July, 1978.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    J.J. Borkert and C.E. Gerity, “An Economic Analysis of Open-Pit and In Situ Mining,” Min. Eng., 30 (1978) pp. 1420-1422.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    C.K. Chase, H.J. Winters and R.B. Bhappu, “Economic Evaluation of In Situ Extraction of Uranium,” In Situ, 2 (1) (1978) pp. 49-63.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    G.R. Davis and E.L. Reed, “Controlling Uranium Solution Mining Operations,” Mining Congress Journal (1978) pp. 35-38.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    D.R. Tweeton and K. Connor, “Well Construction Information for In Situ Uranium Leaching,” U.S. Bureau of Mines IC 8769, 1978.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    D.I. Kurth and R.D. Schmidt, “Computer Modeling of Five-Spot Well Pattern Fluid Flow During In Situ Uranium Leaching,” U.S. Bureau of Mines RI 8287, 1978.Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    P.S. Sundar, “In Situ Leaching Simulation Studies of Uranium Ores,” Soc. Min. Eng. of AIME, Preprint No. 78-AS-102, AIME Annual Meeting, Denver, Colo., February, 1978.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    B.C. Lawes, “Effect of Sodium Silicate on Leaching Uranium Ores With Hydrogen Peroxide,” In Situ, 2 (2) (1978) pp. 75-92.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    P. Galicohn, R.S. Schecter, A. Cowley and M. Breland, “Chemical Factors in In Situ Uranium Leach Mining,” In Situ, 1 (2) (1978) pp. 125-146.Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    J.W. Erickson, “Underground In Situ Mining - A New Mining Method,” Min. Eng., 30 (1978) pp. 1532-1534.Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    R.G. Woolery, D.J. Hanson, J.A. Weber and S. Ramachandran, “Heap Leaching of Uranium - a Case History,” Min. Eng., 30 (1978) pp. 285-290.Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    “New TL Leaching Process Yields Economics for Copper and Uranium Ores,” EMJ, 30 (1978) pp. 100-102.Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    “Mining and Extraction of Copper at Lo Aguirre, Chile,” Mining Magazine, 139 (1978) pp. 33-37.Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    G.I.D. Roach and A.P. Prosser, “Prediction of Rates of Chemical Processes for Treatment of Low-grade Materials: Theory and Tests for Mass-transfer Controlled Reactions,” Inst. Min. Met. Trans C, 87 (1978) pp. C129-C138.Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    R.C. Howard-Goldsmith, “New Techniques in Copper Mining,” Mining Magazine, 138 (1978) pp. 111-118.Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    A.A. Selim and D.H. Yardley, “In Situ Leaching of Copper - An Economic Simulation Approach,” Min. Eng., 30 (1978) pp. 58-62.Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    C.B. Catanach, E.F. Moran, D.D. Porter, C.G. Rudershausen and R.W. Sommers, “Copper Leaching From an Orebody Blasted In Place,” In Situ, 1 (4) (1978) pp. 283-303.Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    R.J. Roman, “The Limitations of Laboratory Testing and Evaluation of Dump and In Situ Leaching,” In Situ, 1 (4) (1978) pp. 305-324.Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    L.J. Petrovic, R.A. Hard and I.V. Klumpar, “Economic Considerations for Recovering Copper From Deep Sulfide Deposits by Nuclear Rubblization,” In Situ, 1 (3) (1978) pp. 235-248.Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    W.F. Riggs, J. Veloz and H.R. Dahlberg, “Recovery of Copper,” U.S. Patent No. 4,091,079, May 1978.Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    A. Bruynesteyn and J.K. Ballard, “Determination of the Leaching Characteristics of an Oxide Ore From Butte, Montana.” Soc. Min. Eng. of AIME Preprint No. 78-AS-23, AIME Annual Meeting, Denver, Colo., February 1978.Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    N.W. LeRoux, “Discussions and Contributions,” Inst. Min. Metall., Trans. C, 87 (1978) pp. C125-C217.Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    L.E. Muff, L.M. Cathles, D.A. Reese, J.B. Hiskey, C.J. Popp, J.A. Brierley, D. Bloss, V.K. Berry and W.J. Schlitt, “Chemical, Biological, and Metallurgical Aspects of LargeScale Column Leaching Experiments for Solution Mining and In Situ Leaching,” In Situ, 1 (3) (1978) pp. 209-233.Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    V.K. Berry, L.E. Muff and J.B. Hiskey, “Galvanic Interaction Between Chalcopyrite and Pyrite During Bacterial Leaching of Low-Grade Waste,” Hydrometallurgy, 3 (1978) pp. 309-326.Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    H.J. Heinen, D.G. Peterson and R.E. Lindstrom, “Processing Gold Ores Using Heap Leach-Carbon Adsorption Methods,” U.S. Bureau of Mines IC 8770, 1978.Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    J.E. Dutrizac and R.J.C. MacDonald, “Percolation Leaching of Pyritic Zn-Pb-Cu Ores With Ferric Chloride Solution,” The Metallurgical Society of CIM, Annual Volume, 1977, pp. 186-194.Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    D.A.D. Boateng and C.R. Phillips, “The Hydrometallurgy of Nickel Extraction from Sulphide Ores - Part II: Solution Purification and Metal Recovery,” Minerals Sci. Eng., 10 (3) (1978) pp. 163-171.Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Aiko Aoki and Hiroshi Kametani, “Potential-pH Diagram of the Fe-S04-H20 Suspension System at 90°C,” Trans. of National Research Institute for Metals, 20 (2) (1978) pp. 14-20.Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Yoshiyuki Umetsu, Kazuteru Tozawa and Kin-Ichi Sasaki, “The Hydrolysis of Ferric Sulphate Solutions at Elevated Temperatures,” The Metallurgical Society of CIM Annual Volume, 1977, pp. 111-117.Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    A.J. Monhemius, “Precipitation Diagrams for Metal Hydroxides, Sulphides, Arsenates and Phosphates,” Institution of Mining and Metallurgy, Trans. C, 86 (1977) pp. C202-C206.Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    F. Marsicano and R.D. Hancock, “Potentialities and Limitations of Four-Parameter Equations for the Correlation of Formation Constants of Metal-Ion Complexes in Aqueous Solution,” National Institute for Metallurgy, Report No. 1951, May 1978.Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    G.E. Mapstone and B.R. Thorn, “The Hypochlorite Oxidation of Cyanide and Cyanate,” J. Appl. Chem, Biotechnol., 28 (1978) pp. 135-143.Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    W. Kunda and R. Hitesman, “Recovery of Iron As Magnetite From Aqueous Ferrous Sulphate Solution,” The Metallurgical Society of CIM Annual Volume, 1977, pp. 118-125.Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    H.G. Harris, R.M. Lattig, D.H. Cranney, W.F. Tucker and A.U. Blackham, “Hydrometallurgical Production of Zinc Sulfate Monohydrate from By-product Materials,” Mining Congress Journal, (1978) pp. 43-46.Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    K.N. Subramanian, N.C. Nissen, A. Illis and J.A. Thomas, “Recovering Selenium from Copper Anode Slimes,” Mining Eng., 30 (11) (1978) pp. 1538-1542.Google Scholar
  90. 90.
    C. Nikolic, P.B. Queneau, W.G. Sherwood, C.B. Barlow and C.S. Simons, “NickelCobalt Separation by Ozonation,” CIM Bulletin, 71 (798) (1978) pp. 121-127.Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    E. Schalch and M.J. Nicol, “Electrochemical Investigation of Copper Cementation on Iron,” Institution of Mining and Metallurgy, Trans. C., 87 (1978) pp. C16-C22.Google Scholar
  92. 92.
    S.M. El-Raghy and A.A. Abo-Salmma, “The Electrochemistry of Electroless Deposition of Copper,” J. Electrochem. Soc., 26 (2) (1979) pp. 171-176.Google Scholar
  93. 93.
    A. Paulin and V. Zlatkovic, “Kinetics of Copper Precipitation with Iron in Sulphate and Chloride Solutions,” Inst. Min. Metall., Trans. C., 87 (1978) pp. C106-C112.Google Scholar
  94. 94.
    V. Annamalai and J.B. Hiskey, “A Kinetic Study of Copper Cementation on Pure Aluminum,” Min. Eng. 30 (1978) pp. 650-659.Google Scholar
  95. 95.
    E.C. Lee, F. Lawson and K.N. Han, “Codeposition of Copper and Cadmium on to Zinc,” Inst. Min. Metall., Trans. C., 87 (1978) pp. C170-C179.Google Scholar
  96. 96.
    E.C. Lee, F. Lawson and K.N. Han, “Effect of Precipitant Surface Roughness on Cementation Kinetics,” Hydrometallurgy, 3 (1) (1978) pp. 7-21.Google Scholar
  97. 97.
    O.T. Inal and A.E. Torma, “Field-Ion-Microscopy of Cementation vs Substrate Dissolution as a Function of pH: Copper on Tungsten System,” J. Metals 30 (12) (1978) pp. 16-19.Google Scholar
  98. 98.
    V. Annamalai and L.E. Muff, “Effects of the Source of Chloride Ion and Surface Corrosion Patterns on the Kinetics of the Copper-Aluminum Cementation System,” Hydrometallurgy, 3 (3) (1978) pp. 249-263.Google Scholar
  99. 99.
    L.E. Muff and V. Annamalai, “An Electron Microscopic Study of Nucleation and Growth in Electrochemical Displacement Reactions: A Comparison of the Cu/Fe and Cu/Al Cementation Systems,” Met. Trans. B, 9 (1978) pp. 515-525.Google Scholar
  100. 100.
    W.N. Marchant, R.O. Dannenberg and P.T. Brooks, “Selenium Removal From Acidic Waste Water Using Zinc Reduction and Lime Neutralization,” U.S. Bureau of Mines, RI 8312, 1978.Google Scholar
  101. 101.
    “Fluidized Bed Electrolysis for Metal Recovery at Low Concentrations,” Min. Mag., 139 (1978) pp. 313-317.Google Scholar
  102. 102.
    H. Kametani and R. Hasegawa, “Preparation of Spherical Starting Particles Suitable for Suspension Electrolysis of Nonferrous Metals,” Trans. Nat. Res. Inst. for Metals, 20 (1978) pp. 13-21.Google Scholar
  103. 103.
    W.W. Harvey, M.R. Randlett and K.I. Bangerskis, “Exploratory Development of Air-agitation Copper Electrorefining,” J. Metals, 30 (7) (1978) pp. 32-41.Google Scholar
  104. 104.
    Y. Awakura, A. Ebata and Y. Kondo, “Distribution of Local Current Densities during Copper Electrodeposition on a Plane Vertical Cathode,” J. Electrochem. Soc., 126 (1979) pp. 23-30.Google Scholar
  105. 105.
    F.P. Haver, D.L. Bixby and M.M. Wong, “Aqueous Electrolysis of Lead Chloride,” U.S. Bureau of Mines, RI 8276, 1978.Google Scholar
  106. 106.
    M.A. Hughes and P.D. Middlebrook, “The Importance of Organic Phase Diffusion in the Solvent Extraction of Copper by LIX 64N-Experiments with a Static Interface Cell,” Inter. J. of Min. Proc., 5 (1978) pp. 229-240.Google Scholar
  107. 107.
    E.S.P. de Ortiz, “Interfacial Potential Effects on the Solvent Extraction of Metals,” J. Appl. Chem. Biotechnol., 28 (1978) pp. 149-156.Google Scholar
  108. 108.
    C. Hanson, M.A. Hughes and R.J. Whewell, “The Rate of Mass Transfer to Single Drops, The Copper Hydroxyoxime System,” J. Appl. Chem. Biotechnol., 28 (1978) pp. 426-434.Google Scholar
  109. 109.
    P.S. Ellender and G.J. Lawson, “Kinetic Investigations of the Extraction of Copper from Chloride and Sulphate Media with Commercial Selective Extractants,” J. Appl. Chem. Biotechnol., 28 (1978) pp. 435-442.Google Scholar
  110. 110.
    C.A. Fleming, M.J. Nicol, R.D. Hancock and N.P. Finkelstein, “The Kinetics of the Extraction of Copper by LIX 65N and the Catalytic Role of LIX63 in this Reaction,” J. Appl. Chem., Biotechnol., 28 (1978) pp. 443-452.Google Scholar
  111. 111.
    R.N. Sharma and M.H.I. Baird, “Solvent Extraction of Copper in a Reciprocating Plate Column,” Can. J. Chem. Eng., 56 (1978) pp. 310-315.Google Scholar
  112. 112.
    G. Barthel, “Solvent Extraction Recovery of Copper from Mine and Smelter Waters,” J. Metals, 30 (7) (1978) pp. 7-12.Google Scholar
  113. 113.
    N.M. Rice, M. Nedved and G.M. Ritcey, “The Extraction of Nickel from Ammoniacal Media and Its Separation from Copper, Cobalt and Zinc Using Hydroxyoxime Extractants,” Hydrometallurgy, 3 (1) (1978) pp. 35-54.Google Scholar
  114. 114.
    J.W. Hosking and N.M. Rice, “Metal and Reagent Species in the Organic Phase for Some Aromatic o-Hydroxyoximes,” Hydrometallurgy, 3 (3) (1978) pp. 217-231.Google Scholar
  115. 115.
    H. Nedjate, J.L. Sabot and D. Bauer, “Extraction Du Nickel Par Les Acides Dialkyldithiophosphoriques: Role De La Nature Du Groupement Alkyle,” Hydrometallurgy, 3 (3) (1978) pp. 283-295.Google Scholar
  116. 116.
    T. Sato, M. Kawamura, T. Nakamura and M. Ueda, “The Extraction of Divalent Manganese, Iron, Cobalt, Nickel, Copper and Zinc from Hydrochloric Acid Solutions by Di(2-Ethylhexyl) Phosphoric Acid,” J. Appl. Chem. Biotechnol., 28 (1978) pp. 85-94.Google Scholar
  117. 117.
    R.G. Sandberg and T.L. Hebble, “Cobalt and Nickel Removal From Zinc Sulfate Electrolyte by Solvent Extraction and Precipitation Techniques,” U.S. Bureau of Mines, RI 8320, 1978.Google Scholar
  118. 118.
    R.B. Sudderth, J.13. Clitheroe and G.A. Kordosky, “The Sulfite System - A New Hydrometallurgical Process for Zinc,” paper presented at the AIME Annual Meeting, Denver, Colo., February 1978.Google Scholar
  119. 119.
    C. Forrest and M.A. Hughes, “The Separation of Zinc from Copper by Di-2ethylhexyl-phosphoric Acid - An Equilibrium Study,” Hydrometallurgy, 3 (4) (1978) pp. 327-342.Google Scholar
  120. 120.
    A.E.P. Brown and T.V. Healy, “Separation of Zirconium from Hafnium in Nitric Acid Solutions by Solvent Extraction Using Dibutyl Butylphosphonate - Part I: Chemistry of the Separation,” Hydrometallurgy, 3 (3) (1978) pp. 265-274.Google Scholar
  121. 121.
    A.E.P. Brown and A.G. Wain, “Separation of Zirconium From Hafnium in Nitric Acid Solutions by Solvent Extraction Using Dibutyl Butylphosphonate - Part 2: MixerSettler Runs,” Hydrometallurgy, 3 (3) (1978) pp. 275-282.Google Scholar
  122. 122.
    “Mill Operators Push for Higher Efficiency in U3O8 Processing,” EMJ, 179 (1978) pp.- 84-90.Google Scholar
  123. 123.
    D.E. Traut, I.L. Nichols and D.C. Seidel, “Design Requirements for Uranium Ion Exchange from Ammonium Bicarbonate Solutions in a Fluidized System,” U.S. Bureau of Mines, RI 8280, 1978.Google Scholar
  124. 124.
    D.E. Traut, I.L. Nichols and D.C. Seidel, “Design Requirements for Uranium Ion Exchange From Acidic Solutions in a Fluidized System,” U.S. Bureau of Mines, RI 8282, 1978.Google Scholar
  125. 125.
    D.R. Dixon and D.B. Hawthorne, “Continuous Ion Exchange Using Magnetic Shell Resins. III. Treatment of Effluents Containing Heavy Metal Ions,” J. Appl. Chem. Biotechnol., 28 (1978) pp. 10-16.Google Scholar
  126. 126.
    M. J. Slater, B. H. Lucas and G.M. Ritcey, “Use of Continuous Ion Exchange for Removal of Environmental Contaminants from Waste Streams,” CIM Bulletin, 71 (796) (1978) pp. 117-123.Google Scholar
  127. 127.
    E. Stamboliadis, J. McHardy and T. Salman, “Ion Exchange Techniques for the Recovery of Gold From Cyanide Solutions,” CIM Bulletin, 71 (796) (1978) pp. 124-127.Google Scholar
  128. 128.
    S. J. Hussey, H. B. Salisbury and G. M. Potter, “Carbon-in-Pulp Silver Adsorption From Cyanide Leach Slurries of a Silver Ore,” U.S. Bureau of Mines, RI 8268, 1978.Google Scholar
  129. 129.
    P.B. Altringer, W.N. Marchant, R.O. Dannenberg and P.T. Brooks, “Tungsten Recovery From Searles Lake Brines,” U.S. Bureau of Mines, RI 8315, 1978.Google Scholar
  130. 130.
    G. V. Cullen, N. G. Siviour and G.M. Pearson, “Extracting Metals from Ammoniacal Solution with Low Rank Coals,” Met. Trans. B, 9 (1978) pp. 409-413.Google Scholar
  131. 131.
    T. Largman and S. Sifniades, “Recovery of Copper (II) From Aqueous Solutions by Means of Supported Liquid Membranes,” Hydrometallurgy, 3 (2) (1978) pp. 153-162.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society 1979

Authors and Affiliations

  • Milton E. Wadsworth
    • 1
  1. 1.University of UtahSalt Lake City

Personalised recommendations