Advertisement

JOM

, Volume 32, Issue 12, pp 10–17 | Cite as

Type 304 Stainless Steel With 0.5% Boron for Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel

  • Edward A. Loria
  • Hugh S. Isaacs
Technical Article

Summary

For many years, Type 304 stainless steel with 1–2 wt.% boron has been used for control rods and thermal shielding of nuclear reactors, and for spent-fuel storage racks. There is current interest in Type 304 with 0.5–0.7% boron for the latter application; this paper presents a metallurgical evaluation at 0.53% boron. As measured by Gleeble hot tensile testing, strength of the alloy is no more than 25% higher than standard 304, but ductility is reduced over the 900–1180°C range and hence would require special care in hot working. A uniform density and concentration of particles occur at grain boundaries which are 1 or 6 microns, and which analyze ∼50% chromium via EDAX/SEM. These chromium boride particles are very distinct and dominate TEM sections which reveal no “common” sensitization, as no carbides are present at grain boundaries. However, this does not exclude chromium depletion adjacent to the particles. Polarization measurements in 2.5N and 1.0N H2SO4 are presented along with results in oxalic acid and HNO3−HCl etching solution. From the electrochemical measurements, it is apparent that Type 304 with 0.53% boron is susceptible to intergranular attack. In non-sensitized specimens, the presence of boride particles may either accelerate intergranular corrosion or tend to suppress it, depending upon the environment.

Keywords

Boron Oxalic Acid Boride Austenitic Stainless Steel H2S04 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    B.J. Thomas and G. Henry, “Boron in Austenitic Stainless Steels,” in Boron in Steels, The Metallurgical Society of AIME (1980) p. 80–105.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    H.J. Goldschmidt, “Effect of Boron Additions to Austenitic Stainless Steels,” J. Iron and Steel Institute 209 (1971) p. 900–911.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    L.B. Prus, E.S. Byron, and J.F. Thompson, “Boron Stainless Steel Alloys,” Nuclear Science and Energy 4 (1958) p. 415–428.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    E.F. Nippes and W.F. Savage, “An Investigation of the Hot Ductility of High Temperature Alloys,” Welding Journal 34 (1955) p. 183–196.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    G. Henry, A. Mercier, J. Plateau, and J. Hochmann, “Influence of Residual Additions of Boron on Microstructure of Type 304 Steel,” Rev. Met. 60 (1963) p. 1221–1232.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    B. Thomas, Unpublished Research IRSID, quoted in reference 1.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    C.S. Pande, M. Suenaga, B. Vyas, and H.S. Isaacs, “Direct Evidence of Chromium Depletion near Grain Boundaries in Stainless Steels,” Scripta Met. 11 (1977) p. 681–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    F.P. Robinson and W.G. Scurr, “The Effect of Boron on Corrosion Resistance of Austenitic Stainless Steels,” Corrosion 33 (1977) p. 408–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    N.V. Baldina, Z.M. Kelina, M.F. Longinov, and N.G. Vertii, “Effect of Boron and Magnesium on Structure and Corrosion Resistance of Type 304 Steels,” Metal Science and Heat Treat. 15 (1973) p. 100–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    E.A. Loria, “Evaluating Tendency for Sensitization in Type 304 Stainless Steel via Jominy Bar Testing,” J. Metals 31 (1979) p. 137–146.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    W.D. France and N.D. Greene, “Predicting the Intergranular Corrosion of Austenitic Stainless Steels,” Corrosion Science 8 (1968) p. 9–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    B. Vyas and H.S. Isaacs, “Detecting Susceptibility to Intergranular Corrosion of Stainless Steel Weld Heat-Affected Zones,” STP 656, Intergranular Corrosion of Stainless Alloys, ASTM (1978) p. 133–145.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • Edward A. Loria
    • 1
  • Hugh S. Isaacs
    • 2
  1. 1.Universal-Cyclops Specialty Steel DivisionCyclops CorporationPittsburgh
  2. 2.Brookhaven National LaboratoryAssociated Universities Inc.UptonNew York

Personalised recommendations