Type 304 Stainless Steel With 0.5% Boron for Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
For many years, Type 304 stainless steel with 1–2 wt.% boron has been used for control rods and thermal shielding of nuclear reactors, and for spent-fuel storage racks. There is current interest in Type 304 with 0.5–0.7% boron for the latter application; this paper presents a metallurgical evaluation at 0.53% boron. As measured by Gleeble hot tensile testing, strength of the alloy is no more than 25% higher than standard 304, but ductility is reduced over the 900–1180°C range and hence would require special care in hot working. A uniform density and concentration of particles occur at grain boundaries which are 1 or 6 microns, and which analyze ∼50% chromium via EDAX/SEM. These chromium boride particles are very distinct and dominate TEM sections which reveal no “common” sensitization, as no carbides are present at grain boundaries. However, this does not exclude chromium depletion adjacent to the particles. Polarization measurements in 2.5N and 1.0N H2SO4 are presented along with results in oxalic acid and HNO3−HCl etching solution. From the electrochemical measurements, it is apparent that Type 304 with 0.53% boron is susceptible to intergranular attack. In non-sensitized specimens, the presence of boride particles may either accelerate intergranular corrosion or tend to suppress it, depending upon the environment.
KeywordsBoron Oxalic Acid Boride Austenitic Stainless Steel H2S04
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.B.J. Thomas and G. Henry, “Boron in Austenitic Stainless Steels,” in Boron in Steels, The Metallurgical Society of AIME (1980) p. 80–105.Google Scholar
- 2.H.J. Goldschmidt, “Effect of Boron Additions to Austenitic Stainless Steels,” J. Iron and Steel Institute 209 (1971) p. 900–911.Google Scholar
- 3.L.B. Prus, E.S. Byron, and J.F. Thompson, “Boron Stainless Steel Alloys,” Nuclear Science and Energy 4 (1958) p. 415–428.Google Scholar
- 4.E.F. Nippes and W.F. Savage, “An Investigation of the Hot Ductility of High Temperature Alloys,” Welding Journal 34 (1955) p. 183–196.Google Scholar
- 5.G. Henry, A. Mercier, J. Plateau, and J. Hochmann, “Influence of Residual Additions of Boron on Microstructure of Type 304 Steel,” Rev. Met. 60 (1963) p. 1221–1232.Google Scholar
- 6.B. Thomas, Unpublished Research IRSID, quoted in reference 1.Google Scholar
- 10.E.A. Loria, “Evaluating Tendency for Sensitization in Type 304 Stainless Steel via Jominy Bar Testing,” J. Metals 31 (1979) p. 137–146.Google Scholar
- 12.B. Vyas and H.S. Isaacs, “Detecting Susceptibility to Intergranular Corrosion of Stainless Steel Weld Heat-Affected Zones,” STP 656, Intergranular Corrosion of Stainless Alloys, ASTM (1978) p. 133–145.Google Scholar